Att implementera rehabiliterings- samverkan: en fallstudie

Samordningsforbund ar en struktur for interorganisatorisk samverkan inom rehabiliteringsomradet mellan kommun, landsting, Forsakringskassan och Ar-betsformedlingen. I denna fallstudie har implementeringsprocesser kring sam-verkansteam i tva samordningsforbund studerats, med fokus pa utveckling av strategier for implementering, hur berorda organisationer involverades i denna process, samt hur strategierna paverkade hallbarheten i samverkansarbetet. Studien omfattar individuella intervjuer, fokusgrupper och dokumentstudier. Studien visar tva olika strategier for implementering med olika utfall. Medan forbund ett forsokte (men misslyckades) att implementera specifika samver-kansprojekt hade forbund tva en bredare interaktiv strategi for att astadkomma en lokal samverkansstruktur. Denna strategi innebar att ett centralt samver-kansteam kunde startas och drivas vidare, med stod fran samtliga parter. Coordination Associations is a structure for cooperation between public actors in the rehabilitation field. In this case study, the implementation processes of two cooperation teams are studied, focusing on strategies for implementation, and how these strategies affected the sustainability of the cooperation. The study illustrate two different strategies with different results; one that tried (but failed) to implement cooperative projects, and one interactive strategy aiming to create a local cooperation structure. The latter strategy resulted in a more successful implementation of the team.

[1]  Rachelle Buchbinder,et al.  Prevention of Work Disability Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders: The Challenge of Implementing Evidence , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[2]  C. Lundborg,et al.  Barriers of inter-organisational integration in vocational rehabilitation , 2008, International journal of integrated care.

[3]  Barbara Czarniawska Narratives in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[4]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations (5. ed.) , 2003 .

[5]  R. Axelsson,et al.  Inter-organisational integration for rehabilitation in Sweden – variation in views on long-term goals , 2004, International journal of integrated care.

[6]  P. Ellström,et al.  Practice‐based innovation: a learning perspective , 2010 .

[7]  J. Ekholm,et al.  Effects on work resumption of a co-operation project in vocational rehabilitation. Systematic, multi-professional, client-centred and solution-oriented co-operation , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  Raymond Baril,et al.  Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: Optimizing the Role of Stakeholders in Implementation and Research , 2005, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[10]  U. Bültmann,et al.  Coordinated and Tailored Work Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Economic Evaluation Undertaken with Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders , 2009, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[11]  From Cooperation to Conflict? Swedish Rehabilitation Professionals’ Experiences of Interorganizational Cooperation , 2011, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[12]  K. Ekberg,et al.  A Matter of Trust? A Study of Coordination of Swedish Stakeholders in Return-to-Work , 2010, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[13]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  S. J. Vermeulen,et al.  A Participatory Return-to-Work Intervention for Temporary Agency Workers and Unemployed Workers Sick-Listed Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.