Data Fusion of Different Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Images Applied to Forest-Type Mapping

A data fusion method for land cover (LC) classification is proposed that combines remote sensing data at a fine and a coarse spatial resolution. It is a two-step approach, based on the assumption that some of the LC classes can be merged into a more generalized LC class. Step one creates a generalized LC map, using only the information available at the fine spatial resolution. In the second step, a new classifier refines the generalized LC classes to create distinct subclasses of its parent class, using the generalized LC map as a mask. This classifier uses all image information (bands) available at both fine and coarse spatial resolutions. We followed a simple data fusion technique by stacking the individual image bands into a multidimensional vector. The advantage of the proposed approach is that the spatial detail of the generalized LC classes is retained in the final LC map. The method has been designed for operational LC mapping over large areas. Within this paper, it is shown that the proposed data fusion approach increased the robustness of forest-type mapping within Europe. Robustness is particularly important when creating continental LC maps at fine spatial resolution. These maps become more popular now that remote sensing data at fine resolution are easier to access.

[1]  O. Hagner,et al.  A method for calibrated maximum likelihood classification of forest types , 2007 .

[2]  Janet Franklin,et al.  Mapping land-cover modifications over large areas: A comparison of machine learning algorithms , 2008 .

[3]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Estimation of tropical forest area from coarse spatial resolution data: A two-step correction function for proportional errors due to spatial aggregation , 1995 .

[4]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A review and analysis of backpropagation neural networks for classification of remotely-sensed multi-spectral imagery , 1995 .

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[6]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Neural Network Approaches Versus Statistical Methods in Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[7]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  Landsat-7 Long-Term Acquisition Plan: Development and Validation , 2006 .

[8]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results , 2002 .

[9]  Shigeo Abe DrEng.  Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[10]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[11]  James L. McClelland.  Explorations In Parallel Distributed Processing , 1988 .

[12]  J. Gao,et al.  A comparative study on spatial and spectral resolutions of satellite data in mapping mangrove forests , 1999 .

[13]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[14]  E. Tomppo.  National Forest Inventories : pathways for common reporting , 2010 .

[15]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  30 years of adaptive neural networks: perceptron, Madaline, and backpropagation , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[17]  G. Kane.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[18]  William J. Emery,et al.  Comparing Statistical and Neural Network Methods Applied to Very High Resolution Satellite Images Showing Changes in Man-Made Structures at Rocky Flats , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  M. Bossard,et al.  CORINE land cover technical guide - Addendum 2000 , 2000 .

[20]  Jocelyn Chanussot,et al.  Decision Fusion for the Classification of Hyperspectral Data: Outcome of the 2008 GRS-S Data Fusion Contest , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[22]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[23]  J. Fry,et al.  Updating the 2001 National Land Cover Database land cover classification to 2006 by using Landsat imagery change detection methods , 2009 .

[24]  Gyanesh Chander,et al.  SSTL UK-DMC SLIM-6 Data Quality Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Appendix G: Thirty Years of Adaptive Neural Networks: Perceptron, Madaline, and Backpropagation , 2008 .

[26]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[27]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global land cover classi(cid:142) cation at 1 km spatial resolution using a classi(cid:142) cation tree approach , 2004 .

[28]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Estimation of tree cover using MODIS data at global, continental and regional/local scales , 2005 .

[29]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[30]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): land remote sensing for global change research , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[31]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[32]  Yoav Freund,et al.  Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority , 1995, COLT '90.

[33]  P. Strobl,et al.  Pan-European Forest/Non-Forest Mapping with Landsat ETM+ and CORINE Land Cover 2000 Data , 2009 .

[34]  J. Townshend,et al.  NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale , 1994 .

[35]  J. Cihlar.  Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: Status and research priorities , 2000 .