Display rules for anger and aggression in school-age children.

2 related studies addressed the development of display rules for anger and the relation between use of display rules for anger and aggressiveness as rated by school peers. Third, fifth, and seventh graders (ages 8.4, 10.9, and 12.8, respectively) gave hypothetical responses to videotaped, anger provoking vignettes. Overall, regardless of how display rules were defined, subjects reported display rules more often with teachers than with peers for both facial expressions and actions. Reported masking of facial expressions of anger increased with age, but only with teachers. Girls reported masking of facial expressions of anger more than boys. There was a trend for aggressive subjects to invoke display rules for anger less than nonaggressive subjects. The phenomenon of display rules for anger is complex and dependent on the way display rules are defined and the age and gender of the subjects. Most of all, whether children say they would behave angrily seems to be determined by the social context for revealing angry feelings; children say they would express anger genuinely much more often with peers than with teachers.

[1]  C. Doubleday Children's Knowledge of Display Rules for Emotional Expression and Control. , 1990 .

[2]  Carolyn Saarni,et al.  Children's understanding of the interpersonal consequences of dissemblance of nonverbal emotional-expressive behavior , 1988 .

[3]  D. Fuchs,et al.  Children's expected interpersonal consequences of communicating their affective state and reported likelihood of expression. , 1988, Child development.

[4]  K. Dodge,et al.  Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: a cross-age comparison. , 1988, Child development.

[5]  R. Karniol,et al.  How would you feel? Children's inferences regarding their own and others' affective reactions , 1987 .

[6]  C. Saarni An Observational Study of Children's Attempts to Monitor Their Expressive Behavior. , 1984 .

[7]  K. Dodge,et al.  Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. , 1983 .

[8]  J. Haviland,et al.  Learning display rules: the socialization of emotion expression in infancy. , 1982, Child development.

[9]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[10]  C. Saarni Children's Understanding of Display Rules for Expressive Behavior. , 1979 .

[11]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[12]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[13]  C. Saarni Children's understanding of strategic control of emotional expression in social transactions. , 1989 .

[14]  Paul L. Harris,et al.  Children's understanding of emotion , 1989 .

[15]  L. L. Sperry,et al.  The Socialization of Anger and Aggression. , 1987 .

[16]  C. Saarni Cultural Rules of Emotional Experience: A Commentary on Miller and Sperry's Study. , 1987 .

[17]  J. Gnepp,et al.  Children's understanding of verbal and facial display rules. , 1986 .

[18]  J. Youniss,et al.  Social Development Through Friendship , 1982 .

[19]  P. Ekman Unmasking The Face , 1975 .