Tangential versus normal displacements of skin: relative effectiveness for producing tactile sensations

We investigated the relative effectiveness of tangential versus normal displacements of skin for producing tactile sensations. Subjects adjusted the magnitude of slow tangential and oblique displacements of a flat-ended, cylindrical, 1 mm diameter probe glued to the skin in order to match the perceived intensity of a reference displacement that indented the skin normal to the surface. At both the forearm and fingerpad, subjects chose tangential displacements only 0.3 to 0.6 times as large as the reference normal displacement, indicating a significantly higher sensitivity to tangential displacement. Based on measurements of the mechanical impedance of the skin to normal and tangential displacements, these results were also expressed in terms of forces. At the forearm, subjects were more sensitive to tangential forces than normal force. However, at the fingerpad, sensitivity to tangential forces was lower than sensitivity to normal force, due to the approximately five-fold greater stiffness of the fingerpad to tangential traction. These results provide guidance for development of tactile displays: (1) When an actuator is limited primarily in terms of peak displacement (e.g., the maximum strain of a ceramic piezoelectric actuator) then tangential stimulation is a superior choice for both body sites we tested. (2) When an actuator is limited primarily in terms of peak force (e.g., the stall torque of a DC micromotor) tangential stimulation is the superior choice for the hairy skin, but normal stimulation is the better choice on the fingerpad.

[1]  N. Wiener,et al.  Some Problems in Sensory Prosynthesis , 1949 .

[2]  K. Boman [On cutaneous sensitivity]. , 1960, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[3]  James C. Bliss,et al.  Optical-to-Tactile Image Conversion for the Blind , 1970 .

[4]  G. Brindley “Seeing” with Skin , 1973, Nature.

[5]  W. R. Gould,et al.  Cues Supporting Recognition of the Orientation or Direction of Movement of Tactile Stimuli , 1979 .

[6]  K. Horch,et al.  The neural signal for skin indentation depth. I. Changing indentations , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Greenspan,et al.  The influence of rate of skin indentation on threshold and suprathreshold tactile sensations. , 1984, Somatosensory research.

[8]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[9]  J. Craig Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  J. Greenspan Influence of velocity and direction of surface-parallel cutaneous stimuli on responses of mechanoreceptors in feline hairy skin. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A physiological method for relaying frictional information to a human teleoperator , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  B H Brown,et al.  Vibrotactile and electrotactile perception of time-varying pulse trains. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  M. Trulsson,et al.  Receptor encoding of moving tactile stimuli in humans. I. Temporal pattern of discharge of individual low-threshold mechanoreceptors , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Edin,et al.  Skin strain patterns provide kinaesthetic information to the human central nervous system. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  G. Essick,et al.  Receptor encoding of moving tactile stimuli in humans. II. The mean response of individual low-threshold mechanoreceptors to motion across the receptive field , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  The effects of static indentation on vibrotactile threshold. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Steven S. Hsiao,et al.  Control and Pattern Specification for a High Density Tactile Array , 1998, Dynamic Systems and Control.

[21]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Goodwin,et al.  Directional encoding of fingertip force by human tactile afferents. , 1999, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[23]  H. Kajimoto,et al.  Tactile Feeling Display using Functional Electrical Stimulation , 1999 .

[24]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  An integrated tactile/shear feedback array for stimulation of finger mechanoreceptor , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[25]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[26]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Tactile Display Device Using Distributed Lateral Skin Stretch , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[27]  Christopher R. Wagner,et al.  A compliant tactile display for teletaction , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[28]  M. Paré,et al.  Magnitude estimation of tangential force applied to the fingerpad , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  T. Diller Frequency response of human skin in vivo to mechanical stimulation , 2001 .

[30]  R. Johansson,et al.  Responses in glabrous skin mechanoreceptors during precision grip in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.