Stimuli to differentiate the neural response at successive stages of visual processing using the VEP from human visual cortex

BACKGROUND Clarifying the enigmatic relationship between stimulus property, neural response and the evoked potential is essential if non-invasive functional imaging is to make a meaningful contribution to the understanding of how maturational or degenerative processes influence brain activity. Visual cortex has proven a favourite target to elucidate this relationship. However, to date most studies involving the visual system have yielded inconsistent results or have been strongly criticised. NEW METHOD We developed a set of three visual stimuli, two of which either had the same low- or high spatial frequency characteristic. Adult volunteers viewed these as pattern reversing stimuli while the scalp electric potential was recorded using a 10-10 array of electrodes. RESULTS Established processing mechanisms of the primate visual system enabled us to link the amplitude of the N75 and P100 to the size of the neural population processing the temporal luminance contrast, and the amplitude of the N135 and P240 to the size of the neural processing the spatial luminance contrast in our stimuli. Calculating the distribution of current source density enabled us to identify the neural source of each VEP component. CONCLUSIONS Demonstrating a direct relationship between the temporal- and spatial luminance contrast properties of our stimuli and the size of the neural population involved provides a better understanding of the nature of the relationship between stimulus property, neural response and the VEP. It also shows that EEG can contribute in a significant manner to the study of the influence of maturational or degenerative processes on brain activity.

[1]  C. Schroeder,et al.  A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. , 1998, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  D. Mackay.  Source-density mapping of human visual receptive fields using scalp electrodes , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[5]  V. Mountcastle.  The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Jacob Jolij,et al.  Figure–ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2005, Neuroreport.

[8]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual Areas in Macaque Cortex Measured Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  M. Ito,et al.  Visual evoked response of single cells and of the EEG in primary visual area of the cat. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[11]  F. Ratliff,et al.  Bicuculline enhances a negative component and diminishes a positive component of the visual evoked cortical potential in the cat. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  N Nakasato,et al.  Neuromagnetic evidence that the P100 component of the pattern reversal visual evoked response originates in the bottom of the calcarine fissure. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  J L Kenemans,et al.  The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-related potentials and source modeling. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  T. Ono,et al.  Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex , 1998, Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Bach,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to various check patterns , 1985, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[16]  Michael F. Green,et al.  Perception measurement in clinical trials of schizophrenia: promising paradigms from CNTRICS. , 2009, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[17]  R. Srebro.  The topography of scalp potentials evoked by pattern pulse stimuli , 1987, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[19]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Two Phases of V1 Activity for Visual Recognition of Natural Images , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Impaired visual object recognition and dorsal/ventral stream interaction in schizophrenia. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[21]  Jeffreys Da.  Striate and extra-striate origins of pattern-related visual evoked potential (VEP) components. , 1970 .

[22]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  R. Douglas,et al.  Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Michael Bach,et al.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update) , 2010, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[26]  Paul Azzopardi,et al.  Uneven mapping of magnocellular and parvocellular projections from the lateral geniculate nucleus to the striate cortex in the macaque monkey , 1999, Vision Research.

[27]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[28]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  EEG oscillations in the gamma and alpha range respond differently to spatial frequency , 2007, Vision Research.

[29]  P. Lennie,et al.  Chromatic mechanisms in striate cortex of macaque , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  L. Jäncke,et al.  To see or not to see; the ability of the magno‐ and parvocellular response to manifest itself in the VEP determines its appearance to a pattern reversing and pattern onset stimulus , 2016, Brain and behavior.

[31]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Sustained and transient responses by cat striate cells to stationary flashing light and dark bars , 1979, Brain Research.

[32]  R. Spehlmann.  The averaged electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  J C Armington,et al.  The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation. , 1968, Vision research.

[34]  A. Halliday,et al.  Evoked potentials in clinical testing , 1982 .

[35]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  R. Douglas,et al.  Mapping the Matrix: The Ways of Neocortex , 2007, Neuron.

[37]  P. König,et al.  Top-down processing mediated by interareal synchronization. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  D. Dacey.  The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Inhibitory processes in the flash evoked potential of the monkey. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  R. Douglas,et al.  Recurrent neuronal circuits in the neocortex , 2007, Current Biology.

[42]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[43]  A. Klistorner,et al.  Separate magnocellular and parvocellular contributions from temporal analysis of the multifocal VEP , 1997, Vision Research.

[44]  Michael Bach,et al.  Summation of texture segregation across orientation and spatial frequency: electrophysiological and psychophysical findings , 2000, Vision Research.

[45]  Ankoor S. Shah,et al.  Functional anatomy and interaction of fast and slow visual pathways in macaque monkeys. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  E Kaplan,et al.  Contrast affects the transmission of visual information through the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  R. Elul.  The genesis of the EEG. , 1971, International review of neurobiology.

[48]  Vaegan,et al.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004) , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[49]  R. Lagasse,et al.  To see or not to see. , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[50]  P. Gouras,et al.  The human S-cone electroretinogram and its variation among subjects with and without L and M-cone function. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[51]  L. Leguire,et al.  Relationship among fMRI, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity , 2011, Brain Research.

[52]  V Zemon,et al.  Visual evoked potentials: evidence for lateral interactions. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  V. Bringuier,et al.  Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. , 1999, Science.

[55]  P Girard,et al.  Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Laminar analysis of bicuculline-induced epileptiform activity in area 17 of the awake macaque , 1990, Brain Research.

[57]  A M Halliday,et al.  The topography of occipital responses evoked by pattern-reversal in different areas of the visual field. , 1971, Vision research.

[58]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[59]  T. Loenneker,et al.  When more means less: a paradox BOLD response in human visual cortex. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[60]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  The human visual evoked potential: Analysis of components due to elementary and complex aspects of form , 1985, Vision Research.