Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy in Chronic and Subacute Stroke Patients: A Kinematic Analysis

Objective The aim of this study was to compare motor recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients through clinical assessment scales and a set of kinematic parameters recorded using a robotic system. Design Fifty post-stroke patients, 25 subacute and 25 chronic, and 20 healthy subjects participated in this study. The InMotion 2.0 robotic system for shoulder/elbow rehabilitation was used. Clinical outcome measures were used for assessment. Kinematic parameters related to the speed measured at the robot’s end effector and to the movement’s smoothness were computed. Results The results of this study show that the robot-assisted training can contribute to reduce motor impairment in both subacute and chronic stroke patients. The evaluation of the kinematic parameters and their correlation with the clinical scales highlight some differences in mechanisms of recovery in subacute and chronic stroke patients. Conclusions The proposed set of kinematic parameters and the analysis of the reaching movements’ onset time, associated with a quantitative evaluation of motor improvement provided by the clinical outcome measures, are also able to quantify the changes in the quality of motion obtained after robot-assisted therapy in stroke patients. The higher gain in the subacute stroke patients suggests that the rehabilitative treatment provided at an earlier stage is able to avoid the development of pathologic patterns, resulting in a better quality of motion.

[1]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[2]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[3]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  R. Colombo,et al.  Measuring Changes of Movement Dynamics During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of Stroke Patients , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[7]  S. Mazzoleni,et al.  Robot-aided therapy on the upper limb of subacute and chronic stroke patients: A biomechanical approach , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[8]  James A. Young,et al.  Neuroplasticity and its applications for rehabilitation. , 2011, American journal of therapeutics.

[9]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  T. Mima,et al.  Recovery of upper-limb function due to enhanced use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke patients. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[12]  Loredana Zollo,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[13]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Marko Munih,et al.  Evaluation of upper extremity robot-assistances in subacute and chronic stroke subjects , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  B. Prilutsky,et al.  Gains in Upper Extremity Function After Stroke via Recovery or Compensation: Potential Differential Effects on Amount of Real-World Limb Use , 2009, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[18]  M. Levesley,et al.  Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Mehdi M Mirbagheri,et al.  Upper limb impairments associated with spasticity in neurological disorders , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Upper limb spasticity reduction following active training: a robot-mediated study in patients with chronic hemiparesis. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  S. Brochard,et al.  What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation? , 2010, Current opinion in neurology.

[24]  S. Masiero,et al.  Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  N. Hogan,et al.  Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[26]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  Maura Casadio,et al.  A Haptic Robot Reveals the Adaptation Capability of Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[28]  C. Burgar,et al.  MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[29]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Patrizio Sale,et al.  Robot-aided therapy for upper limbs in patients with stroke-related lesions. Brief report of a clinical experience , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  P. Dario,et al.  Robot-mediated therapy for paretic upper limb of chronic patients following neurological injury. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[33]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[34]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[35]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  UPPER LIMB SPASTICITY REDUCTION FOLLOWING ACTIVE TRAINING: A ROBOT-MEDIATED STUDY IN CHRONIC HEMIPARETIC PATIENTS , 2010 .

[36]  William S. Harwin,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities for Robot-Mediated Neurorehabilitation , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.