Microtubule Targeting of Substrate Contacts Promotes Their Relaxation and Dissociation

We recently showed that substrate contact sites in living fibroblasts are specifically targeted by microtubules (Kaverina, I., K. Rottner, and J.V. Small. 1998. J. Cell Biol. 142:181–190). Evidence is now provided that microtubule contact targeting plays a role in the modulation of substrate contact dynamics. The results are derived from spreading and polarized goldfish fibroblasts in which microtubules and contact sites were simultaneously visualized using proteins conjugated with Cy-3, rhodamine, or green fluorescent protein. For cells allowed to spread in the presence of nocodazole the turnover of contacts was retarded, as compared with controls and adhesions that were retained under the cell body were dissociated after microtubule reassembly. In polarized cells, small focal complexes were found at the protruding cell front and larger adhesions, corresponding to focal adhesions, at the retracting flanks and rear. At retracting edges, multiple microtubule contact targeting preceded contact release and cell edge retraction. The same effect could be observed in spread cells, in which microtubules were allowed to reassemble after local disassembly by the application of nocodazole to one cell edge. At the protruding front of polarized cells, focal complexes were also targeted and as a result remained either unchanged in size or, more rarely, were disassembled. Conversely, when contact targeting at the cell front was prevented by freezing microtubule growth with 20 nM taxol and protrusion stimulated by the injection of constitutively active Rac, peripheral focal complexes became abnormally enlarged. We further found that the local application of inhibitors of myosin contractility to cell edges bearing focal adhesions induced the same contact dissociation and edge retraction as observed after microtubule targeting. Our data are consistent with a mechanism whereby microtubules deliver localized doses of relaxing signals to contact sites to retard or reverse their development. We propose that it is via this route that microtubules exert their well-established control on cell polarity.

[1]  B. Geiger,et al.  Contact formation during fibroblast locomotion: involvement of membrane ruffles and microtubules , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  G. Rinnerthaler Cytostructural dynamics of contact formation during fibroblast locomotion in vitro , 1985 .

[3]  J. Asai,et al.  Cytoskeleton , 2002, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[4]  K. Rottner,et al.  Interplay between Rac and Rho in the control of substrate contact dynamics , 1999, Current Biology.

[5]  G. Gundersen,et al.  Rho Guanosine Triphosphatase Mediates the Selective Stabilization of Microtubules Induced by Lysophosphatidic Acid , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  R. Geahlen,et al.  Phosphorylation- and Activation-independent Association of the Tyrosine Kinase Syk and the Tyrosine Kinase Substrates Cbl and Vav with Tubulin in B-Cells* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  P. Nurse,et al.  tea1 and the Microtubular Cytoskeleton Are Important for Generating Global Spatial Order within the Fission Yeast Cell , 1997, Cell.

[8]  John G. Collard,et al.  The Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Tiam1 Affects Neuronal Morphology; Opposing Roles for the Small GTPases Rac and Rho , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  P Wadsworth,et al.  Regional regulation of microtubule dynamics in polarized, motile cells. , 1999, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  M. Schliwa,et al.  Persistent, directional motility of cells and cytoplasmic fragments in the absence of microtubules , 1984, Nature.

[11]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  F. Perez,et al.  CLIP-170 Highlights Growing Microtubule Ends In Vivo , 1999, Cell.

[13]  Y. Zheng,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of GEF-H1, a Microtubule-associated Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac and Rho GTPases* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  E. Salmon,et al.  Actomyosin-based Retrograde Flow of Microtubules in the Lamella of Migrating Epithelial Cells Influences Microtubule Dynamic Instability and Turnover and Is Associated with Microtubule Breakage and Treadmilling , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  Klemens Rottner,et al.  Targeting, Capture, and Stabilization of Microtubules at Early Focal Adhesions , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  G. Borisy,et al.  Direct observation of microtubule dynamics in living cells , 1988, Nature.

[17]  B A Danowski,et al.  Fibroblast contractility and actin organization are stimulated by microtubule inhibitors. , 1989, Journal of cell science.

[18]  L. Lim,et al.  Rho family GTPases and neuronal growth cone remodelling: relationship between increased complexity induced by Cdc42Hs, Rac1, and acetylcholine and collapse induced by RhoA and lysophosphatidic acid , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  Shuh Narumiya,et al.  Calcium sensitization of smooth muscle mediated by a Rho-associated protein kinase in hypertension , 1997, Nature.

[20]  Y. Wang,et al.  High resolution detection of mechanical forces exerted by locomoting fibroblasts on the substrate. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  T. Enomoto,et al.  Microtubule disruption induces the formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions in cultured cells: possible involvement of the rho signal cascade. , 1996, Cell structure and function.

[22]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia , 1995, Cell.

[23]  E. Salmon,et al.  Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[24]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Molecular Dissection of the Rho-associated Protein Kinase (p160ROCK)-regulated Neurite Remodeling in Neuroblastoma N1E-115 Cells , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  S. Narumiya,et al.  Rho effectors and reorganization of actin cytoskeleton , 1997, FEBS letters.

[26]  W. T. Chen Surface changes during retraction-induced spreading of fibroblasts. , 1981, Journal of cell science.

[27]  C. Hahn,et al.  A balance of signaling by Rho family small GTPases RhoA, Rac1 and Cdc42 coordinates cytoskeletal morphology but not cell survival , 1999, Oncogene.

[28]  P. Forscher,et al.  Myosin Drives Retrograde F-Actin Flow in Neuronal Growth Cones , 1996, Neuron.

[29]  K. Miller,et al.  A Class VI Unconventional Myosin Is Associated with a Homologue of a Microtubule-binding Protein, Cytoplasmic Linker Protein–170, in Neurons and at the Posterior Pole of Drosophila Embryos , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  W. Saunders Action at the ends of microtubules. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[31]  S. Bagrodia,et al.  The Dbl-related Protein, Lfc, Localizes to Microtubules and Mediates the Activation of Rac Signaling Pathways in Cells* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  K. Burridge,et al.  Bidirectional signaling between the cytoskeleton and integrins. , 1999, Current opinion in cell biology.

[33]  L. Lim,et al.  The Ras-related GTPase Rac1 Binds Tubulin (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  B. Geiger,et al.  Involvement of microtubules in the control of adhesion-dependent signal transduction , 1996, Current Biology.

[35]  E Schaefer,et al.  The MAP kinase kinase kinase MLK2 co‐localizes with activated JNK along microtubules and associates with kinesin superfamily motor KIF3 , 1998, The EMBO journal.