Penetration Rate-Controlled Electrical Resistivity and Temperature Piezocone Penetration Tests in Warm Ice-Rich Permafrost in Northern Quebec, Canada

Electrical resistivity and temperature piezocone penetration test (RTCPTU) was carried out in warm ice-rich permafrost formed in silty soil near Umiujaq, Northern Quebec, Canada, to study the cryostratigraphy of permafrost and adapt soil classification charts for the interpretation of RTCPTU in such environment. A linear pushing system based on an actuator technology was used to accurately control the penetration rate of the piezocone in permafrost. According to the interpretation of the RTCPTU logs, cryostratigraphic contacts and layers such as the thawing front, permafrost table and base, active layer, ice-rich permafrost and perennially noncryotic ground, layers of ice-poor frozen silt, and ice lenses were identified. Due to its reticulated cryostructure made of a sequence of centimetric thick ice lenses and frozen soil layers, ice-rich permafrost is characterized by extremely variable values of cone resistance and friction ratio corrected for pore pressure effects, pore pressure, and electrical resistivity between 5 and 50 MPa, 0.01 and 2%, near zero and 10 MPa, and 0.01 and 20 kΩ-m, respectively. Cone resistance up to 50 MPa, friction ratio down to 0.01%, pore pressure near 10 MPa, and electrical resistivity close to 10 kΩ-m are characteristics of thick ice lenses. The layers of ice-poor frozen silt with high unfrozen water content have cone resistance lower than 10 MPa, friction ratio in excess of 1%, pore pressure lower than 3 MPa, and electrical resistivity lower than 1 kΩ-m. Based on permafrost behaviour types as characterized from the RTCPTU logs, new zones are proposed in soil classification charts to identify frozen soils. These adapted soil classification charts are helpful to practitioners for the interpretation of RTCPTU carried out in permafrost.

[1]  Richard Fortier,et al.  Impacts of permafrost degradation on a road embankment at Umiujaq in Nunavik (Quebec), Canada , 2011 .

[2]  P. Robertson Interpretation of cone penetration tests — a unified approach , 2009 .

[3]  A. LeBlanc,et al.  Internal structure and conditions of permafrost mounds at Umiujaq in Nunavik, Canada, inferred from field investigation and electrical resistivity tomography , 2008 .

[4]  Michel Allard,et al.  Segregated ice structures in various heaved permafrost landforms through CT Scan , 2008 .

[5]  R. Fortier,et al.  Rate-controlled cone penetration tests in permafrost , 2005 .

[6]  Abolfazl Eslami,et al.  Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories , 1997 .

[7]  T. Lunne,et al.  Predicting creep settlements of foundations in permafrost from the results of cone penetration tests , 1995 .

[8]  M. Allard,et al.  A mathematical approach to modelling palsa formation: Insights on processes and growth conditions , 1995 .

[9]  A. V. Sadovskii,et al.  Use of the static penetration test method to investigate the properties of frozen soils , 1991 .

[10]  P. Robertson Soil classification using the cone penetration test , 1990 .

[11]  B. Ladanyi,et al.  Use of the Cone Penetration Test for the Design of Piles in Permafrost , 1985 .

[12]  P. Robertson,et al.  Piezometer–friction cone investigation at a tailings dam , 1984 .

[13]  E. Chamberlain,et al.  Penetration tests in subsea permafrost, Prudhoe Bay, Alaska , 1979 .

[14]  B. Ladanyi Use of the static penetration test in frozen soils , 1976 .

[15]  B. Ladanyi,et al.  CPT in Cold Regions Engineering: A Logging and Design Tool , 1996 .

[16]  T. Lunne,et al.  Experience with the performance of load-controlled cone penetration tests in permafrost and ice , 1992 .

[17]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Use of Piezometer Cone Data , 1986 .