Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems

[1]  D. Mitrany.  Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[2]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005, JAMA.

[3]  Yves-Chantal Gagnon,et al.  The Case Study as Research Method , 2009 .

[4]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[5]  Francine Toye,et al.  What is quality in qualitative health research? , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[6]  Marion J. Ball,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics , 2006 .

[7]  Tony Cornford,et al.  The Role of Technology in Shaping the Professional Future of Community Pharmacists: The Case of the Electronic Prescription Service in the English National Health Service , 2011, Researching the Future in Information Systems.

[8]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[9]  P. Rabinow.  Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment , 2003 .

[10]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[12]  E. Coiera,et al.  Research Paper: Building a National Health IT System from the Middle Out , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Sociotechnical changing in healthcare. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  N. Wallerstein.  Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[16]  Dimitra I. Petrakaki,et al.  Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Karen Barad.  Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[18]  P. Bendtsen,et al.  Prescribing benzodiazepines--a critical incident study of a physician dilemma. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[19]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Practice? It’s a Matter of Taste! , 2009 .

[20]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Medical Informatics , 1997, Computers and Medicine.

[21]  Marc Berg,et al.  Evaluation of patient care information systems: theory and practice , 2003 .

[22]  R. Lilford,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access the Stepped Wedge Trial Design: a Systematic Review , 2022 .

[23]  A. Hassey.  The National Programme for IT in the NHS. , 2005, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[24]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in london. , 2009, The Milbank quarterly.

[25]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Why national eHealth programs need dead philosophers: Wittgensteinian reflections on policymakers' reluctance to learn from history. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[26]  Fadhel Kaboub.  Realistic Evaluation , 2004 .

[27]  Dimitra I. Petrakaki,et al.  The Long and Winding Road: An Independent Evaluation of the Implementation and Adoption of the National Health Service Care Records Service (NHS CRS) in Secondary Care in England , 2011 .

[28]  Juliet M. Corbin,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2008 .

[29]  Tony Cornford,et al.  Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating an information system , 1994 .

[30]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  Will Venters,et al.  Journey to DOR: A Retro Science-Fiction Story on Researching ePrescribing , 2011, Researching the Future in Information Systems.

[32]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[33]  B Kaplan,et al.  People, Organizational, and Social Issues: Evaluation as an exemplar , 2002, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[34]  J. Hendy,et al.  Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  S. Brennan.  The NHS IT Project: The Biggest Computer Programme in the World... Ever! , 2005 .

[36]  Daniel Gozman,et al.  Transforming the English NHS using information technology: the story so far , 2011 .

[37]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Can We Systematically Review Studies That Evaluate Complex Interventions? , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[38]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  The NHS Care Record Service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. , 2009, Informatics in primary care.

[39]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Contextual influences on technology use mediation: a comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  R. Hanka,et al.  Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges , 1998, BMJ.

[42]  Dimitra I. Petrakaki,et al.  Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from a prospective national evaluation in 'early adopter' hospitals , 2011 .

[43]  Andrea Cornwall,et al.  What is participatory research? , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[44]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Why Do Evaluations of eHealth Programs Fail? An Alternative Set of Guiding Principles , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[45]  M. R. Jones,et al.  “Computers can land people on Mars, why can’t they get them to work in a hospital?” , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[46]  M. Calnan,et al.  Policy makers’ perceptions on the use of evidence from evaluations , 2011 .

[47]  Christian Nøhr,et al.  From safe systems to patient safety. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[48]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[49]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Model Formulation: Contextual Implementation Model: A Framework for Assisting Clinical Information System Implementations , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[50]  M Berg,et al.  Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Patient Care Information System Evaluation , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[51]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[52]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[53]  M. Young,et al.  Health services research , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[54]  M Eccles,et al.  Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. , 2000, Family practice.

[55]  M Berg,et al.  Same Systems, Different Outcomes , 2006, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[56]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  Peter Short,et al.  Connecting for health. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[59]  Jeremy C. Wyatt,et al.  The case for randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of clinical information systems , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[60]  Robin Williams,et al.  Research Commentary - Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementation Study: How (and Why) We Should Study the Biography of Packaged Enterprise Solutions , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  D. Protti.  Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. , 2007, Healthcare Quarterly.

[62]  D. Swinglehurst,et al.  Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. , 2009, The Milbank quarterly.

[63]  F. Baum,et al.  Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[64]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  THE DEVIL ’ S IN THE DETAIL Final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and HealthSpace programmes Executive summary , 2010 .

[65]  D. Chou.  Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care , 2012 .

[66]  C. Hancock.  The long and winding road , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[67]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[68]  Karla Hemming,et al.  Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[69]  Enrico Coiera,et al.  Health Information Management: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in Health Care Work , 2003 .

[70]  M. Pringle,et al.  Evaluating eHealth: How to Make Evaluation More Methodologically Robust , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[71]  Barbara Czarniawska.  A Theory of Organizing , 2008 .

[72]  M. Berg,et al.  ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[73]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[74]  D. Blumenthal.  Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. , 2009, The West Virginia medical journal.

[75]  E. Coiera.  Four rules for the reinvention of health care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[76]  Kim M. Unertl,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Crossing the Implementation Chasm: A Proposal for Bold Action , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[77]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[78]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[79]  Mona Choi,et al.  Handbook of Evaluation Methods for Health Informatics , 2011, Healthcare Informatics Research.

[80]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Evaluating eHealth Interventions: The Need for Continuous Systemic Evaluation , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[81]  J. Greene,et al.  Strategies for Qualitative Data Analysis , 1987 .

[82]  M. Weber.  Methodology of Social Sciences , 1949 .

[83]  Marc Berg,et al.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[84]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..