Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation Enters the Second Round
暂无分享，去创建一个
The views expressed in this Editorial do not necessarily reflect the views of this journal or of ASM .
Bioinformatic methods are key components in the analysis of large omics data sets now routinely generated in microbiome research. Methods are evaluated using a large variety of benchmark data sets
[1] Brian C. Thomas,et al. A new view of the tree of life , 2016, Nature Microbiology.
[2] Natalia N. Ivanova,et al. 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.
[3] R. Norel,et al. The self-assessment trap: can we all be better than average? , 2011, Molecular systems biology.
[4] Philip D. Blood,et al. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software , 2017, Nature Methods.