Effect of the injector configuration for opposing jet on the drag and heat reduction

Abstract The drag and heat reduction mechanism in supersonic vehicle has attracted an increasing attention all over the world. Opposing jet, as the one of most practical strategies to achieve the drag and heat reduction, also attracted many researchers' attention. In the current study, the full Navier–Stokes equations and SST k – ω turbulence model have been utilized to obtain the flow field properties around the blunt body, and several novel jet strategies have been employed to induce the drag and heat reduction. The numerical method has been validated against the available experimental data in the open literature, and the grid independency analysis has been performed as well. At last, the effect of different jet strategies on the flow field properties has been investigated. The obtained results show that the pentacle shape owns the best performance of the drag and heat reduction, and its value drops 23.6%. The cirque shape is not effective for the drag and heat reduction. At the same time, the maximum heat flux of square shape is the least, and the position of the maximum heat flux is the farthest away from the jet center in the current study, however the strategy can only drop 15.3% of the drag. Taking drag reduction and thermal protection into consideration together, the square shape owns the best performance. The circle and ellipse shapes can also reduce the drag and the maximum heat flux, but their effects are worse than other jet strategies which own the corner.

[1]  Wei Huang,et al.  Drag and heat reduction mechanism in the combinational opposing jet and acoustic cavity concept for hypersonic vehicles , 2015 .

[2]  Gopalan Jagadeesh,et al.  Counterflow drag reduction by supersonic jet for a blunt body in hypersonic flow , 2006 .

[3]  Xiao-Qian Chen,et al.  Numerical and experimental study on waverider with blunt leading edge , 2013 .

[4]  G. R. Hutt,et al.  Forward facing spike effects on bodies of different cross section in supersonic flow , 1989, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[5]  Jun Liu,et al.  Influences of the turbulence model and the slot width on the transverse slot injection flow field in supersonic flows , 2012 .

[6]  Zhao Tao Entrance of 6Sigma Deployment in Chinese Corporations , 2004 .

[7]  Kentaro Hayashi,et al.  Effect of Pressure Ratio on Aerodynamic Heating Reduction due to Opposing Jet , 2003 .

[8]  Li Yan,et al.  Progress in research on mixing techniques for transverse injection flow fields in supersonic crossflows , 2013, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A.

[9]  Rong Yisheng,et al.  Drag reduction research in supersonic flow with opposing jet , 2013 .

[10]  Shigeru Aso,et al.  Numerical study of thermal protection system by opposing jet , 2005 .

[11]  Ann Karagozian,et al.  Transverse jets and their control , 2010 .

[12]  Kozo Fujii,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Flows Around a Spiked Blunt Body , 1995 .

[13]  Chaoying Zhou,et al.  A three-dimensional numerical investigation on drag reduction of a supersonic spherical body with an opposing jet , 2014 .

[14]  D. Wilcox Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[15]  Wei Huang,et al.  A survey of drag and heat reduction in supersonic flows by a counterflowing jet and its combinations , 2015 .

[16]  Shigeru Aso,et al.  Experimental Study on Thermal Protection System by Opposing Jet in Supersonic Flow , 2006 .

[17]  Shigeru Aso,et al.  A study on supersonic mixing by circular nozzle with various injection angles for air breathing engine , 2006 .

[18]  Xi-Yun Lu,et al.  Numerical investigation of a jet from a blunt body opposing a supersonic flow , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Li Yan,et al.  Performance evaluation and parametric analysis on cantilevered ramp injector in supersonic flows , 2013 .

[20]  V. I. Lagutin,et al.  Aerodynamic drag reduction by plasma and hot-gas injection , 2000 .