Three Roles of Conceptual Models in Information System Design and Use

This paper attempts to draw together results from information systems research, linguistic theory, and methodology in order to present a unified framework in which to understand conceptual models. Three different roles of conceptual models (CM's) in the design and use of information systems (IS's) are investigated. The descriptive role of a CM is that it is an abstract representation of the universe of discourse (UoD) of the IS; the normative role of a CM is that it contains prescriptions for the behavior of entities in the UoD. A third role of CM's emerges when a computer is viewed as a symbol-manipulating machine capable of performing speech acts like commanding and promising. These acts are commands or promises only against a background of shared conventions, which is stored in a shared CM. A CM playing this role is called institutional. This paper is an abstract of Wieringa [1989].

[1]  Dennis Tsichritzis,et al.  The ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Framework Report of the Study Group on Dabatase Management Systems , 1978, Inf. Syst..

[2]  Michael L. Brodie,et al.  On Conceptual Modelling , 1984, Topics in Information Systems.

[3]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Algebraic Specification of Object Dynamics in Knowledge Base Domains , 1990, DS-3.

[4]  Cristina Sernadas,et al.  Object-Oriented Specification of Databases: An Algebraic Approach , 1987, VLDB.

[5]  William Kent.  Splitting the Conceptual Schema , 1980, VLDB.

[6]  Michael J. Loux.  Universals and particulars: Readings in ontology , 1977 .

[7]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories , 1970 .

[8]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[9]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  Bureaucracies as deontic systems , 1988, TOIS.

[10]  W. Quine.  The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .

[11]  D. Gabbay,et al.  Sameness and Individuation , 1973 .

[12]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  Performative, Informative and Emotive Systems The First Piece of the PIE , 1984, ICIS.

[13]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[14]  Mia Gosselin,et al.  Particular and General , 1990 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  A speech-act-based office modeling approach , 1988, TOIS.

[16]  Raymond Reiter,et al.  Towards a Logical Reconstruction of Relational Database Theory , 1982, On Conceptual Modelling.

[17]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Specifying Dynamic and Deontic Integrity Constraints , 1989, Data Knowl. Eng..

[18]  Donald Davidson,et al.  On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme , 1973 .

[19]  Setrag Khoshafian,et al.  Object identity , 1986, OOPLSA '86.

[20]  D. A Jardine,et al.  Concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base , 1984 .

[21]  Fernando Flores,et al.  DOING AND SPEAKING IN THE OFFICE , 1980 .

[22]  Wolffried Stucky,et al.  Integrity checking in data base systems , 1983, Inf. Syst..

[23]  Daniel Vanderveken,et al.  Foundations of Illocutionary Logic , 1985 .

[24]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Action based model of information system , 1986, Inf. Syst..

[25]  Nicholas Griffin,et al.  THE PRINCIPLES OF SCIENTIFIC THINKING , 1971 .