Derivation of the complete Gutenberg‐Richter magnitude‐frequency relation using the principle of scale invariance

The purpose of this paper is to show that the various observational parameters characterizing the statistical properties of earthquakes can be related to each other. The fundamental postulate which is used to obtain quantitative results is the idea that the physics of earthquake occurrence scales as a power law, similar to properties one often sees in critical phenomena. When the physics of earthquake occurrence is exactly scale invariant, b = 1, and it can be shown as a consequence that earthquakes in any magnitude band Δm cover the same area in unit time. This result therefore implies the existence of a “universal” covering interval τT, which is here called the “cycle interval.” Using this idea, the complete Gutenberg-Richter relation is derived in terms of the fault area ST, which is available to events of any given size, the average stress drop ΔσT for events occurring on ST, the interval τT for events of stress drop ΔσT to cover an area ST, and the scaling exponent α, which is proportional to the b value. Observationally, the average recurrence time interval for great earthquakes, or perhaps equivalently, the recurrence interval for characteristic earthquakes on a fault segment, is a measure of the cycle interval τT. The exponent α may depend on time, but scale invariance (self similarity) demands that α = 1. It is shown in the appendix that the A value in the Gutenberg-Richter relation can be written in terms of ST, τT, ΔσT, and the parameter α. The b value is either 1 or 1.5 (depending on the geometry of the fault zone) multiplied by α.

[1]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[2]  W. H. Bakun,et al.  The Parkfield, California, Earthquake Prediction Experiment , 1985, Science.

[3]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Application of an inhomogeneous stress (patch) model to complex subduction zone earthquakes: A discrete interaction matrix approach , 1987 .

[4]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[5]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  A stochastic fault model: 1. Static case , 1980 .

[6]  Charles F. Richter,et al.  Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration , 1942 .

[7]  Richard H. Jahns,et al.  Holocene activity of the San Andreas fault at Wallace Creek , 1984 .

[8]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  b values and ω−γ seismic source models: Implications for tectonic stress variations along active crustal fault zones and the estimation of high‐frequency strong ground motion , 1979 .

[9]  M. Wyss Towards a Physical Understanding of the Earthquake Frequency Distribution , 1973 .

[10]  J. Lomnitz-Adler Asperity models and characteristic earthquakes , 1985 .

[11]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  Fault behavior and characteristic earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1984 .

[12]  Shang‐keng Ma Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena , 1976 .

[13]  Geoffrey C. P. King,et al.  The accommodation of large strains in the upper lithosphere of the earth and other solids by self-similar fault systems: the geometrical origin of b-Value , 1983 .

[14]  L. Knopoff,et al.  Stochastic synthesis of earthquake catalogs , 1981 .

[15]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  A more precise chronology of earthquakes produced by the San Andreas fault in southern California , 1989 .

[16]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Magnitude‐frequency relation for small earthquakes: A clue to the origin of ƒmax of large earthquakes , 1987 .

[17]  D. H. Harlow,et al.  Seismicity and eruptive activity at Fuego volcano, Guatemala: February 1975-January 1977 , 1984 .

[18]  D. Andrews A stochastic fault model: 2. Time‐dependent case , 1981 .

[19]  S. K. Singh,et al.  The 1985 Central Chile Earthquake: A Repeat of Previous Great Earthquakes in the Region? , 1986, Science.

[20]  J. Rundle A physical model for earthquakes: 2. Application to southern California , 1988 .

[21]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Earthquake stress drops, ambient tectonic stresses and stresses that drive plate motions , 1977 .

[22]  M. Ando Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the nankai trough, Japan , 1975 .

[23]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Seismicity of the Earth , 1970, Nature.