Kinematic parameters of signed verbs.

PURPOSE Sign language users recruit physical properties of visual motion to convey linguistic information. Research on American Sign Language (ASL) indicates that signers systematically use kinematic features (e.g., velocity, deceleration) of dominant hand motion for distinguishing specific semantic properties of verb classes in production ( Malaia & Wilbur, 2012a) and process these distinctions as part of the phonological structure of these verb classes in comprehension ( Malaia, Ranaweera, Wilbur, & Talavage, 2012). These studies are driven by the event visibility hypothesis by Wilbur (2003), who proposed that such use of kinematic features should be universal to sign language (SL) by the grammaticalization of physics and geometry for linguistic purposes. In a prior motion capture study, Malaia and Wilbur (2012a) lent support for the event visibility hypothesis in ASL, but there has not been quantitative data from other SLs to test the generalization to other languages. METHOD The authors investigated the kinematic parameters of predicates in Croatian Sign Language ( Hrvatskom Znakovnom Jeziku [HZJ]). RESULTS Kinematic features of verb signs were affected both by event structure of the predicate (semantics) and phrase position within the sentence (prosody). CONCLUSION The data demonstrate that kinematic features of motion in HZJ verb signs are recruited to convey morphological and prosodic information. This is the first crosslinguistic motion capture confirmation that specific kinematic properties of articulator motion are grammaticalized in other SLs to express linguistic features.

[1]  Evguenia Malaia,et al.  Event segmentation in a visual language: Neural bases of processing American Sign Language predicates , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  Peter Cole,et al.  An Event-Based Account of -kan Constructions in Standard Indonesian , 2008 .

[3]  Negative structures in Croatian Sign Language (HZJ) , 2010 .

[4]  Evie Malaia,et al.  Kinematic Signatures of Telic and Atelic Events in ASL Predicates , 2012, Language and speech.

[5]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Pronominal system in Croatian Sign Language , 2006 .

[6]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Phonological parameters in Croatian Sign Language , 2006 .

[7]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Perfectivity as aspectual definiteness: Time and the event in Russian , 2008 .

[8]  Martha E. Tyrone,et al.  Location in ASL: Insights from phonetic variation. , 2012, Sign language and linguistics.

[9]  Ronnie B Wilbur,et al.  Information status and word order in Croatian Sign Language , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[10]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Sign Language Research at the Millennium , 2000 .

[11]  P. Blackburn,et al.  Book Reviews: The Proper Treatment of Events, by Michiel van Lambalgen and Fritz Hamm , 2005, CL.

[12]  C. Mauk,et al.  Undershoot in two modalities: evidence from fast speech and fast signing , 2003 .

[13]  Michel DeGraff Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development , 2001 .

[14]  K. Green Sign Boundaries in American Sign Language , 2013 .

[15]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[16]  Ronnie B Wilbur,et al.  Productive reduplication in a fundamentally monosyllabic language. , 2009, Language sciences.

[17]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Interrogative structures in Croatian Sign Language : Polar and content questions , 2006 .

[18]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  COMPLEX PREDICATES INVOLVING EVENTS, TIME AND ASPECT: IS THIS WHY SIGN LANGUAGES LOOK SO SIMILAR? , 2007 .

[19]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Human Brain Activity Time-Locked to Narrative Event Boundaries , 2007, Psychological science.

[20]  G. Mathur,et al.  Verb Agreement as a Linguistic Innovation in Signed Languages , 2007 .

[21]  J. Zacks,et al.  Using movement and intentions to understand human activity , 2009, Cognition.

[22]  J. Kegl Creation through contact : Sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua , 1999 .

[23]  Ronnie B. Wilbur Sign Languages: The semantics–phonology interface , 2010 .

[24]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Infants parse dynamic action. , 2001, Child development.

[25]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers. , 2009, Applied psycholinguistics.

[26]  R. Wilbur,et al.  Stress in A SL: Empirical Evidence and Linguistic I ssues , 1999, Language and speech.

[27]  Evguenia Malaia,et al.  Contributions of Sign Language Research to Gesture Understanding: What Can Multimodal Computational Systems Learn from Sign Language Research , 2008, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[28]  Kearsy Cormier,et al.  Grammaticization of indexic signs : how American Sign Language expresses numerosity , 2002 .

[29]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  What sign languages show , 2012 .

[30]  Martha E. Tyrone,et al.  Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[31]  Paola Pietrandrea,et al.  Verbal and Signed Languages: Comparing Structures, Constructs and Methodologies , 2007 .

[32]  Michael Grosvald,et al.  Long-Distance Coarticulation: A Production and Perception Study of English and American Sign Language , 2009 .

[33]  Z. Vendler Linguistics in Philosophy , 1967 .

[34]  Patricia Siple,et al.  Understanding language through sign language research , 1978 .

[35]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The syntax of event structure , 1991, Cognition.

[36]  R. Wilbur,et al.  A reanalysis of reduplication in American Sign Language , 2005 .

[37]  Evguenia Malaia,et al.  ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences , 2009, Brain and Language.

[38]  Van Valin,et al.  Some universals of verb semantics , 2006 .

[39]  R. Jackendoff Parts and boundaries , 1991, Cognition.

[40]  Evguenia Malaia,et al.  Analysis of ASL Motion Capture Data towards Identification of Verb Type , 2008, STEP.

[41]  Atsushi Fujimori The association of sound with meaning: The case of telicity , 2012 .

[42]  Terry Janzen,et al.  ASL sign lowering as undershoot: A corpus study , 2011 .

[43]  Evie Malaia,et al.  Sign Languages: Contribution to Neurolinguistics from Cross-Modal Research. , 2010, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[44]  Robin L. Thompson,et al.  The Road to Language Learning Is Iconic , 2012, Psychological science.

[45]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[46]  Diane Brentari,et al.  A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology , 1999 .

[47]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Word order in Croatian Sign Language , 2006 .

[49]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface , 2000 .

[50]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event perception: a mind-brain perspective. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  A. Senghas,et al.  Children Creating Language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language Acquired a Spatial Grammar , 2001, Psychological science.

[52]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Effects of Verbal Event Structure on Online Thematic Role Assignment , 2012, Journal of psycholinguistic research.