Comparison of Magnetic Susceptibility Tensor and Diffusion Tensor of the Brain.

Susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) provides a novel approach for noninvasive assessment of the white matter pathways of the brain. Using mouse brain ex vivo, we compared STI with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), in terms of tensor values, principal tensor values, anisotropy values, and tensor orientations. Despite the completely different biophysical underpinnings, magnetic susceptibility tensors and diffusion tensors show many similarities in the tensor and principal tensor images, for example, the tensors perpendicular to the fiber direction have the highest gray-white matter contrast, and the largest principal tensor is along the fiber direction. Comparison to DTI fractional anisotropy, the susceptibility anisotropy provides much higher sensitivity to the chemical composition of the white matter, especially myelin. The high sensitivity can be further enhanced with the perfusion of ProHance, a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Regarding the tensor orientations, the direction of the largest principal susceptibility tensor agrees with that of diffusion tensors in major white matter fiber bundles. The STI fiber tractography can reconstruct the fiber pathways for the whole corpus callosum and for white matter fiber bundles that are in close contact but in different orientations. There are some differences between susceptibility and diffusion tensor orientations, which are likely due to the limitations in the current STI reconstruction. With the development of more accurate reconstruction methods, STI holds the promise for probing the white matter micro-architectures with more anatomical details and higher chemical sensitivity.

[1]  Bing Wu,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of human brain in vivo and its molecular underpinnings , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  Dong Zhou,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy: Cylindrical symmetry from macroscopically ordered anisotropic molecules and accuracy of MRI measurements using few orientations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  Chunlei Liu Susceptibility tensor imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Xu Li,et al.  Mapping magnetic susceptibility anisotropies of white matter in vivo in the human brain at 7T , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Bulthuis,et al.  NMR of partially aligned liquids: magnetic susceptibility anisotropies and dielectric properties , 1984 .

[6]  J H Prestegard,et al.  Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: information for structure determination in solution. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  A. Rosato,et al.  Partial Orientation of Oxidized and Reduced Cytochrome b5 at High Magnetic Fields: Magnetic Susceptibility Anisotropy Contributions and Consequences for Protein Solution Structure Determination , 1998 .

[8]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Morphologic phenotyping with MR microscopy: the visible mouse. , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  Peter T Fox,et al.  Three‐pool model of white matter , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Ferdinand Schweser,et al.  Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  C. Lebel,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter tract evolution over the lifespan , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Hangyi Jiang,et al.  DtiStudio: Resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking , 2006, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[14]  Wei Li,et al.  3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[15]  Bing Wu,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  Bing Wu,et al.  Fast and tissue-optimized mapping of magnetic susceptibility and T2* with multi-echo and multi-shot spirals , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  Jie Luo,et al.  Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging — Signal model and derived contrasts: T2*, T1, Phase, SWI, T1f, FST2*and T2*-SWI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  Lounila,et al.  Effects of orientational order and particle size on the NMR line positions of lipoproteins. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[19]  M. Fukunaga,et al.  Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Bing Wu,et al.  High-field (9.4T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. Yablonskiy,et al.  Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.