Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?

BackgroundTumor spatial heterogeneity is an important prognostic factor, which may be reflected in medical imagesMethodsImage texture analysis is an approach of quantifying heterogeneity that may not be appreciated by the naked eye. Different methods can be applied including statistical-, model-, and transform-based methods.ResultsEarly evidence suggests that texture analysis has the potential to augment diagnosis and characterization as well as improve tumor staging and therapy response assessment in oncological practice.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of the application of texture analysis with different imaging modalities, CT, MRI, and PET, to date and describes the technical challenges that have limited its widespread clinical implementation so far. With further efforts to refine its application, image texture analysis has the potential to develop into a valuable clinical tool for oncologic imaging.Teaching Points• Tumor spatial heterogeneity is an important prognostic factor.• Image texture analysis is an approach of quantifying heterogeneity.• Different methods can be applied, including statistical-, model-, and transform-based methods.• Texture analysis could improve the diagnosis, tumor staging, and therapy response assessment.

[1]  W J Niessen,et al.  Heterogeneity in DCE-MRI parametric maps: a biomarker for treatment response? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  F. Cendes,et al.  Texture analysis of medical images. , 2004, Clinical radiology.

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Texture Analysis , 2018, Handbook of Image Processing and Computer Vision.

[4]  Brandon Whitcher,et al.  DCE-MRI biomarkers of tumour heterogeneity predict CRC liver metastasis shrinkage following bevacizumab and FOLFOX-6 , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  H. Fujita,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis: preliminary evaluation of MRI texture analysis using the finite difference method and an artificial neural network. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  G. Collewet,et al.  Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  L. Costaridou,et al.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Omar Sultan Al-Kadi,et al.  Assessment of texture measures susceptibility to noise in conventional and contrast enhanced computed tomography lung tumour images , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  V. Goh,et al.  Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancer: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. , 2011, Radiology.

[11]  H. Eskola,et al.  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma response evaluation with MRI texture classification , 2009, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[12]  Arivazhagan Selvaraj,et al.  Texture segmentation using wavelet transform , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  W. B. Marks,et al.  Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology — dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Texture‐based classification of focal liver lesions on MRI at 3.0 Tesla: A feasibility study in cysts and hemangiomas , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Wu-Chung Shen,et al.  Diagnosis of hepatic tumors with texture analysis in nonenhanced computed tomography images. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[16]  P Vaupel,et al.  Intratumoral pO2 predicts survival in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  S. Das,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and fractal characteristics of percolation clusters in two-dimensional tumor blood perfusion. , 1999, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.

[18]  Hongmin Cai,et al.  Quantitative analysis and prediction of regional lymph node status in rectal cancer based on computed tomography imaging , 2011, European Radiology.

[19]  C. Chatwin,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Texture Analysis of the Liver: Initial Assessment in Colorectal Cancer , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[20]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in oesophageal cancer assessed by CT texture analysis: preliminary evidence of an association with tumour metabolism, stage, and survival. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[21]  Shoji Kido,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Internal and Peripheral Textures of Small Peripheral Bronchogenic Carcinomas in Thin-section Computed Tomography: Comparison of Bronchioloalveolar Cell Carcinomas With Nonbronchioloalveolar Cell Carcinomas , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision , 1993 .

[23]  Richard Frayne,et al.  A comparison of texture quantification techniques based on the Fourier and S transforms. , 2008, Medical physics.

[24]  Lucia Dettori,et al.  A comparison of wavelet, ridgelet, and curvelet-based texture classification algorithms in computed tomography , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[25]  C. Chatwin,et al.  Hepatic entropy and uniformity: additional parameters that can potentially increase the effectiveness of contrast enhancement during abdominal CT. , 2007, Clinical radiology.

[26]  Shoji Kido,et al.  Fractal Analysis of Small Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules in Thin-section CT: Evaluation of the Lung-nodule Interfaces , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[27]  H. Eskola,et al.  Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[28]  Ajai Jain,et al.  The Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision , 1993 .

[29]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[30]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  Andrzej Materka,et al.  Effects of MRI acquisition parameter variations and protocol heterogeneity on the results of texture analysis and pattern discrimination: an application-oriented study. , 2009, Medical physics.

[32]  Laura H. Tang,et al.  Effect of Tumor Heterogeneity on the Assessment of Ki67 Labeling Index in Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors Metastatic to the Liver: Implications for Prognostic Stratification , 2011, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[33]  Omar S. Al-Kadi,et al.  Texture Analysis of Aggressive and Nonaggressive Lung Tumor CE CT Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  B. Clymer,et al.  Texture detection of simulated microcalcification susceptibility effects in magnetic resonance imaging of breasts , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  G. Tourassi Journey toward computer-aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis. , 1999, Radiology.

[37]  Luc Bidaut,et al.  The influence of field strength and different clinical breast MRI protocols on the outcome of texture analysis using foam phantoms. , 2011, Medical physics.

[38]  K. Miles,et al.  Tumour heterogeneity in non-small cell lung carcinoma assessed by CT texture analysis: a potential marker of survival , 2012, European Radiology.

[39]  Jing Fang,et al.  Computerized characterization of prostate cancer by fractal analysis in MR images , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  F. O’Sullivan,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Sarcoma 18F-FDG Uptake as a Predictor of Patient Outcome , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Hervé Saint-Jalmes,et al.  Can Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Texture Analysis Differentiate Malignant Glioneuronal Tumors from Other Glioblastoma? , 2011, Neurology research international.

[42]  V. Goh,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[43]  I. Poon,et al.  Automated radiation targeting in head-and-neck cancer using region-based texture analysis of PET and CT images. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  G. N. Srinivasan,et al.  Statistical Texture Analysis , 2008 .

[45]  Tahsin Kurc,et al.  Malignant‐lesion segmentation using 4D co‐occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[46]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Assessment of the spatial pattern of colorectal tumour perfusion estimated at perfusion CT using two-dimensional fractal analysis , 2009, European Radiology.

[47]  M. Giger,et al.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[48]  Huan Yu,et al.  Coregistered FDG PET/CT-Based Textural Characterization of Head and Neck Cancer for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  W. Hargrove,et al.  Lacunarity analysis: A general technique for the analysis of spatial patterns. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[50]  Balaji Ganeshan,et al.  Colorectal cancer: texture analysis of portal phase hepatic CT images as a potential marker of survival. , 2009, Radiology.

[51]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[52]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[53]  Dawit Assefa,et al.  Robust texture features for response monitoring of glioblastoma multiforme on T1-weighted and T2-FLAIR MR images: a preliminary investigation in terms of identification and segmentation. , 2010, Medical physics.

[54]  Bal Sanghera,et al.  Reproducibility of 2D and 3D fractal analysis techniques for the assessment of spatial heterogeneity of regional blood flow in rectal cancer. , 2012, Radiology.

[55]  Balaji Ganeshan,et al.  Texture analysis of non-small cell lung cancer on unenhanced computed tomography: initial evidence for a relationship with tumour glucose metabolism and stage , 2010, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[56]  Brandon Whitcher,et al.  Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameter maps , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[57]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[58]  P Vaupel,et al.  Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. , 1996, Cancer research.

[59]  D. Chen,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. , 1999, Radiology.

[60]  Charles A. Harlow,et al.  The Analysis of Radiographic Images , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[61]  Yunyan Zhang,et al.  MRI Texture Analysis in Multiple Sclerosis , 2011, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[62]  A. Villers,et al.  Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features. , 2010, Medical physics.

[63]  Chris R Chatwin,et al.  In search of biologic correlates for liver texture on portal-phase CT. , 2007, Academic Radiology.

[64]  Balaji Ganeshan,et al.  Imaging heterogeneity in gliomas using texture analysis. , 2011 .