Research Article Systematic Creativity Tools for Product Concept Generation: Evaluation of Learning Experiences in Engineering Design Education

This study considers the use of systematic creativity tools for concept generation belonging to C-K theory and TRIZ, in addition to traditional ones used for product development. The aim of this study is twofold. On one hand, it aims to contribute to the improvement of the creative and innovation skills of engineering students and designers in general by the introduction of specific creativity enhancement tools. On the other hand, it proposes a method for evaluating the training and learning outcomes of the students involved in the courses based on Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Evaluation and used a questionnaire to collect students' answers and opinions. This way, some practical cases are carried on and two of these are presented in detail: one concerning the ideation of a new kind of gym towel and one concerning the analysis of a knee implant for total knee replacement surgery for possible improvements. The questionnaire results show that students considered the training and learning experiences and the use of the two new methods in a positive way. In particular, TRIZ method represents the most appreciated at all, while C-K theory is revealed as the newest one and very promising for the students' future professional development.

[1]  Denis Choulier,et al.  A COHERENT AND DISCRIMINATING SKILLS STANDARD FOR INNOVATIVE DESIGN , 2011 .

[2]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[3]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products , 2009 .

[4]  Asko Riitahuhta,et al.  Developing Engineering Creativity in the Early Design Stages of Product Development Process , 2010 .

[5]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Strategic Management of Innovation and Design , 2010 .

[6]  Iouri Belski,et al.  Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving at University: A Course on TRIZ , 2009 .

[7]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[8]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  How Combinations of TRIZ Tools are Used in Companies - Results of a Cluster Analysis , 2005 .

[9]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[10]  Ian de Vere.  Developing creative engineers: a design approach to engineering education , 2009 .

[11]  H Nägerl,et al.  A novel total knee replacement by rolling articulating surfaces. In vivo functional measurements and tests. , 2008, Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics.

[12]  Vicente Chulvi,et al.  Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions , 2013 .

[13]  Taha Chettibi,et al.  Design of high-flexion total knee prosthesis considering activities of North African peoples , 2011 .

[14]  B Roussel,et al.  METHOD OF CREATIVITY INCLUDING AN IDEAS EVALUATION TOOL: APPLICATION IN AN INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP , 2012 .

[15]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Systematic Approaches for Inventive Thinking and Problem-Solving: Implications for Engineering Education* , 2004 .

[16]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[17]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design , 2014 .

[18]  Ludmila Praslova,et al.  Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education , 2010 .

[19]  Yeh-Liang Hsu,et al.  Design of a Novel Total Knee Prosthesis Using TRIZ , 2006 .

[20]  Le Masson Pascal,et al.  Creativity and Design Reasoning: How C-K Theory Can Enhance Creative Design , 2007 .

[21]  T. Goswami,et al.  Knee implants – Review of models and biomechanics , 2009 .

[22]  Angela Shartrand,et al.  Answering the Call for Innovation: Three Faculty Development Models to Enhance Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Engineering , 2012 .

[23]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 1996 .

[24]  Ellen Domb,et al.  Simplified TRIZ: New Problem-Solving Applications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals , 2002 .

[25]  Toru Nakagawa.  Education and training of creative problem solving thinking with TRIZ/USIT , 2011 .

[26]  Robert Phaal,et al.  A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice , 2013 .

[27]  Motyl Barbara,et al.  Comparison of Creativity Enhancement and Idea Generation Methods in Engineering Design Training , 2014 .

[28]  Jack Hipple,et al.  The Integration of TRIZ with Other Ideation Tools and Processes as Well as with Psychological Assessment Tools , 2005 .

[29]  W. Zeiler.  Thinking outside the box: Integral Design and C-K concept creation , 2010 .

[30]  Guoliang Zhang,et al.  Improved design of sagittal femoral condylar geometry using TRIZ , 2009 .

[31]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2012 .

[32]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods , 2012 .

[33]  Marine Agogué,et al.  A new methodology for advanced engineering design: Lessons from experimenting C-K Theory driven tools , 2012 .

[34]  P. Marques,et al.  Creativity and Innovation through Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral Cooperation , 2007 .

[35]  Stefano Filippi,et al.  Integration of Creativity Enhancement Tools in Medical Device Design Process , 2014 .

[36]  Stefano Filippi,et al.  Classifying TRIZ methods to speed up their adoption and the ROI for SMEs , 2011 .

[37]  Marine Agogué,et al.  10 Years of C–K Theory: A Survey on the Academic and Industrial Impacts of a Design Theory , 2014 .

[38]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  Stimulating Creativity: A More Practical Alternative to TRIZ , 2009 .

[39]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K THEORY IN PRACTICE : LESSONS FROM INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS , 2004 .

[40]  Karen Gadd,et al.  TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving , 2011 .