Spatial structure arising from neighbour-dependent bias in collective cell movement

Mathematical models of collective cell movement often neglect the effects of spatial structure, such as clustering, on the population dynamics. Typically, they assume that individuals interact with one another in proportion to their average density (the mean-field assumption) which means that cell–cell interactions occurring over short spatial ranges are not accounted for. However, in vitro cell culture studies have shown that spatial correlations can play an important role in determining collective behaviour. Here, we take a combined experimental and modelling approach to explore how individual-level interactions give rise to spatial structure in a moving cell population. Using imaging data from in vitro experiments, we quantify the extent of spatial structure in a population of 3T3 fibroblast cells. To understand how this spatial structure arises, we develop a lattice-free individual-based model (IBM) and simulate cell movement in two spatial dimensions. Our model allows an individual’s direction of movement to be affected by interactions with other cells in its neighbourhood, providing insights into how directional bias generates spatial structure. We consider how this behaviour scales up to the population level by using the IBM to derive a continuum description in terms of the dynamics of spatial moments. In particular, we account for spatial correlations between cells by considering dynamics of the second spatial moment (the average density of pairs of cells). Our numerical results suggest that the moment dynamics description can provide a good approximation to averaged simulation results from the underlying IBM. Using our in vitro data, we estimate parameters for the model and show that it can generate similar spatial structure to that observed in a 3T3 fibroblast cell population.

[1]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Modelling the movement of interacting cell populations: a moment dynamics approach. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Michael J. Plank,et al.  Spatial Point Processes and Moment Dynamics in the Life Sciences: A Parsimonious Derivation and Some Extensions , 2015, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Relaxation Projections and the Method of Moments , 1999 .

[4]  D. L. Sean McElwain,et al.  How much information can be obtained from tracking the position of the leading edge in a scratch assay? , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[5]  J. N. Kay,et al.  MEGF10 AND 11 MEDIATE HOMOTYPIC INTERACTIONS REQUIRED FOR MOSAIC SPACING OF RETINAL NEURONS , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Richard Law,et al.  Beetles in fragmented woodlands: a formal framework for dynamics of movement in ecological landscapes , 2000 .

[7]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis , 1998, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[8]  J. Illian,et al.  Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory , 2009 .

[9]  H M Byrne,et al.  Non-local models for the formation of hepatocyte-stellate cell aggregates. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Maria Bruna,et al.  Excluded-volume effects in the diffusion of hard spheres. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  D. Murrell,et al.  Local Spatial Structure and Predator‐Prey Dynamics: Counterintuitive Effects of Prey Enrichment , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[12]  S. Pacala,et al.  Modeling and analysis of stochastic invasion processes , 2000, Journal of mathematical biology.

[13]  T. Shaw,et al.  Wound repair at a glance , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[14]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[15]  Lu Lu,et al.  Pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 regulates the patterning of retinal mosaics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  POPULATION GROWTH IN SPACE AND TIME: SPATIAL LOGISTIC EQUATIONS , 2003 .

[17]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  The Radial Distribution Function in Liquids , 1942 .

[18]  Erez Raz,et al.  Chemokine signaling in embryonic cell migration: a fisheye view , 2009, Development.

[19]  Barry D. Hughes,et al.  Modelling Directional Guidance and Motility Regulation in Cell Migration , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[20]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  A general mathematical framework for the analysis of spatiotemporal point processes , 2013, Theoretical Ecology.

[21]  Christophe Deroulers,et al.  Modeling tumor cell migration: From microscopic to macroscopic models. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Alex James,et al.  Spatial moment dynamics for collective cell movement incorporating a neighbour-dependent directional bias , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  G. Corfas,et al.  Extracellular Signals That Regulate the Tangential Migration of Olfactory Bulb Neuronal Precursors: Inducers, Inhibitors, and Repellents , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Geoffrey W. Stevens,et al.  Cell migration and proliferation during monolayer formation and wound healing , 2009 .

[25]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  Matthew J. Simpson,et al.  Spectral analysis of pair-correlation bandwidth: application to cell biology images , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[27]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns , 2008 .

[28]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  A multiscale maximum entropy moment closure for locally regulated space–time point process models of population dynamics , 2011, Journal of mathematical biology.

[29]  Bai-Lian Li,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2002 .

[30]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[31]  A. Kashina,et al.  Cell biology of embryonic migration. , 2008, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[32]  Ruth E Baker,et al.  The importance of volume exclusion in modelling cellular migration , 2015, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Physical forces during collective cell migration , 2009 .

[34]  R. Fisher THE WAVE OF ADVANCE OF ADVANTAGEOUS GENES , 1937 .

[35]  M J Simpson,et al.  Distinguishing between mechanisms of cell aggregation using pair-correlation functions. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Søren Vedel,et al.  Migration of cells in a social context , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  K. Painter,et al.  Volume-filling and quorum-sensing in models for chemosensitive movement , 2002 .

[38]  J. Kirkwood Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .

[39]  Matthew J. Simpson,et al.  Cell invasion with proliferation mechanisms motivated bytime-lapse data , 2010 .

[40]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Quantifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[41]  B. Bolker,et al.  Using Moment Equations to Understand Stochastically Driven Spatial Pattern Formation in Ecological Systems , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[42]  R. Grima,et al.  Many-body theory of chemotactic cell-cell interactions. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Michael J Plank,et al.  On the growth of locally interacting plants: differential equations for the dynamics of spatial moments. , 2013, Ecology.

[44]  M. Carlier,et al.  Regulation of actin assembly associated with protrusion and adhesion in cell migration. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[45]  Ramon Grima,et al.  A continuum approximation to an off-lattice individual-cell based model of cell migration and adhesion. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Models of collective cell behaviour with crowding effects: comparing lattice-based and lattice-free approaches , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[47]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  On moment closures for population dynamics in continuous space. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Experimental and Modelling Investigation of Monolayer Development with Clustering , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[49]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Contact inhibition and malignancy , 1979, Nature.

[50]  Shin Ishii,et al.  Collective Cell Migration , 2013 .

[51]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Modelling collective cell behaviour , 2014 .

[52]  K Zygourakis,et al.  Analysis of endothelial cell locomotion: Differential effects of motility and contact inhibition , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[53]  Paul Martin,et al.  Wound Healing--Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration , 1997, Science.

[54]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Lattice-free descriptions of collective motion with crowding and adhesion. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[55]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces , 2010, Nature materials.

[56]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Epidermal growth factor alters fibroblast migration speed and directional persistence reciprocally and in a matrix-dependent manner. , 1998, Journal of cell science.

[57]  P. Haase Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction , 1995 .