Generalization of the Output of a Variational Quantum Eigensolver by Parameter Interpolation with a Low-depth Ansatz

The variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is an attracting possible application of near-term quantum computers. Originally, the aim of the VQE is to find a ground state for a given specific Hamiltonian. It is achieved by minimizing the expectation value of the Hamiltonian with respect to an ansatz state by tuning parameters \(\bm{\theta}\) on a quantum circuit which constructs the ansatz. Here we consider an extended problem of the VQE, namely, our objective in this work is to "generalize" the optimized output of the VQE just like machine learning. We aim to find ground states for a given set of Hamiltonians \(\{H(\bm{x})\}\), where \(\bm{x}\) is a parameter which specifies the quantum system under consideration, such as geometries of atoms of a molecule. Our approach is to train the circuit on the small number of \(\bm{x}\)'s. Specifically, we employ the interpolation of the optimal circuit parameter determined at different \(\bm{x}\)'s, assuming that the circuit parameter \(\bm{\theta}\) has simple dependency on a hidden parameter \(\bm{x}\) as \(\bm{\theta}(\bm{x})\). We show by numerical simulations that, using an ansatz which we call the Hamiltonian-alternating ansatz, the optimal circuit parameters can be interpolated to give near-optimal ground states in between the trained \(\bm{x}\)'s. The proposed method can greatly reduce, on a rough estimation by a few orders of magnitude, the time required to obtain ground states for different Hamiltonians by the VQE. Once generalized, the ansatz circuit can predict the ground state without optimizing the circuit parameter \(\bm{\theta}\) in a certain range of \(\bm{x}\).

[1]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.

[3]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[4]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Quantum circuit learning , 2018, Physical Review A.

[5]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[6]  P. Love,et al.  The Bravyi-Kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  Keisuke Fujii,et al.  Harnessing disordered quantum dynamics for machine learning , 2016, 1602.08159.

[8]  John Preskill,et al.  Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.

[9]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.

[10]  Xiao Wang,et al.  Psi4 1.1: An Open-Source Electronic Structure Program Emphasizing Automation, Advanced Libraries, and Interoperability. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  P. Alam ‘T’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[12]  Ryan Babbush,et al.  The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms , 2015, 1509.04279.

[13]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[14]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , 2013, Nature Communications.

[15]  M. Hastings,et al.  Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms , 2015, 1507.08969.

[16]  Kristan Temme,et al.  Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces , 2018, Nature.

[17]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[18]  Maria Schuld,et al.  Quantum Machine Learning in Feature Hilbert Spaces. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[19]  J. Whitfield,et al.  Simulating chemistry using quantum computers. , 2010, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[20]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .