The Sustainable Rivers Audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia

The Sustainable Rivers Audit (SRA) is a systematic assessment of the health of river ecosystems in the Murray–Darling Basin (MDB), Australia. It has similarities to the United States’ Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program, the European Water Framework Directive and the South African River Health Program, but is designed expressly to represent functional and structural links between ecosystem components, biophysical condition and human interventions in the MDB. Environmental metrics derived from field samples and/or modelling are combined as indicators of condition in five themes (Hydrology, Fish, Macroinvertebrates, Vegetation and Physical Form). Condition indicator ratings are combined using expert-system rules to indicate ecosystem health, underpinned by conceptual models. Reference condition, an estimate of condition had there been no significant human intervention in the landscape, provides a benchmark for comparisons. To illustrate, a synopsis is included of health assessments in 2004–2007. This first audit completed assessments of condition and ecosystem health at the valley scale and in altitudinal zones, and future reports will include trend assessments. SRA river-health assessments are expected to play a key role in future water and catchment management through integration in a Basin Plan being developed by the Murray–Darling Basin Authority for implementation after 2011. For example, there could be links to facilitate monitoring against environmental targets.

[1]  Keith F. Walker,et al.  A perspective on dryland river ecosystems , 1995 .

[2]  T. Capon,et al.  Resilience and thresholds in river ecosystems , 2009 .

[3]  W van de Bund,et al.  Towards good ecological status of surface waters in Europe--interpretation and harmonisation of the concept. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  John L Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Don L. Stevens,et al.  Implementation of a National Monitoring Program , 1994 .

[6]  Mark Patrick Taylor,et al.  A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment , 2001 .

[7]  J. Harris,et al.  Large‐scale assessments of river health using an Index of Biotic Integrity with low‐diversity fish communities , 1999 .

[8]  B J C Perera,et al.  Computer software tool REALM for sustainable water allocation and management. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  M. Meybeck Global analysis of river systems: from Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  Peter Davies,et al.  Development of a Framework for the Sustainable Rivers Audit , 2001 .

[11]  M. Stewardson,et al.  Sustainable Rivers Audit Filters Project Stage 2 , 2007 .

[12]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Redefinition and Elaboration of River Ecosystem Health: Perspective for River Management , 2006 .

[13]  Michael Negnevitsky,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems , 2001 .

[14]  K. Hughey,et al.  Ecosystem health demystified: an ecological concept determined by economic means , 2005 .

[15]  B. Chessman,et al.  Bioassessment without reference sites: use of environmental filters to predict natural assemblages of river macroinvertebrates , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[16]  B. Chessman,et al.  Bioassessment in A Harsh Environment: A Comparison of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages at Reference and Assessment Sites in An Australian Inland River System , 2006, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[17]  M. Lintermans Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: an introductory guide , 2007 .

[18]  Tristan Hatton-Ellis,et al.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Water Framework Directive , 2008 .