A Structural Reliability Analysis Method Based on Radial Basis Function

The first-order reliability method (FORM) is one of the most widely used structural reliability analysis techniques due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, direct using FORM seems disability to work well for complex problems, especially related to high-dimensional variables and computation intensive numerical models. To expand the applicability of the FORM for more practical engineering problems, a response surface (RS) approach based FORM is proposed for structural reliability analysis. The radial basis function (RBF) is employed to approximate the implicit limit-state functions combined with Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) strategy. To guarantee the numerical stability, the improved HL-RF (iHLRF) algorithm is used to assess the reliability index and corresponding probability of failure based on the constructed RS model. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through five numerical examples.

[1]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis , 1993 .

[2]  Sang Hyo Kim,et al.  Response surface method using vector projected sampling points , 1997 .

[3]  P. Das,et al.  Improved response surface method and its application to stiffened plate reliability analysis , 2000 .

[4]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates , 2001 .

[5]  Soo-Chang Kang,et al.  An efficient response surface method using moving least squares approximation for structural reliability analysis , 2010 .

[6]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  High-order limit state functions in the response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[7]  I. Kaymaz,et al.  A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[8]  C. Bucher,et al.  On Efficient Computational Schemes to Calculate Structural Failure Probabilities , 1989 .

[9]  N. Gayton,et al.  CQ2RS: a new statistical approach to the response surface method for reliability analysis , 2003 .

[10]  Xiaoping Du Interval Reliability Analysis , 2007, DAC 2007.

[11]  Hans-Martin Gutmann,et al.  A Radial Basis Function Method for Global Optimization , 2001, J. Glob. Optim..

[12]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[13]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Kiran Solanki,et al.  Improving the accuracy of vehicle crashworthiness response predictions using an ensemble of metamodels , 2009 .

[15]  Irfan Kaymaz,et al.  Application Of Kriging Method To Structural Reliability Problems , 2005 .

[16]  Thomas Most,et al.  A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Fred Moses,et al.  A sequential response surface method and its application in the reliability analysis of aircraft structural systems , 1994 .

[18]  吕震宙,et al.  Advanced response surface method for mechanical reliability analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Jian Deng,et al.  Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network , 2006 .

[20]  Achille Messac,et al.  Metamodeling using extended radial basis functions: a comparative approach , 2006, Engineering with Computers.

[21]  P. Das,et al.  Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis , 2000 .

[22]  C. S. Manohar,et al.  An improved response surface method for the determination of failure probability and importance measures , 2004 .

[23]  Jie Zhang,et al.  A new approach for solving inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions , 2007 .