The impact of personality, competence, and activities of academic entrepreneurs on technology transfer success

This empirical study, based on a national survey of more than 200 independent German technology transfer centres (TTC) of the Steinbeis-Foundation, assesses the degree of success which technology providers have in transferring technology to industry, taking into account the differing entrepreneurial behaviour of the centres' directors. The authors conceptualise entrepreneurial behaviour as promoting opportunities, building capabilities, and accomplishing objectives. TTCs act as demand driven developers of technologies and implementers of new technology applications. The results of an LISREL analysis show that entrepreneurial behaviour of a TTC director has a strong direct impact on the organisation's effectiveness. The study also reveals that directors of TTCs who perform entrepreneurial activities foster the organisations' network competence. The network competence is conceptualised as a TTC's processes of developing and utilising relationships with important external partners, e.g. technology recipients, research institutes, and governmental agencies. Furthermore, directors acting as entrepreneurs shape incentive systems that encourage R&D personnel to seek transfer opportunities and to collaborate with industrial enterprises. The network competence of TTCs and transfer-oriented incentive systems were found to have a significant influence on organisational effectiveness. Finally, our study reveals that the willingness to take risks, willingness to accept responsibility, need for achievement, and management competence are powerful predictors of TTC directors' entrepreneurial activities. Based on these findings, this study discusses several theoretical and practical management implications.

[1]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities , 1988 .

[2]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  N ACHIEVEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  L. Phillips.  Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[5]  C. F. Moore.  Understanding Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Definition and Model. , 1986 .

[6]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[7]  C. Baden‐Fuller,et al.  Creating corporate entrepreneurship , 1994 .

[8]  E. Roberts.  The personality and motivations of technological entrepreneurs , 1989 .

[9]  Charles S. Naiman,et al.  Overcoming the Barriers to Technology Transfer , 1976 .

[10]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[11]  M. Hobday,et al.  Strategies for Best Practice in Research and Technology Institutes , 1995 .

[12]  William E. Souder,et al.  Improving federal technology commercialization: Some recommendations from a field study , 1993 .

[13]  T. Begley,et al.  Psychological characteristics associated with performence in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses , 1987 .

[14]  Donald D. Myers,et al.  Technology transfer at land-grant universities , 1989 .

[15]  Jérôme Doutriaux,et al.  Growth pattern of academic entrepreneurial firms , 1987 .

[16]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical analysis in German high-tech industries , 1996 .

[17]  Karel J. Samsom,et al.  University scientists as entrepreneurs: a special case of technology transfer and high-tech venturing , 1993 .

[18]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[19]  R. Weijo.  Strategies for promoting technology transfer to the private sector , 1987 .

[20]  Charles S. Naiman,et al.  Making technology transfer happen , 1978 .

[21]  Technology transfer from government laboratories to industry: Canadian experience in the communications sector* , 1982 .

[22]  Gabriele Helfert,et al.  Relationship Marketing Teams , 1999 .

[23]  P. Jervis,et al.  Innovation and technology transfer — The roles and characteristics of individuals , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[25]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[26]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  The quality and effectiveness of marketing strategy: Effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict in intraorganizational relationships , 1996 .

[27]  H. Stevenson,et al.  A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management * , 1990 .

[28]  Joseph Morone,et al.  Problems and Opportunities in Technology Transfer from the National Laboratories to Industry , 1982 .

[29]  John B. Miner,et al.  Role of entrepreneurial task motivation in the growth of technologically innovative firms. , 1989 .

[30]  Richard B. Robinson,et al.  A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance , 1993 .

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  Cooperative research and development agreements (CRADAs) as technology transfer mechanisms , 1998 .

[32]  William B. Gartner,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation , 1985 .

[33]  Don Y. Lee,et al.  The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth* , 2001 .

[34]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Technology transfer in US government and university laboratories: advantages and disadvantages for participating laboratories , 1992 .

[35]  Thomas Ritter.  The Networking Company , 1999 .

[36]  Mike Wright,et al.  Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies , 2001 .

[37]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review , 1996 .

[38]  S. Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures , 2000 .

[39]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Developer-User Interaction and User Satisfaction in Internal Technology Transfer , 1993 .

[40]  J. Solleiro,et al.  Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation (UIC): a Mexican case , 1994 .

[41]  Hans Corsten,et al.  Technology transfer from universities to small and medium-sized enterprises — an empirical survey from the standpoint of such enterprises , 1987 .

[42]  David V. Gibson,et al.  Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based empirical analysis , 1991 .

[43]  Robert K. Carr,et al.  Doing technology transfer in federal laboratories (Part 1) , 1992 .

[44]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Theorizing about Entrepreneurship , 1992 .

[45]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[46]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of technology transfer from U.S. government R&D laboratories: impact of market orientation , 1992, Optifab.

[47]  John E. Ettlie,et al.  The commercialization of federally sponsored technological innovations , 1982 .

[48]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  A guide to the best technology-transfer practices , 1990 .

[49]  P. A. Abetti,et al.  Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance , 1990 .

[50]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  The technological base of the new enterprise , 1991 .

[51]  Prescott C. Ensign,et al.  New Venture Creation , 1994 .

[52]  M. A. Campion,et al.  The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management , 1994 .

[53]  William E. Souder,et al.  Measures of technology transfer effectiveness: key dimensions and differences in their use by sponsors, developers and adopters , 1995 .

[54]  José L. Encarnação,et al.  Technology transfer systems in the United States and Germany : lessons and perspectives , 1997 .

[55]  A. H. Rubenstein,et al.  Interorganizational transfer of technology: A study of adoption of NASA innovations , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[56]  William B. Gartner,et al.  A profile of new venture success and failure in an emerging industry , 1990 .