Plasma membrane permeabilization by trains of ultrashort electric pulses.

Ultrashort electric pulses (USEP) cause long-lasting increase of cell membrane electrical conductance, and that a single USEP increased cell membrane electrical conductance proportionally to the absorbed dose (AD) with a threshold of about 10 mJ/g. The present study extends quantification of the membrane permeabilization effect to multiple USEP and employed a more accurate protocol that identified USEP effect as the difference between post- and pre-exposure conductance values (Deltag) in individual cells. We showed that Deltag can be increased by either increasing the number of pulses at a constant E-field, or by increasing the E-field at a constant number of pulses. For 60-ns pulses, an E-field threshold of 6 kV/cm for a single pulse was lowered to less than 1.7 kV/cm by applying 100-pulse or longer trains. However, the reduction of the E-field threshold was only achieved at the expense of a higher AD compared to a single pulse exposure. Furthermore, the effect of multiple pulses was not fully determined by AD, suggesting that cells permeabilized by the first pulse(s) in the train become less vulnerable to subsequent pulses. This explanation was corroborated by a model that treated multiple-pulse exposures as a series of single-pulse exposures and assumed an exponential decline of cell susceptibility to USEP as Deltag increased after each pulse during the course of the train.

[1]  Jung-Mu Kim,et al.  Permittivity measurements up to 30 GHz using micromachined probe , 2005 .

[2]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Calcium bursts induced by nanosecond electric pulses. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects on cells and tissues: apoptosis induction and tumor growth inhibition , 2001, PPPS-2001 Pulsed Power Plasma Science 2001. 28th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science and 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. Digest of Papers (Cat. No.01CH37251).

[4]  James C Weaver,et al.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Selective field effects on intracellular vacuoles and vesicle membranes with nanosecond electric pulses. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Martin A Gundersen,et al.  Nanopore-facilitated, voltage-driven phosphatidylserine translocation in lipid bilayers—in cells and in silico , 2006, Physical biology.

[7]  Michael R Murphy,et al.  Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60‐ and 600‐ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[8]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses , 2001, Bioelectromagnetics.

[9]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[10]  James C Weaver,et al.  Electrical behavior and pore accumulation in a multicellular model for conventional and supra-electroporation. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[11]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  Shu Xiao,et al.  Bioelectric Effects of Intense Nanosecond Pulses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[13]  Juergen F. Kolb,et al.  A new pulsed electric field therapy for melanoma disrupts the tumor's blood supply and causes complete remission without recurrence , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[14]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Long‐lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Membrane permeabilization and cell damage by ultrashort electric field shocks. , 2007, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[16]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric fields modulate cell function through intracellular signal transduction mechanisms. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field generators for the study of subcellular effects , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[18]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond, high‐intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[19]  K. Yee Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[20]  John H Ashmore,et al.  Characterization of the cytotoxic effect of high-intensity, 10-ns duration electrical pulses , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[21]  Martin A Gundersen,et al.  Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[22]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Differential effects in cells exposed to ultra-short, high intensity electric fields: cell survival, DNA damage, and cell cycle analysis. , 2003, Mutation research.

[23]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Simulations of nanopore formation and phosphatidylserine externalization in lipid membranes subjected to a high-intensity, ultrashort electric pulse. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Nanoelectropulse-induced phosphatidylserine translocation. , 2004, Biophysical journal.