A Hybrid Model Based on Constraint OSELM, Adaptive Weighted SRC and KNN for Large-Scale Indoor Localization

In this paper, a novel hybrid model based on the constraint online sequential extreme learning machine (COSELM) classifier with adaptive weighted sparse representation classification (WSRC) and k nearest neighbor (KNN) is proposed for the WiFi-based indoor positioning system. It is referred to as A Fast-Accurate-Reliable Localization System (AFARLS). AFARLS exploits the speed advantage of COSELM to reduce the computational cost, and the accuracy advantage of WSRC to enhance the classification performance, by utilizing KNN as the adaptive sub-dictionary selection strategy. The understanding is that the original extreme learning machine (ELM) is less robust against noise, while sparse representation classification (SRC) and KNN suffer a high computational burden when using the over-complete dictionary. AFARLS unifies their complementary strengths to resolve each other’s limitation. In large-scale multi-building and multi-floor environments, AFARLS estimates a location that considers the building, floor, and position (longitude and latitude) in a hierarchical and sequential approach according to a discriminative criterion to the COSELM output. If the classifier result is unreliable, AFARLS uses KNN to achieve the best relevant sub-dictionary. The sub-dictionary is fed to WSRC to re-estimate the building and the floor, while the position is predicted by the ELM regressor. AFARLS has been verified on two publicly available datasets, the EU Zenodo and the UJIIndoorLoc. The experimental results demonstrate that AFARLS outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms on the former dataset, and it provides near state-of-the-art performance on the latter dataset. When the size of the dataset increases remarkably, AFARLS shows that it can maintain its real-time high-accuracy performance.

[1]  Yiqiang Chen,et al.  Constraint Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine for lifelong indoor localization system , 2014, 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[2]  Yiqiang Chen,et al.  SELM: Semi-supervised ELM with application in sparse calibrated location estimation , 2011, Neurocomputing.

[3]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Extreme learning machine and adaptive sparse representation for image classification , 2016, Neural Networks.

[4]  Shih-Hau Fang,et al.  A novel clustering-based approach of indoor location fingerprinting , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[5]  Ramón F. Brena,et al.  Evolution of Indoor Positioning Technologies: A Survey , 2017, J. Sensors.

[6]  Polly Huang,et al.  Sensor-assisted wi-fi indoor location system for adapting to environmental dynamics , 2005, MSWiM '05.

[7]  Marcin Grzegorzek,et al.  On Wi-Fi Model Optimizations for Smartphone-Based Indoor Localization , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[8]  Abhishek Javali,et al.  IoT based localization and tracking , 2017, 2017 International Conference on IoT and Application (ICIOT).

[9]  Chee Kheong Siew,et al.  Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[10]  Guang-Bin Huang,et al.  Trends in extreme learning machines: A review , 2015, Neural Networks.

[11]  Manuele Bicego,et al.  Weighted K-Nearest Neighbor revisited , 2016, 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR).

[12]  Hao Jiang,et al.  A Fast and Precise Indoor Localization Algorithm Based on an Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine † , 2015, Sensors.

[13]  Lisha Hu,et al.  FSELM: fusion semi-supervised extreme learning machine for indoor localization with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth fingerprints , 2018, Soft Comput..

[14]  Elena Simona Lohan,et al.  Wi-Fi Crowdsourced Fingerprinting Dataset for Indoor Positioning , 2017, Data.

[15]  Narasimhan Sundararajan,et al.  A Fast and Accurate Online Sequential Learning Algorithm for Feedforward Networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[16]  Lei Shu,et al.  Path-Loss-Based Fingerprint Localization Approach for Location-Based Services in Indoor Environments , 2017, IEEE Access.

[17]  Prashant Krishnamurthy,et al.  Properties of indoor received signal strength for WLAN location fingerprinting , 2004, The First Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2004. MOBIQUITOUS 2004..

[18]  Regina Kaune,et al.  Accuracy studies for TDOA and TOA localization , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[19]  Hongming Zhou,et al.  Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[20]  Xiaohong Shen,et al.  TDOA-Based Source Collaborative Localization via Semidefinite Relaxation in Sensor Networks , 2015, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[21]  Adolfo Martínez Usó,et al.  UJIIndoorLoc: A new multi-building and multi-floor database for WLAN fingerprint-based indoor localization problems , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[22]  G. Retscher,et al.  FUSION OF LOCATION FINGERPRINTING AND TRILATERATION BASED ON THEEXAMPLE OF DIFFERENTIAL WI-FI POSITIONING , 2017 .

[23]  Herbert Peremans,et al.  A realistic evaluation of indoor positioning systems based on Wi-Fi fingerprinting: The 2015 EvAAL-ETRI competition , 2017, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[24]  Tacha Serif,et al.  Improving RSS-Based Indoor Positioning Algorithm via K-Means Clustering , 2011, EW.

[25]  Heikki Huttunen,et al.  Clustering benefits in mobile-centric WiFi positioning in multi-floor buildings , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

[26]  Maria João Nicolau,et al.  Wi-Fi fingerprinting in the real world - RTLS@UM at the EvAAL competition , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[27]  Rehan Qureshi,et al.  RSSI based Node Localization using Trilateration in Wireless Sensor Network , 2015 .

[28]  Raúl Montoliu,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of distance and similarity measures for Wi-Fi fingerprinting indoor positioning systems , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Mikko Valkama,et al.  K-Means Fingerprint Clustering for Low-Complexity Floor Estimation in Indoor Mobile Localization , 2015, 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[30]  Sanghyuk Lee,et al.  A scalable deep neural network architecture for multi-building and multi-floor indoor localization based on Wi-Fi fingerprinting , 2017, ArXiv.

[31]  Scott,et al.  Global Positioning Systems in Combat , 2007 .

[32]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Improvement and Comparison of Weighted k Nearest Neighbors Classifiers for Model Selection , 2016 .

[33]  Yi Liu,et al.  Indoor Fingerprint Positioning Based on Wi-Fi: An Overview , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[34]  Robin Henniges Current approches of Wifi Positioning , 2012 .

[35]  Hao Chen,et al.  ConFi: Convolutional Neural Networks Based Indoor Wi-Fi Localization Using Channel State Information , 2017, IEEE Access.

[36]  Mario Siller,et al.  A fingerprinting indoor localization algorithm based deep learning , 2016, 2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN).

[37]  Elena Simona Lohan,et al.  Deconvolution-based indoor localization with WLAN signals and unknown access point locations , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

[38]  Mark van Heeswijk,et al.  Binary/ternary extreme learning machines , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[39]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.