The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks

When a disease breaks out in a human population, changes in behavior in response to the outbreak can alter the progression of the infectious agent. In particular, people aware of a disease in their proximity can take measures to reduce their susceptibility. Even if no centralized information is provided about the presence of a disease, such awareness can arise through first-hand observation and word of mouth. To understand the effects this can have on the spread of a disease, we formulate and analyze a mathematical model for the spread of awareness in a host population, and then link this to an epidemiological model by having more informed hosts reduce their susceptibility. We find that, in a well-mixed population, this can result in a lower size of the outbreak, but does not affect the epidemic threshold. If, however, the behavioral response is treated as a local effect arising in the proximity of an outbreak, it can completely stop a disease from spreading, although only if the infection rate is below a threshold. We show that the impact of locally spreading awareness is amplified if the social network of potential infection events and the network over which individuals communicate overlap, especially so if the networks have a high level of clustering. These findings suggest that care needs to be taken both in the interpretation of disease parameters, as well as in the prediction of the fate of future outbreaks.

[1]  WILLIAM GOFFMAN,et al.  Generalization of Epidemic Theory: An Application to the Transmission of Ideas , 1964, Nature.

[2]  R M May,et al.  A preliminary study of the transmission dynamics of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the causative agent of AIDS. , 1986, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[3]  P. Kaye.  Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[4]  O. Diekmann.  Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases , 1996 .

[5]  T. Philipson,et al.  Private Vaccination and Public Health: An Empirical Examination for U.S. Measles , 1996 .

[6]  V. Joseph Hotz,et al.  The Responsiveness of the Demand for Condoms to the Local Prevalence of AIDS , 1996 .

[7]  W. Edmunds,et al.  Who mixes with whom? A method to determine the contact patterns of adults that may lead to the spread of airborne infections , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  H. Andersson,et al.  Epidemics in a population with social structures. , 1997, Mathematical biosciences.

[9]  M. Keeling,et al.  The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[11]  B T Grenfell,et al.  Individual-based perspectives on R(0). , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[13]  K Macintyre,et al.  "It's not what you know, but who you knew": examining the relationship between behavior change and AIDS mortality in Africa. , 2001, AIDS Education and Prevention.

[14]  C. Fraser,et al.  Transmission Dynamics of the Etiological Agent of SARS in Hong Kong: Impact of Public Health Interventions , 2003, Science.

[15]  D. Earn,et al.  Group interest versus self-interest in smallpox vaccination policy , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Y Chow.  Consensus document on the epidemiology of SARS , 2003 .

[17]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks , 2004, Nature.

[18]  J. Hyman,et al.  Effects of behavioral changes in a smallpox attack model. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[19]  L. Meyers.  Contact network epidemiology: Bond percolation applied to infectious disease prediction and control , 2006 .

[20]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[21]  D Cassi,et al.  Efficiency of information spreading in a population of diffusing agents. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Neil Ferguson,et al.  Capturing human behaviour , 2007, Nature.

[23]  Timothy C. Reluga,et al.  Long-standing influenza vaccination policy is in accord with individual self-interest but not with the utilitarian optimum , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Tao Sun,et al.  Media dependencies in a changing media environment: the case of the 2003 SARS epidemic in China , 2007, New Media Soc..

[25]  Neil M. Ferguson,et al.  The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in U.S. cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Bettinger,et al.  Influenza in Canada: 2007-2008 season update. , 2008, Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada.

[28]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[29]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Theory of Rumour Spreading in Complex Social Networks , 2007, ArXiv.

[30]  M. Salathé,et al.  The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  Ana Perisic,et al.  Social Contact Networks and Disease Eradicability under Voluntary Vaccination , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..