GAMEDE: A global activity model for evaluating the sustainability of dairy enterprises. Part II - Interactive simulation of various management strategies with diverse stakeholders

GAMEDE is a stock-flow dynamic simulation model designed with farmers to represent dairy farm functioning and the consequences of the farmer's daily management decisions for whole-farm sustainability. Sustainability is evaluated according to its three pillars: technico-economic viability, respect for environment, and social liveability. The model provides original information for a better understanding of the processes regulating nitrogen dynamics within the farm, and the factors determining farmers' decisions and practices. Model implementation experiments have revealed that GAMEDE is also a useful tool to support discussions and to generate knowledge exchange among various stakeholders who play an important role in the development of farm sustainability: farmers, extension agents and researchers. While a majority of researchers and advisers are specialised and a majority of farmers fix their attention on specific and narrow themes of farm management, such a comprehensive model can help stakeholders complement their knowledge to gain a holistic view of the farming system. This holistic and integrated view is crucial: (i) for researchers who wish to explain diversity in farming systems and understand decisional and biophysical processes and their interrelated effects operating in such complex agro-ecosystems, (ii) for advisers whose aim is to define alternative management strategies applicable in practice, i.e. taking into account farm specificities, and (iii) for farmers who must choose practices compatible with their resources, assets, constraints and objectives. Holism can also improve versatility and thus the generic character of models. Issues are narrowly specified and greatly vary both among categories of stakeholders (e.g. scientists versus farmers) and within each category (e.g. among farmers). A comprehensive model that: (i) details all farm management operations, and (ii) represents their effects on different spatio-temporal levels and on the three sustainability dimensions, is more likely to respond to the various issues facing different stakeholders. We argue that capacity of models to respond to stakeholders' questions has to be considered in future evaluations of decision support systems.

[1]  K. Popper.  The Poverty of Historicism , 1959 .

[2]  R. Mccown,et al.  Learning to bridge the gap between science-based decision support and the practice of farming: Evolution in paradigms of model-based research and intervention from design to dialogue , 2001 .

[3]  Edward J. Rykiel,et al.  Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation , 1996 .

[4]  Jean-Marie Paillat,et al.  Modelling biomass fluxes and fertility transfers : Animal wastes management in Reunion Island , 2003 .

[5]  collectif ComMod.  La modélisation comme outil d'accompagnement , 2005 .

[6]  M. Robertson,et al.  The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers', advisers', researchers' monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation , 2002 .

[7]  François Bocquier,et al.  Explaining the diversity of environmental performances according to a typology of farming practices combinations. The case of the dairy cattle breeding in Reunion Island , 2006 .

[8]  Michael Wallace,et al.  Farmer Decision‐Making with Conflicting Goals: A Recursive Strategic Programming Analysis , 2002 .

[9]  H. Berge,et al.  An evaluation of whole farm nitrogen balances and related indices for efficient nitrogen use , 2003 .

[10]  Steven Schilizzi,et al.  `Why do farmers do it?' Validating whole-farm models , 1997 .

[11]  Jeff Maynard,et al.  Computer programming management , 1972 .

[12]  Peter A. Corning,et al.  The re-emergence of "emergence": A venerable concept in search of a theory , 2002, Complex..

[13]  Kevin A. Parton,et al.  Learning from the historical failure of farm management models to aid management practice. Part 2. Three systems approaches , 2006 .

[14]  J. Simon,et al.  Typologie des bilans d'azote de divers types d'exploitation agricole: recherche d'indicateurs de fonctionnement , 2000 .

[15]  M. Ittersum,et al.  Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models , 2007 .

[16]  Jean-Marie Paillat,et al.  A conceptual representation of animal waste management at the farm scale: The case of the Reunion Island , 2006 .

[17]  R. L. McCown,et al.  Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects , 2002 .

[18]  C. Cederberg,et al.  Life cycle assessment of milk production — a comparison of conventional and organic farming , 2000 .

[19]  G. Van Huylenbroeck,et al.  A methodology for the calculation of farm level nitrogen and phosphorus balances in Flemish agriculture , 2003 .

[20]  M. P. Collinson,et al.  A History of Farming Systems Research , 2000 .

[21]  Pascal Beguin.  Une approche opérative de la simulation , 2006 .

[22]  L. Bertalanffy.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1977 .

[23]  G. Beers,et al.  Farmers in small-scale and large-scale farming in a new perspective. Objectives, decision making and information requirements. , 1996 .

[24]  François Bousquet,et al.  Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review , 2004 .

[25]  Philippe Lecomte,et al.  GAMEDE: A global activity model for evaluating the sustainability of dairy enterprises Part I - Whole-farm dynamic model , 2009 .

[26]  M. C. Hanegraaf,et al.  Perspectives and limitations of the Dutch minerals accounting system (MINAS) , 2003 .

[27]  R. D. Hurrion.  An interactive visual simulation system for industrial management , 1980 .

[28]  Peter C. Bell,et al.  Visual interactive simulation modeling in a decision support role , 1990, Comput. Oper. Res..

[29]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  A language for (disputed) learning: the use of computer generated mineral balances by dairy farmers and extension workers in the Netherlands. , 1995 .

[30]  W. de Vries,et al.  Approaches and uncertainties in nutrient budgets: implications for nutrient management and environmental policies , 2003 .

[31]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Decision support using traditional simulation and visual interactive simulation , 1994 .

[32]  Kevin A. Parton,et al.  Learning from the historical failure of farm management models to aid management practice. Part 1. The rise and demise of theoretical models of farm economics , 2006 .

[33]  François Beaudeau,et al.  Relationships between culling criteria in dairy herds and farmers' management styles. , 1996 .

[34]  R. H. Fawcett,et al.  Using farmer decision-making profiles and managerial capacity as predictors of farm management and performance in Costa Rican dairy farms , 2006 .

[35]  Ingrid Öborn,et al.  Element balances as a tool for sustainable nutrient management: a critical appraisal of their merits and limitations within an agronomic and environmental context , 2003 .

[36]  M. Rufino.  Quantifying the contribution of crop-livestock integration to African farming , 2008 .

[37]  Jonathan Vayssières.  L'appréhension des pratiques décisionnelles d'éleveurs par enquête-immersion : cas des activités à l'origine de flux d'azote en exploitations bovines laitières à la Réunion , 2004 .

[38]  Jean-François Martiné,et al.  Modélisation de la production potentielle de la canne à sucre en zone tropicale, sous conditions thermiques et hydriques contrastées. Applications du modèle , 2003 .

[39]  M. Budyko,et al.  The Evolution of the Biosphere , 1986 .

[40]  Niels Halberg,et al.  Input output accounting systems in the European community*/an appraisal of their usefulness in raising awareness of environmental problems , 2003 .