Methodology for a rapid protocol to rule out pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.

We propose an emergency department (ED) pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol based on pretest probability assessment coupled with either a negative D -dimer assay result or a negative D -dimer assay result plus a normal alveolar dead-space measurement. We examine the safety, efficiency, and feasibility of such a protocol, paying special attention to implicit and explicit strategies of pretest probability assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Finally, we assess the potential effect of the proposed pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol on use of imaging resources and ED throughput.

[1]  M. Rodger.  The Bedside Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (BIOPED) Study , 2003 .

[2]  J. Kline.  Impact of a Clinical Decision Rule and a D-dimer plus Alveolar Deadspace Measurement to Rule Out Pulmonary Embolism in an Urban Emergency Department , 2003 .

[3]  J. Kline,et al.  Contribution of indirect computed tomography venography to computed tomography angiography of the chest for the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in two United States emergency departments , 2003, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[4]  S. Goldhaber,et al.  Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  T. Perneger,et al.  Comparison of two clinical prediction rules and implicit assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  B. Rowe,et al.  The accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  H. Büller,et al.  Use of a clinical decision rule in combination with D-dimer concentration in diagnostic workup of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective management study. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  S. Wolf.  The Role of D-dimer and Wells' Criteria in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolus , 2002 .

[9]  Y. Safriel,et al.  CT pulmonary angiography in the detection of pulmonary emboli: a meta-analysis of sensitivities and specificities. , 2002, Clinical imaging.

[10]  J. Kline,et al.  Criteria for the safe use of D-dimer testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter US study. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and d-dimer , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  P. Wells,et al.  Steady-state end-tidal alveolar dead space fraction and D-dimer: bedside tests to exclude pulmonary embolism. , 2001, Chest.

[13]  J. Arnold.  Measurement of the alveolar deadspace: are we there yet? , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[14]  K. Schwartzman,et al.  Strategies incorporating spiral CT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2001, Chest.

[15]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Lung Scintigraphy and Helical Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Meta-Analysis , 2001, Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis.

[16]  B. Gage,et al.  The impact of the introduction of a rapid D-dimer assay on the diagnostic evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[17]  J. Kline,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of a bedside D-dimer assay and alveolar dead-space measurement for rapid exclusion of pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study. , 2001, JAMA.

[18]  T. Perneger,et al.  Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  S. Saini,et al.  Technical cost of CT examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[20]  D. Z. Sands,et al.  Does a Physician's Ability to Accurately Assess the Likelihood of Pulmonary Embolism Increase with Training? , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  G. Raskob,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. , 2000, Annals of internal medicine.

[23]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Active implementation of a consensus strategy improves diagnosis and management in suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2000, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[24]  M. Shaw,et al.  A negative SimpliRED D-dimer assay result does not exclude the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolus in emergency department patients. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  Jeffrey S. Ginsberg,et al.  Comparison of a Clinical Probability Estimate and Two Clinical Models in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[26]  J. Kline,et al.  New diagnostic tests for pulmonary embolism. , 2000, Annals of emergency medicine.

[27]  M Gent,et al.  Derivation of a Simple Clinical Model to Categorize Patients Probability of Pulmonary Embolism: Increasing the Models Utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[28]  J G Hardman,et al.  Estimation of Alveolar Deadspace Fraction Using Arterial and End-Tidal CO2: A Factor Analysis Using a Physiological Simulation , 1999, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[29]  Where do pretest probabilities come from , 1999, Evidence Based Medicine.

[30]  I. Stiell,et al.  Thrombosis in the emergency department: use of a clinical diagnosis model to safely avoid the need for urgent radiological investigation. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  P. de Moerloose,et al.  Performances of a new, rapid and automated microlatex D-dimer assay for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in symptomatic outpatients. , 1998, Thrombosis and haemostasis.

[32]  E. de Raucourt,et al.  Diagnostic value of two rapid and individual D-dimer assays in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: comparison with microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. , 1998, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[33]  P. Pattynama,et al.  Cost-effective diagnostic algorithms in pulmonary embolism: an updated analysis. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[34]  C. Soria,et al.  A new quantitative D-dimer assay appropriate in emergency: reliability of the assay for pulmonary embolism exclusion diagnosis. , 1998, Thrombosis research.

[35]  G D Rubin,et al.  Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans. , 1998, Radiology.

[36]  E. Oger,et al.  Evaluation of a new, rapid, and quantitative D-Dimer test in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. , 1998, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[37]  B. Lämmle,et al.  SimpliRED D-dimer Assay: Comparability of Capillary and Citrated Venous Whole Blood, Between-assay Variability, and Performance of the Test for Exclusion of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Symptomatic Outpatients , 1998, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[38]  F. Heinrich,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an immunoturbidimetric D-dimer assay in the diagnostic procedure of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. , 1997, Thrombosis research.

[39]  J. Kline,et al.  Use of the alveolar dead space fraction (Vd/Vt) and plasma D-dimers to exclude acute pulmonary embolism in ambulatory patients. , 1997, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[40]  J. Kline,et al.  The clinical features of acute pulmonary embolism in ambulatory patients. , 1997, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[41]  I. Virgolini,et al.  Comparison of four rapid D-Dimer tests for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. , 1996, Thrombosis research.

[42]  J. W. Henry,et al.  Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. , 1995, Chest.

[43]  E. Hylek,et al.  Risk Factors for Intracranial Hemorrhage in Outpatients Taking Warfarin , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[44]  R. Robinson.  Economic Evaluation and Health Care Cost-effectiveness analysis , 2006 .

[45]  D. Rosenthal.  Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: The prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis: (PIOPED) investigators. JAMA 1990; Vol. 263: 2753-9 , 1991 .

[46]  J. Bodenhamer.  Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: Saltzman HA, Alavi A, Greenspan RH, et al JAMA 263:2753–2759 May 1990 , 1990 .

[47]  P. Investigators,et al.  Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). , 1990, JAMA.

[48]  C. Giuntini,et al.  Natural course of treated pulmonary embolism. Evaluation by perfusion lung scintigraphy, gas exchange, and chest roentgenogram. , 1990, Chest.

[49]  R. Blumhardt.  Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[50]  W. McCartney,et al.  The role of noninvasive tests versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. , 1981, The American journal of medicine.

[51]  K. Mckusick,et al.  The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram. , 1978, Radiology.