Determination of T-stress from finite element analysis for mode I and mixed mode I/II loading

The elastic T-stress has been recognised as a measure of constraint around the tip of a crack in contained yielding problems. A review of the literature indicates that most methods for obtaining T are confined to simple geometry and loading configurations. This paper explores direct use of finite element analysis for calculating T. It is shown that for mode I more reliable results with less mesh refinement can be achieved if crack flank nodal displacements are used. Methods are also suggested for calculating T for any mixed mode I/II loading without having to calculate stress intensity factors. There is good agreement between the results from the proposed methods and analytical results. T-stress is determined for a test configuration designed to investigate brittle and ductile fracture in mixed mode loading. It is shown that in shear loading of a cracked specimen T vanishes only when a truly antisymmetric field of deformation is provided. However this rarely happens in practice and the presence of T in shear is often inevitable. It is shown that for some cases the magnitude of T in shear is much more than that for tension. The effect of crack length is also investigated.

[1]  Stanley T. Rolfe,et al.  Effects of crack depth on elastic-plastic fracture toughness , 1991 .

[2]  David J. Smith,et al.  A STUDY OF SUPERIMPOSED FRACTURE MODES I, II AND III ON PMMA , 1993 .

[3]  T. Fett.  A Green's function for T-stresses in an edge-cracked rectangular plate , 1997 .

[4]  D. Nowell,et al.  USE OF THE DISTRIBUTED DISLOCATIONS METHOD TO DETERMINE THE T-STRESS , 1994 .

[5]  T. Sham.  The determination of the elastic T-term using higher order weight functions , 1991 .

[6]  James D. Lee,et al.  The constant stress term , 1995 .

[7]  A. Kfouri.  Some evaluations of the elastic T-term using Eshelby's method , 1986 .

[8]  J. Hancock,et al.  J dominance in mixed mode loading , 1991, International Journal of Fracture.

[9]  A. J. Carlsson,et al.  Influence of non-singular stress terms and specimen geometry on small-scale yielding at crack tips in elastic-plastic materials , 1973 .

[10]  P. C. Olsen.  Determining the stress intensity factors KI, KII and the T-term via the conservation laws using the boundary element method , 1994 .

[11]  Andrew H. Sherry,et al.  COMPENDIUM OF T‐STRESS SOLUTIONS FOR TWO AND THREE DIMENSIONAL CRACKED GEOMETRIES , 1995 .

[12]  P. Leevers,et al.  Inherent stress biaxiality in various fracture specimen geometries , 1982 .

[13]  Near tip stress and strain fields for short elastic cracks , 1993 .

[14]  J. Williams,et al.  Further results on the angled crack problem , 1976, International Journal of Fracture.

[15]  C. Shih,et al.  Effect of Constraint on Specimen Dimensions Needed to Obtain Structurally Relevant Toughness Measures , 1993 .

[16]  J. W. Hancock,et al.  J-Dominance of short cracks in tension and bending , 1991 .

[17]  J. Hancock,et al.  Two-Parameter Characterization of Elastic-Plastic Crack-Tip Fields , 1991 .

[18]  P. Fedeliński,et al.  Contour integrals for mixed-mode crack analysis: effect of nonsingular terms , 1997 .

[19]  M. Williams,et al.  On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack , 1956 .

[20]  N. Hallbäck,et al.  T-stress evaluations of mixed mode I/II fracture specimens and T-effects on mixed mode failure of aluminium , 1996 .