Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: Empirical and formal issues

This paper discusses vowel epenthesis in loanwords from both an empirical and a formal linguistic perspective and argues that epenthesis patterns are more complex than usually assumed with respect to vowel quality. A statistical analysis of several large loanword corpora in the languages Shona, Sranan, Samoan and Kinyarwanda reveals that the quality of the epenthetic vowel results from the complex interaction of three distinct processes, vowel harmony, local assimilation to the preceding consonant and default insertion. Claims that a default (unmarked or perceptually least salient) vowel is usually inserted are thus challenged. The results of the statistical exploration of loanword corpora are formalized in an Optimality-Theoretic approach which makes crucial reference to autosegmental representations. The relative ranking of constraints against feature insertion and against spreading decide over the preferred strategy in a language. These constraints are scalar, accounting for the preference of different strategies in different environments, and grounded in universal markedness and prominence hierarchies, thus formalizing the observation that across corpora, certain types of spreading are preferred while others are dispreferred. The role of perception is argued to play only a minor role in vowel epenthesis, given the high amount of variation both across and within languages which is not sufficiently explained by notions of salience or perceptibility alone

[1]  David Odden,et al.  ADJACENCY PARAMETERS IN PHONOLOGY , 1994 .

[2]  Cheryl Cydney Zoll,et al.  Parsing Below the Segment in a Constraint-Based Framework , 1998 .

[3]  Paul Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar ; CU-CS-696-93 , 1993 .

[4]  Ingo Plag,et al.  EPENTHESIS, DELETION AND THE EMERGENCE OF THE OPTIMAL SYLLABLE IN CREOLE , 2001 .

[5]  J. Khumalo A preliminary survey of Zulu adoptives , 1984 .

[6]  S. Davis,et al.  Phonetics versus phonology: English word final /s/ in Korean loanword phonology , 2006 .

[7]  Allison N. Adler,et al.  Faithfulness and perception in loanword adaptation: A case study from Hawaiian , 2006 .

[8]  Vers un Modele Concret de la Phonologie des Emprunts , 1982, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[9]  John Alderete,et al.  Derived Environment Effects in OT , 1998 .

[10]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Issues in loanword adaptation: A case study from Thai , 2006 .

[11]  Ernest Rugwa Byarushengo Strategies in Loan Phonology , 1976 .

[12]  H. Batibo Loanword clusters nativization rules in Tswana and Swahili: a comparative study , 1996 .

[13]  Elizabeth Hume,et al.  Coronal consonant, front vowel parallels in Maltese , 1996 .

[14]  P. Lacy,et al.  Correspondence and epenthetic quality , 1999 .

[15]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  The internal organization of phonological segments , 2005 .

[16]  Carole Paradis,et al.  Category Preservation and Proximity versus Phonetic Approximation in Loanword Adaptation , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Phonology In Generative Grammar , 1994 .

[18]  Diana Archangeli,et al.  Language - Particular Underspecification : Gengbe /e/ and Yoruba /i/ , 1989 .

[19]  Paul Smolensky,et al.  Typological Consequences of Local Constraint Conjunction , 2002 .

[20]  Jerzy Rubach,et al.  Glide and Glottal Stop Insertion in Slavic Languages: A DOT Analysis , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[21]  Moira Yip,et al.  The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology , 2006 .

[22]  E. B. Brinich,et al.  Adoption and Adaptation , 1982, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[23]  Haruo Kubozono Prosodic Structure of Loanwords in Japanese: Syllable Structure, Accent and Morphology( Aspects of Loanword Phonology) , 2002 .

[24]  I. Plag,et al.  PHONOLOGICAL RESTRUCTURING IN CREOLE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARAGOGE IN SRANAN , 1999 .

[25]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[26]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Salience and similarity in loanword adaptation: a case study from Fijian , 2007 .

[27]  K. Demuth,et al.  Vowel epenthesis in loanword adaptation: representational and phonetic considerations , 2006 .

[28]  Richard Wiese,et al.  The Phonology of German , 1996 .

[29]  Christine Haunz The role of speech perception in the adaptation of loanwords , 1995 .

[30]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[31]  Kersti Börjars,et al.  Markedness in phonology and in syntax: the problem of grounding , 2006 .

[32]  Elizabeth Hume,et al.  Front Vowels, Coronal Consonants and Their Interaction in Nonlinear Phonology , 1994 .

[33]  Akinbiyi Akinlabi Underspecification and the phonology of Yoruba /r/ , 1993 .

[34]  Douglas Pulleyblank,et al.  YORUBA VOWEL PATTERNS: DERIVING ASYMMETRIES BY THE TENSION BETWEEN OPPOSING CONSTRAINTS , 1998 .

[35]  Junko Ito,et al.  Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory , 1995 .

[36]  Carole Paradis,et al.  The Inadequacy of Filters and Faithfulness in Loanword Adaptation , 1996 .

[37]  Monik Charette,et al.  Conditions on Phonological Government , 1991 .

[38]  Carole Paradis,et al.  Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[39]  B. Laks,et al.  Current Trends in Phonology : Models and Methods , 1996 .

[40]  Martin Krämer Vowel Harmony and Correspondence Theory , 2003 .

[41]  Douglas Pulleyblank,et al.  Vocalic underspecification in Yoruba , 1988 .

[42]  Samuel Jay Keyser,et al.  CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable , 1988 .