Liquidity, Investment Style, and the Relation between Fund Size and Fund Performance

Abstract Using stock transactions data along with detailed stockholdings for a comprehensive sample of U.S. actively managed equity mutual funds from 1993 to 2002, this paper empirically examines the effect of liquidity and investment style on the relation between fund size and fund performance. Consistent with Chen, Hong, Huang, and Kubik (2004), I find a significant inverse relation between fund size and fund performance. Further, this inverse relation is stronger among funds that hold less liquid portfolios. The inverse relation between fund size and fund performance is also more pronounced among growth and high turnover funds that tend to have high demands for immediacy. Overall, this paper's findings suggest that liquidity is an important reason why fund size erodes performance.

[1]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[2]  Mark M. Carhart.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[3]  Ming Huang,et al.  Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization , 2004 .

[4]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings , 1989 .

[5]  Peter Tufano,et al.  Board structure and fee-setting in the U.S. mutual fund industry , 1997 .

[6]  Wayne E. Ferson,et al.  Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions , 1996 .

[7]  Edwin J. Elton,et al.  A First Look at the Accuracy of the Crsp Mutual Fund Database and a Comparison of the Crsp and Morningstar Mutual Fund Databases , 2001 .

[8]  R. Evans.  Does *alpha really matter? Evidence from mutual fund incubation, termination and manager change , 2004 .

[9]  Robert D. Arnott,et al.  Rebalancing a Global Policy Benchmark , 2002 .

[10]  E. Fama,et al.  Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies , 1996 .

[11]  Information Production and Capital Allocation: Decentralized vs. Hierarchical Firms , 2000 .

[12]  Andre F. Perold,et al.  The Right Amount of Assets Under Management , 1991 .

[13]  Louis K.C. Chan,et al.  The Behavior of Stock Prices Around Institutional Trades , 1993 .

[14]  R. Faff,et al.  Fund size , fund flow , transaction costs and performance : Size matters ! , 2005 .

[15]  Roger M. Edelen.  Investor flows and the assessed performance of open-end mutual funds , 1999 .

[16]  Charles M. C. Lee,et al.  Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data , 1991 .

[17]  Robert C. Pozen,et al.  The Mutual Fund Business , 1998 .

[18]  Donald B. Keim,et al.  Transactions costs and investment style: an inter-exchange analysis of institutional equity trades , 1997 .

[19]  E. Fama,et al.  Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  William H. Sackley.  Transactions Costs and Investment Style: An Inter-Exchange Analysis of Institutional Equity Trades , 1998 .

[21]  Massimo Massa,et al.  Favoritism in Mutual Fund Families? Evidence on Strategic Cross-Fund Subsidization , 2004 .

[22]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance: Does Fund Size Matter? , 1999 .

[23]  Gregory Kadlec,et al.  On the Perils of Financial Intermediaries Setting Security Prices: The Mutual Fund Wild Card Option , 2001 .

[24]  S. Agate,et al.  Small is beautiful , 2003, English Today.

[25]  Joseph Chen,et al.  Does Fund Size Erode Performance? Liquidity, Organizational Diseconomies and Active Money Management , 2002 .

[26]  Avanidhar Subrahmanyam,et al.  Market Liquidity and Trading Activity , 2000 .

[27]  Richard Roll,et al.  Orderimbalance, Liquidity and Market Returns , 2001 .

[28]  Russ Wermers,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses , 2000 .

[29]  Charles M. Jones,et al.  A Century of Stock Market Liquidity and Trading Costs , 2002 .