On the Introduction of Canny Operator in an Advanced Imaging Algorithm for Real-Time Detection of Hyperbolas in Ground-Penetrating Radar Data

This paper focuses on the use of the Canny edge detector as the first step of an advanced imaging algorithm for automated detection of hyperbolic reflections in ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data. Since the imaging algorithm aims to work in real time; particular attention is paid to its computational efficiency. Various alternative criteria are designed and examined, to fasten the procedure by eliminating unnecessary edge pixels from Canny-processed data, before such data go through the subsequent steps of the detection algorithm. The effectiveness and reliability of the proposed methodology are tested on a wide set of synthetic and experimental radargrams with promising results. The finite-difference time-domain simulator gprMax is used to generate synthetic radargrams for the tests, while the real radargrams come from GPR surveys carried out by the authors in urban areas. The imaging algorithm is implemented in MATLAB.

[1]  Giovanni Leone,et al.  Subsurface Detection of Shallow Targets by Undersampled Multifrequency Data and a Non-Cooperative Source , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[2]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction From GPR Data With Applications to Rebar Detection , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[3]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Electromagnetic modelling of Ground Penetrating Radar responses to complex targets , 2014 .

[4]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  Point coordinates extraction from localized hyperbolic reflections in GPR data , 2017 .

[5]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Automated Data Extraction from Synthetic and Real Radargrams of Complex Structures , 2018, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.

[6]  Anuj Kumar,et al.  Comparison between Various Edge Detection Methods on Satellite Image , 2013 .

[7]  Henrique Lorenzo,et al.  GPR Signal Characterization for Automated Landmine and UXO Detection Based on Machine Learning Techniques , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Xiao Zhao,et al.  The connected-component labeling problem: A review of state-of-the-art algorithms , 2017, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Li Liu,et al.  Improved Clutter Removal by Robust Principal Component Analysis for Chaos Through-Wall Imaging Radar , 2019 .

[10]  SIMONE MESCHINO,et al.  A PRACTICAL GUIDE ON USING SPOT-GPR , A FREEWARE TOOL IMPLEMENTING A SAP-DOA TECHNIQUE , 2018 .

[11]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Cylindrical-Wave Approach for electromagnetic scattering by subsurface metallic targets in a lossy medium , 2013 .

[12]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  Integration of modern remote sensing technologies for faster utility mapping and data extraction , 2015 .

[13]  Jörg Schmalzl,et al.  Using pattern recognition to automatically localize reflection hyperbolas in data from ground penetrating radar , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Ground Clutter Removal in GPR Surveys , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Jin Chen,et al.  Tree Root Automatic Recognition in Ground Penetrating Radar Profiles Based on Randomized Hough Transform , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Kristin J. Dana,et al.  Automated GPR Rebar Analysis for Robotic Bridge Deck Evaluation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[17]  G. T. Shrivakshan,et al.  A Comparison of various Edge Detection Techniques used in Image Processing , 2012 .

[18]  Augusto Sarti,et al.  Detection of linear objects in GPR data , 2004, Signal Process..

[19]  Chen Xiao-li,et al.  Feature extraction and classification of echo signal of ground penetrating radar , 2008, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[20]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  Buried pipe localization using an iterative geometric clustering on GPR data , 2014, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[21]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Short-Pulse Electromagnetic Scattering by Buried Perfectly Conducting Cylinders , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[22]  Lu Wang,et al.  Automatic Feature Recognition for GPR Image Processing , 2010 .

[23]  Claudio Estatico,et al.  Microwave Imaging by Means of Lebesgue-Space Inversion: An Overview , 2019, Electronics.

[24]  Raffaele Persico,et al.  Automated Detection of Reflection Hyperbolas in Complex GPR Images With No A Priori Knowledge on the Medium , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  SPOT-GPR: A Freeware Tool for Target Detection and Localizationin GPR Data Developed within the COST Action TU1208 , 2017 .

[26]  Antonios Giannopoulos,et al.  Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax , 2005 .

[27]  Josef Kittler,et al.  A survey of the hough transform , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[28]  Chao Yu,et al.  An automatic recognition algorithm for GPR images of RC structure voids , 2013 .

[29]  Fauzia Ahmad,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Group Sparse Reconstruction and Total Variation Minimization for Target Imaging in Stratified Subsurface Media , 2019, Electronics.

[30]  Colin G. Windsor,et al.  A Data Pair-Labeled Generalized Hough Transform for Radar Location of Buried Objects , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[31]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  CIVIL ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR , 2013 .

[32]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  Application of Coupled-Wave Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin Approximation to Ground Penetrating Radar , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Roberta Palmeri,et al.  Multiresolution Virtual Experiments for Microwave Imaging of Complex Scenarios , 2019, Electronics.

[34]  Miro Govedarica,et al.  A new method to simultaneously estimate the radius of a cylindrical object and the wave propagation velocity from GPR data , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[35]  Ireyuwa E. Igbinosa,et al.  Comparison of Edge Detection Technique in Image Processing Techniques , 2013 .

[36]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[37]  Matteo Pastorino,et al.  Detection of subsurface metallic utilities by means of a SAP technique: Comparing MUSIC- and SVM-based approaches , 2013 .

[38]  Craig Warren,et al.  A Machine Learning-Based Fast-Forward Solver for Ground Penetrating Radar With Application to Full-Waveform Inversion , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[39]  Paolo Gamba,et al.  Neural detection of pipe signatures in ground penetrating radar images , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[40]  S. Fontul,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar for the evaluation and monitoring of transport infrastructures , 2019, Innovation in Near-Surface Geophysics.

[41]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  TU1208 Open Database of Radargrams: The Dataset of the IFSTTAR Geophysical Test Site , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[42]  Lara Pajewski,et al.  A CWA-Based Detection Procedure of a Perfectly-Conducting Cylinder Buried in a Dielectric Half-Space , 2008 .

[43]  Hirokazu Kobayashi,et al.  Entropy-Based Low-Rank Approximation for Contrast Dielectric Target Detection with Through Wall Imaging System , 2019, Electronics.

[44]  Zhihong Fu,et al.  Imaging of the Internal Structure of Permafrost in the Tibetan Plateau Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2019 .