Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension

Abstract The Indexical Hypothesis describes how sentences become meaningful through grounding their interpretation in action. We develop support for the hypothesis by examining how people understand innovative denominal verbs, that is, verbs made from nouns and first encountered by participants within the experiment (e.g., to crutch). Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that different syntactic constructions provide scenes or goals that influence the meaning created for the innovative verbs. Experiment 3 used reading time to demonstrate that people also consider possible interactions with the objects underlying the verbs (i.e., the affordances of the objects) when creating meaning. Experiment 4 used a property verification procedure to demonstrate that the affordances derived from the objects depend on the situation-specific actions needed to complete the goal specified by the syntactic construction. Thus the evidence supports a specific type of interaction between syntax and semantics that leads to understanding: The syntax specifies a general scene, and the affordances of objects are used to specify the scene in detail sufficient to take action.

[1]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  When Nouns Surface as Verbs , 1979 .

[2]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[4]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[6]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[7]  J. Gleason.  The development of language , 1985 .

[8]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive , 1987, Cognition.

[9]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[10]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar” , 1988 .

[11]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[12]  W. Kintsch.  The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.

[13]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[14]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[15]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[16]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation , 1989 .

[17]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[18]  The Learnability and Acquistion of Dative Alternation in English , 1989 .

[19]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[20]  Gerry Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[21]  G. Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[22]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Children use syntax to learn verb meanings , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  Michelle A. Hollander,et al.  Affectedness and direct objects: The role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure , 1991, Cognition.

[24]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access , 1991 .

[25]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[26]  A. Goldberg.  The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction , 1992 .

[27]  Esther Dromi,et al.  Language and cognition : a developmental perspective , 1993 .

[28]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Analogical processes in comprehension: Simulation of a mental model. , 1994 .

[29]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[30]  Cynthia L Fisher,et al.  Structure and meaning in the verb lexicon: Input for a syntax-aided verb learning procedure , 1994 .

[31]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The Handbook of Child Language , 1995 .

[32]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[33]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Communities, commonalities, and communication. , 1996 .

[34]  C. Fisher.  Structural Limits on Verb Mapping: The Role of Analogy in Children's Interpretations of Sentences , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[37]  Susan Goldin,et al.  The nature and functions of gesture in children's communication , 1998 .

[38]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Motion-Verb Generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of Language and Syntax , 1998 .

[39]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  An introduction to latent semantic analysis , 1998 .

[41]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[42]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Rule- and idiosyncratically derived denominal verbs: Effects on language production and comprehension , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Speech and gesture integration , 1998 .

[44]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction , 1999 .

[45]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Indexical understanding of instructions , 1999 .

[46]  T. Landauer.  Latent semantic analysis: A theory of the psychology of language and mind , 1999 .

[47]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  The emergence of language. , 1999 .

[48]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[49]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Discourse and agency in school science laboratories , 1999 .

[50]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Early syntactic development: A Construction Grammar approach. , 1999 .

[51]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[52]  G. Fauconnier.  Mental spaces , language modalities , and conceptual integration , 2002 .