Advancing Supersonic Retropropulsion Using Mars-Relevant Flight Data: An Overview

Advanced robotic and human missions to Mars require landed masses well in excess of current capabilities. One approach to safely land these large payloads on the Martian surface is to extend the propulsive capability currently required during subsonic descent to supersonic initiation velocities. However, until recently, no rocket engine had ever been fired into an opposing supersonic freestream. In September 2013, SpaceX performed the first supersonic retropropulsion (SRP) maneuver to decelerate the entry of the first stage of their Falcon 9 rocket. Since that flight, SpaceX has continued to perform SRP for the reentry of their vehicle first stage, having completed multiple SRP events in Mars-relevant conditions in July 2017. In FY 2014, NASA and SpaceX formed a three-year public-private partnership centered upon SRP data analysis. These activities focused on flight reconstruction, CFD analysis, a visual and infrared imagery campaign, and Mars EDL design analysis. This paper provides an overview of these activities undertaken to advance the technology readiness of Mars SRP.

[1]  J.R. Cruz,et al.  A Survey of Supersonic Retropropulsion Technology for Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2008, 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[2]  P. O. Jarvinen,et al.  The aerodynamic characteristics of large angled cones with retrorockets , 1970 .

[3]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Supersonic Retropropulsion Experimental Results from NASA Ames 9×7 Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel , 2014 .

[4]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Toward Supersonic Retropropulsion CFD Validation , 2011 .

[5]  Charles H. Campbell,et al.  Advancing Supersonic Retro-Propulsion Technology Readiness: Infrared Observations of the SpaceX Falcon 9 First Stage , 2017 .

[6]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Supersonic Retropropulsion Thrust Vectoring for Mars Precision Landing , 2015 .

[7]  P. J. Finley,et al.  The flow of a jet from a body opposing a supersonic free stream , 1966, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  David J. Kinney,et al.  Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis Study: Phase 1 Report , 2010 .

[9]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  A High-Heritage Blunt-Body Entry, Descent, and Landing Concept for Human Mars Exploration , 2016 .

[10]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Supersonic Retropropulsion Plume Structures , 2013 .

[11]  Walter C. Engelund,et al.  Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis Study: Phase 2 Report on Exploration Feed-Forward Systems , 2011 .

[12]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Comparison of Navier-Stokes Flow Solvers to Falcon 9 Supersonic Retropropulsion Flight Data , 2017 .

[13]  R. Manning,et al.  Mars Exploration Entry, Descent, and Landing Challenges , 2007 .

[14]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Computational Aerodynamic Predictions of Supersonic Retropropulsion Flowfields , 2013 .

[15]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Survey of Supersonic Retropropulsion Technology for Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing , 2009 .

[16]  Karl T. Edquist,et al.  Continuing Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Supersonic Retropropulsion , 2012 .

[17]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Supersonic Retropropulsion Experimental Results from the NASA Ames 9- x 7-Foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel , 2012 .

[18]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Supersonic Retropropulsion Experimental Results from the NASA Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel , 2011 .

[19]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Application of a Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Approach to Supersonic Retropropulsion Flowfields , 2013 .

[20]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Feasibility of Supersonic Retropropulsion Based on Assessment of Mars-Relevant Flight Data , 2017 .

[21]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Conceptual Modeling of Supersonic Retropropulsion Flow Interactions and Relationships to System Performance , 2013 .