A Re-Examination of the Mere Exposure Effect: The Influence of Repeated Exposure on Recognition, Familiarity, and Liking

To evaluate the veracity of models of the mere exposure effect and to understand the processes that moderate the effect, we conducted a meta-analysis of the influence of repeated exposure on liking, familiarity, recognition, among other evaluations. We estimated parameters from 268 curve estimates drawn from 81 articles and revealed that the mere exposure effect was characterized by a positive slope and negative quadratic effect consistent with an inverted-U shaped curve. In fact, such curves were associated with (a) all visual, but not auditory stimuli; (b) exposure durations shorter than 10 s and longer than 1 min; (c) both homogeneous and heterogeneous presentation types; and (d) ratings that were taken after all stimuli were presented. We conclude that existing models for the mere exposure effect do not adequately account for the findings, and we provide a framework to help guide future research.

[1]  Rebecca R. Johnston The effect of repetition on preference ratings for select unfamiliar musical examples: Does preference transfer? , 2016 .

[2]  Jochim Hansen,et al.  Relative Processing Fluency , 2015 .

[3]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  The effect of repetition in Internet banner ads and the moderating role of animation , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Jan R. Landwehr,et al.  A Dual-Process Perspective on Fluency-Based Aesthetics , 2015, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[5]  D. Westerman,et al.  The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Xiaofei Xie,et al.  Inverted U-shaped model: How frequent repetition affects perceived risk , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[7]  R. Wong The Mere Exposure Effect and Classical Conditioning , 2015 .

[8]  D. Berlyne Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[9]  Benjamin C. Storm,et al.  Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: a meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  M. Messner,et al.  Less is sometimes more: How repetition of an antismoking advertisement affects attitudes toward smoking and source credibility , 2014 .

[11]  R. Horton,et al.  A Two-Dimensional Model for the Study of Interpersonal Attraction , 2014, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  B. Newell,et al.  Exposure Is Not Enough: Suppressing Stimuli from Awareness Can Abolish the Mere Exposure Effect , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  P. Hekkert,et al.  The mere exposure effect for consumer products as a consequence of existing familiarity and controlled exposure. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[15]  Angela M. Pazzaglia,et al.  A critical comparison of discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: implications for recognition and beyond. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Chi-Shing Tse,et al.  Citation rates for experimental psychology articles published between 1950 and 2004: Top-cited articles in behavioral cognitive psychology , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Sascha Topolinski The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  Listen, Learn, Like! Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Involved in the Mere Exposure Effect in Music , 2012, Neurology research international.

[19]  J. Förster,et al.  Mere exposure revisited: the influence of growth versus security cues on evaluations of novel and familiar stimuli. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  John T Wixted,et al.  Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Jonathan J. Rolison,et al.  The role of formal structure in liking for popular music , 2012 .

[22]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Effects of Exposure on Discrimination of Similar Stimuli and on Memory for Their Unique and Common Features , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Christian Schemer,et al.  I See What You Don't See , 2011 .

[24]  Lincoln G. Craton,et al.  Attitude toward the advertising music: an overlooked potential pitfall in commercials , 2011 .

[25]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Variations in recollection: the effects of complexity on source recognition. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Agreement and Information in the Reliability of Coding , 2011 .

[27]  E. Glenn Schellenberg,et al.  Interactive effects of personality and frequency of exposure on liking for music , 2011 .

[28]  R. Moreland,et al.  The Mere Exposure Phenomenon: A Lingering Melody by Robert Zajonc , 2010 .

[29]  J. Wixted,et al.  A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.

[30]  M. Leary Affiliation, Acceptance, and Belonging: The Pursuit of Interpersonal Connection , 2010 .

[31]  D. Huber,et al.  Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  F. Strack,et al.  False fame prevented: avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[34]  David E. Huber,et al.  Automatic Affective Dynamics: An Activation-Habituation Model of Affective Assimilation and Contrast , 2010, Modeling Machine Emotions for Realizing Intelligence.

[35]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Uniting the Tribes of Fluency to Form a Metacognitive Nation , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[36]  M. Wänke,et al.  Liking What's FamiLiar: the importance oF UnconscioUs FamiLiarity in the mere-exposUre eFFect , 2009 .

[37]  F. Strack,et al.  Motormouth: mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Jens Förster,et al.  Cognitive consequences of novelty and familiarity: How mere exposure influences level of construal , 2009 .

[39]  Therese D. Pigott,et al.  Handling missing data. , 2009 .

[40]  T. Curran,et al.  Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Mere Exposure and Racial Prejudice: Exposure to Other-Race Faces Increases Liking for Strangers of That Race. , 2008, Social cognition.

[42]  P. Twomey,et al.  How to use linear regression and correlation in quantitative method comparison studies , 2008, International journal of clinical practice.

[43]  I. Peretz,et al.  Liking for happy- and sad-sounding music: Effects of exposure , 2008 .

[44]  Erin A. Egan Neuroimaging as Evidence , 2007, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[45]  E. Tapia,et al.  Investigating the dynamics of affect: Psychological mechanisms of affective habituation to pleasurable stimuli , 2007 .

[46]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[48]  A. Bruce,et al.  Reactions to Heard Words: Varying Emotional Content and Frequency of Exposure , 2007, The Journal of general psychology.

[49]  F. Windels,et al.  Neuronal activity , 2006, Molecular Neurobiology.

[50]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[51]  David B Mitchell,et al.  Nonconscious Priming After 17 Years , 2006, Psychological science.

[52]  P. Winkielman,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Prototypes Are Attractive Because They Are Easy on the Mind , 2022 .

[53]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[54]  Matthew P. Spackman,et al.  The Effects of Repeated Exposure on Liking and Judgments of Musical Unity of Intact and Patchwork Compositions , 2006 .

[55]  A. Nowak,et al.  A neural model of mere exposure: The EXAC mechanism 1, 2 , 2006 .

[56]  J. Raymond,et al.  Semantic association of brand images at the implicit level: evidence from repetition blindness , 2005 .

[57]  Katrin R. Harich,et al.  Creating brand identity: a study of evaluation of new brand names , 2005 .

[58]  J. Lisman,et al.  The Hippocampal-VTA Loop: Controlling the Entry of Information into Long-Term Memory , 2005, Neuron.

[59]  Sridhar Moorthy,et al.  Advertising repetition and quality perception , 2005 .

[60]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[61]  M. D Rugg,et al.  The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming , 2004, NeuroImage.

[62]  D. Schacter,et al.  Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning , 2004, Nature.

[63]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Liking and memory for musical stimuli as a function of exposure. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  J. Ringo,et al.  Investigation of long term recognition and association memory in unit responses from inferotemporal cortex , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[65]  E. Tulving [Episodic memory: from mind to brain]. , 2004, Revue neurologique.

[66]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Neuronal activity related to visual recognition memory: long-term memory and the encoding of recency and familiarity information in the primate anterior and medial inferior temporal and rhinal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  R. Henson,et al.  Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects , 2003 .

[69]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart) , 2003 .

[70]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment , 2003 .

[71]  Christie L. Nordhielm The Influence of Level of Processing on Advertising Repetition Effects , 2002 .

[72]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  5. Affect and processing dynamics , 2002 .

[73]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[74]  R. Compton,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Affective Response: Effects of Mere Exposure , 2002 .

[75]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[76]  Angela Y. Lee The Mere Exposure Effect: An Uncertainty Reduction Explanation Revisited , 2001 .

[77]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  The Feeling of Familiarity as a Regulator of Persuasive Processing , 2001 .

[78]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[79]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Low-Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief , 2001 .

[80]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[81]  S Duval,et al.  Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis , 2000, Biometrics.

[82]  William R. Roche,et al.  Clinical Investigation and Statistics in Laboratory Medicine. , 2000 .

[83]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[84]  T. Shallice,et al.  Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. , 2000, Science.

[85]  D. Mackie,et al.  The positive feeling of familiarity: Mood as an information processing regulation mechanism. , 2000 .

[86]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. , 1999 .

[87]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[88]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  L. Cermak,et al.  Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[90]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[91]  Omer Van den Bergh,et al.  Repetition and Boredom in a Perceptual Fluency/ Attributional Model of Affective Judgements , 1998 .

[92]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Differential neuronal encoding of novelty, familiarity and recency in regions of the anterior temporal lobe , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[93]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[94]  E. Maylor Retrieving names in old age: Short- and (very) long-term effects of repetition , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[95]  H. Reis,et al.  Attraction and close relationships. , 1998 .

[96]  Eliot R. Smith Mental representation and memory. , 1998 .

[97]  L. F. Abbott,et al.  Functional signatificance of synaptic depression between cortical neurons , 1997 .

[98]  W. Fred van Raaij,et al.  What inhibits the mere-exposure effect: Recollection or familiarity? , 1997 .

[99]  A. Yonelinas Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[100]  Amna Kirmani Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong , 1997 .

[101]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[102]  R. Desimone,et al.  Object and place memory in the macaque entorhinal cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[103]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Recognition Memory and Modality Judgments: A Comparison of Retrieval Dynamics , 1997 .

[104]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic Depression and Cortical Gain Control , 1997, Science.

[105]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[107]  J. Ringo,et al.  Mnemonic Responses of Single Units Recorded from Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex, Accessed via Transcommissural Versus Direct Pathways: A Dissociation between Unit Activity and Behavior , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[108]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivational effects in the mere-exposure paradigm , 1996 .

[109]  J. Ringo Stimulus specific adaptation in inferior temporal and medial temporal cortex of the monkey , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[110]  Kevin N. Ochsner,et al.  Varieties of priming , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[111]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[112]  E. Miller,et al.  Neocortical memory traces , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[113]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[114]  R. Bornstein,et al.  The Attribution and Discounting of Perceptual Fluency: Preliminary Tests of a Perceptual Fluency/Attributional Model of the Mere Exposure Effect , 1994 .

[115]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  Exposure effects and affective responses to music , 1994 .

[116]  J. Ringo,et al.  Stimulus specific adaptation in excited but not in inhibited cells in inferotemporal cortex of Macaque , 1994, Brain Research.

[117]  R. Desimone,et al.  Parallel neuronal mechanisms for short-term memory. , 1994, Science.

[118]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[119]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[120]  C. Wiggs Aging and memory for frequency of occurrence of novel, visual stimuli : direct and indirect measures , 1993 .

[121]  Doug Jones,et al.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations , 1993, Human nature.

[122]  R. Desimone,et al.  The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[123]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[124]  R. Desimone,et al.  Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short- term memory task , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[125]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  The Effects of Length, Content, and Repetition on Television Commercial Effectiveness , 1993 .

[126]  D. S. Lindsay,et al.  Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge Questions , 1993 .

[127]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Concurrent processes: The affect-cognition relationship within the context of the “mere exposure” phenomenon , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[128]  Ian Begg,et al.  Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth , 1992 .

[129]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[130]  Scott R. Beach,et al.  Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students , 1992 .

[131]  L. Squire Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. , 1992, Psychological review.

[132]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Lectures for a layperson: Methods for revealing unconscious processes. , 1992 .

[133]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[134]  P. Sleight,et al.  Publication bias , 1991, The Lancet.

[135]  I. Riches,et al.  The effects of visual stimulation and memory on neurons of the hippocampal formation and the neighboring parahippocampal gyrus and inferior temporal cortex of the primate , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[136]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Illusions of immediate memory: evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality , 1990 .

[137]  David W. Schumann,et al.  Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation Hypotheses , 1990 .

[138]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Ease of message processing as a moderator of repetition effects in advertising. , 1990 .

[139]  R. Bornstein,et al.  Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect , 1990 .

[140]  G. Logan Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[141]  N. Schwarz Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. , 1990 .

[142]  C. Carver,et al.  Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View. , 1990 .

[143]  Ida E. Berger,et al.  The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship , 1989 .

[144]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[145]  M. Watkins,et al.  Recognition memory and the mere exposure effect. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[146]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[147]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Memory influences subjective experience: Noise judgments. , 1988 .

[148]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Classical Conditioning of Consumer Attitudes: Four Experiments in an Advertising Context , 1987 .

[149]  J. Kihlstrom The cognitive unconscious. , 1987, Science.

[150]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  Unconscious Influences of Memory for a Prior Event , 1987 .

[151]  Stephen Meredith Williams Repeated exposure and the attractiveness of synthetic speech: An inverted-U relationship , 1987 .

[152]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction to psychology, 9th ed. , 1987 .

[153]  P. Merikle,et al.  Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[154]  D. Stern,et al.  Affective reactions to stimuli and infants' preferences for novelty and familiarity. , 1986, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry.

[155]  Arno J. Rethans,et al.  Effects of television commercial repetition, receiver knowledge, and commercial length: A test of the two-factor model. , 1986 .

[156]  G. Bonanno,et al.  Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. , 1986, The American journal of psychology.

[157]  A. B. Hill,et al.  Towards a model of boredom. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[158]  D. Hargreaves The Effects of Repetition on Liking for Music , 1984 .

[159]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research , 1984 .

[160]  Colin Martindale,et al.  The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. , 1984 .

[161]  Michael A. Belch,et al.  An Investigation of the Effects of Repetition on Cognitive and Affective Reactions T0 Humorous and Serious Television Commercials , 1984 .

[162]  Michael A. Hunter,et al.  Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarization time on infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. , 1983 .

[163]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[164]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[165]  N. Brody,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test , 1983 .

[166]  Richard L. Moreland,et al.  Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction , 1982 .

[167]  J. O'hanlon,et al.  Boredom: practical consequences and a theory. , 1981, Acta psychologica.

[168]  L. Jacoby,et al.  On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[169]  Leah L. Light,et al.  Why Attractive People are Harder to Remember , 1981 .

[170]  R. Zajonc Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[171]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. , 1980, Science.

[172]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[173]  W. Wilson,et al.  Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. , 1979 .

[174]  Frederick T. Bacon Credibility of Repeated Statements: Memory for Trivia. , 1979 .

[175]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[176]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. , 1979 .

[177]  R. Moreland,et al.  Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects , 1977 .

[178]  Guessing versus judging after mere repeated exposure. , 1977 .

[179]  J. Brockner,et al.  Effects of repeated exposure and attitudinal similarity on self-disclosure and interpersonal attraction. , 1976 .

[180]  Donald D. Dorfman,et al.  The effect of stimulus uncertainty on the relationship between frequency of exposure and liking. , 1975 .

[181]  Ronald G. Heyduk Rated preference for musical compositions as it relates to complexity and exposure frequency , 1975 .

[182]  David J. Stang,et al.  Methodological factors in mere exposure research. , 1974 .

[183]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Children's Reactions to Television Advertising: An Experimental Approach , 1974 .

[184]  M. W. Matlin Frequency-Affect Relationship in a Simultaneous Spatial Presentation , 1974 .

[185]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[186]  T. Ostrom,et al.  Repetition of highly similar messages and attitude change. , 1974 .

[187]  A. Heingartner,et al.  Affective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[188]  Walter Swap,et al.  Effect of Extreme Exposure Frequencies on Different Affective Ratings of Stimuli , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[189]  David J. Stang,et al.  The computer as experimenter in social psychological research , 1974 .

[190]  D. Bartlett Effect of Repeated Listenings on Structural Discrimination and Affective Response , 1973 .

[191]  R. Kail,et al.  Sequence redundancy, rating dimensions, and the exposure effect , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[192]  P N Hamid Exposure frequency and stimulus preference. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[193]  D. W. Rajecki,et al.  THE RATING OF MATERIALS FOUND IN THE MAILBOX: EFFECTS OF FREQUENCY OF RECEIPT , 1973 .

[194]  R. Crandall Field Extension of the Frequency-Affect Findings , 1972, Psychological reports.

[195]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Exposure, satiation, and stimulus discriminability. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[196]  A. Harrison,et al.  Heterogeneity-homogeneity of exposure sequence and the attitudinal effects of exposure. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[197]  Albert A. Harrison,et al.  Drive and predisposition as factors in the attitudinal effects of mere exposure , 1972 .

[198]  R. K. Tucker,et al.  Persuasion via mere exposure. , 1971 .

[199]  S. Oskamp,et al.  The effects of picture content and exposure frequency on evaluations of Negroes and whites. , 1971 .

[200]  M W Matlin,et al.  Response competition, recognition, and affect. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[201]  Albert A. Harrison,et al.  Limiting Conditions of the Exposure Effect: Satiation and Relativity. , 1971 .

[202]  P. Suedfeld,et al.  Effects of set on the "effects of mere exposure." , 1971 .

[203]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory , 1971 .

[204]  S. Saegert,et al.  Effects of initial level of response competition and frequency of exposure on liking and exploratory behavior. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[205]  Preference and expectancy arousal: further evidence. , 1970, The Journal of general psychology.

[206]  D. Berlyne Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[207]  Albert A. Harrison,et al.  The Effects of Frequency and Duration of Exposure on Response Competition and Affective Ratings , 1970 .

[208]  A. Harrison,et al.  Response competition, frequency, exploratory behavior, and liking. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[209]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[210]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[211]  D. Berlyne Curiosity and exploration. , 1966, Science.

[212]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.