Computer-Aided Evaluation of Screening Mammograms Based on Local Texture Models

We propose a new approach to diagnostic evaluation of screening mammograms based on local statistical texture models. The local evaluation tool has the form of a multivariate probability density of gray levels in a suitably chosen search window. First, the density function in the form of Gaussian mixture is estimated from data obtained by scanning of the mammogram with the search window. Then we evaluate the estimated mixture at each position and display the corresponding log-likelihood value as a gray level at the window center. The resulting log-likelihood image closely correlates with the structural details of the original mammogram and emphasizes unusual places. We assume that, in parallel use, the log-likelihood image may provide additional information to facilitate the identification of malignant lesions as untypical locations of high novelty.

[1]  H. Storm,et al.  Risk of contralateral breast cancer in Denmark 1943-80. , 1986, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  Michael Brady,et al.  Novelty detection for the identification of masses in mammograms , 1995 .

[3]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Color Texture Segmentation by Decomposition of Gaussian Mixture Model , 2006, CIARP.

[6]  F. Cheevasuvit,et al.  Contrast enhancement using multipeak histogram equalization with brightness preserving , 1998, IEEE. APCCAS 1998. 1998 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems. Microelectronics and Integrating Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX242).

[7]  Jeffrey W Hoffmeister,et al.  Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer‐aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology , 2005, Cancer.

[8]  M. Haindl,et al.  A Discrete Mixtures Colour Texture Model , 2002 .

[9]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[10]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  P. Sajda,et al.  Detection, synthesis and compression in mammographic image analysis with a hierarchical image probability model , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[12]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Detection of Breast Tumor Boundaries Using ISO-Intensity Contours and Dynamic Thresholding , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  A statistical model of texture for medical image synthesis and analysis , 2003 .

[14]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[15]  R. L. Birdwell Screening Mammography–detected Cancers: Sensitivity of a Computer-aided Detection System Applied to Full-Field Digital Mammograms , 2008 .

[16]  T. Rissanen,et al.  Mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer. , 1995, Acta radiologica.

[17]  H P Chan,et al.  Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[18]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[19]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[21]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Segmentation of suspicious densities in digital mammograms. , 2001, Medical physics.

[22]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  O. Nevalainen,et al.  Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[24]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[25]  P. Somol A Statistical Approach to Local Evaluation of a Single Texture Image , 2007 .

[26]  Nico Karssemeijer Use of Prompt Magnitude in Computer Aided Detection of Masses in Mammograms , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[27]  H P Chan,et al.  Automated detection of breast masses on mammograms using adaptive contrast enhancement and texture classification. , 1996, Medical physics.

[28]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  EM Texture Segmentation of Mammographic Images , 2003 .

[29]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[30]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[31]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[32]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  A Generative Statistical Model of Mammographic Appearance , 2004 .

[33]  P. G. Tahoces,et al.  Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms. , 1996, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[34]  Michal Haindl,et al.  Texture modelling by discrete distribution mixtures , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[35]  Y H Chang,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[36]  D Brzakovic,et al.  An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. , 1990, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[37]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Hiroshi Fujita,et al.  Classifying Masses as Benign or Malignant Based on Co-occurrence Matrix Textures: A Comparison Study of Different Gray Level Quantizations , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[39]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  A Subspace Approach to Texture Modelling by Using Gaussian Mixtures , 2006, 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'06).

[40]  G F ROBBINS,et al.  Bilateral primary breast cancers. A prospective clinicopathological study , 1964 .

[41]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms , 1998, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[42]  K Doi,et al.  Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[43]  I. Seidman,et al.  Bilateral primary breast cancer. , 1976, JAMA.

[44]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey , 2003, Pattern Recognit..