Promoter Sequence Determines the Relationship between Expression Level and Noise
暂无分享,去创建一个
Peter M. A. Sloot | Lucas B. Carey | Eran Segal | Jaap A. Kaandorp | David van Dijk | E. Segal | P. Sloot | D. van Dijk | L. Carey | J. Kaandorp | David van Dijk
[1] Paul J. Choi,et al. Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.
[2] T. Kepler,et al. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.
[3] Tsz-Leung To,et al. Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010, Science.
[4] E. O’Shea,et al. Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.
[5] M. Newton,et al. Differential control of Zap1-regulated genes in response to zinc deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, BMC Genomics.
[6] Mads Kærn,et al. Predictable trends in protein noise , 2006, Nature Genetics.
[7] F. Cross,et al. Nucleosome-depleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle. , 2010, Developmental cell.
[8] A. Tong,et al. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.
[9] Leah M. Octavio,et al. Epigenetic and Conventional Regulation Is Distributed among Activators of FLO11 Allowing Tuning of Population-Level Heterogeneity in Its Expression , 2009, PLoS genetics.
[10] Nir Friedman,et al. Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.
[11] D. Stillman,et al. The Zap1 transcriptional activator also acts as a repressor by binding downstream of the TATA box in ZRT2 , 2004, The EMBO journal.
[12] R. Segev,et al. GENERAL PROPERTIES OF THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL TIME-SERIES IN ESCHERICHIA COLI , 2011, Nature Genetics.
[13] A. van Oudenaarden,et al. Noise Propagation in Gene Networks , 2005, Science.
[14] N. Friedman,et al. Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.
[15] D. Dubnau,et al. Noise in Gene Expression Determines Cell Fate in Bacillus subtilis , 2007, Science.
[16] Klaus Aktories,et al. Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010 .
[17] J. Raser,et al. Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.
[18] Mads Kærn,et al. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.
[19] S. Leibler,et al. Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.
[20] N. Barkai,et al. Robustness of the BMP morphogen gradient in Drosophila embryonic patterning , 2022 .
[21] Bin Wu,et al. Real-Time Observation of Transcription Initiation and Elongation on an Endogenous Yeast Gene , 2011, Science.
[22] S. Benzer,et al. Induced synthesis of enzymes in bacteria analyzed at the cellular level. , 1953, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[23] C. Pesce,et al. Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.
[24] D. Winge,et al. Repression of ADH1 and ADH3 during zinc deficiency by Zap1‐induced intergenic RNA transcripts , 2006, The EMBO journal.
[25] Steven Hahn,et al. Structure and mechanism of the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[26] J. Collins,et al. Tuning and controlling gene expression noise in synthetic gene networks , 2010, Nucleic acids research.
[27] Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.
[28] L. Mirny,et al. Spatial effects on the speed and reliability of protein–DNA search , 2007, Nucleic acids research.
[29] Jané Kondev,et al. Transcriptional control of noise in gene expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] Nacho Molina,et al. Mammalian Genes Are Transcribed with Widely Different Bursting Kinetics , 2011, Science.
[31] Jianzhi Zhang,et al. Impact of gene expression noise on organismal fitness and the efficacy of natural selection , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32] Antoine Buetti-Dinh,et al. Control and signal processing by transcriptional interference , 2009, Molecular systems biology.
[33] Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al. Transcript counting in single cells reveals dynamics of rDNA transcription , 2010, Molecular systems biology.
[34] D. Kirschner,et al. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.
[35] Yaniv Lubling,et al. Compensation for differences in gene copy number among yeast ribosomal proteins is encoded within their promoters. , 2011, Genome research.
[36] K. Shearwin,et al. Transcriptional interference by RNA polymerase pausing and dislodgement of transcription factors , 2011, Transcription.
[37] Justin A. Pruneski,et al. Intergenic transcription causes repression by directing nucleosome assembly. , 2011, Genes & development.
[38] F Sherman,et al. mRNA sequences influencing translation and the selection of AUG initiator codons in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, Molecular microbiology.
[39] Bryan J Venters,et al. A comprehensive genomic binding map of gene and chromatin regulatory proteins in Saccharomyces. , 2011, Molecular cell.
[40] J. Derisi,et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise , 2006, Nature.
[41] D. Tranchina,et al. Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.
[42] E. O’Shea,et al. Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.
[43] Rob Phillips,et al. Effect of Promoter Architecture on the Cell-to-Cell Variability in Gene Expression , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[44] D. Larson,et al. Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.