A novel application of lemmatize and thematic analysis to understand protective measures perspectives of patients with chronic respiratory disease during the first outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

Objective To describe the perspectives of a group of COPD patients during the first outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and narrate the emotions and polarity (acceptance-rejection) regarding living with COPD during the pandemic. Design/methods We used a novel application of lemmatization and thematic analysis of participants’ narratives. A study was carried out with eight patients with moderate–severe-very severe COPD during the first outbreak of COVID-19 using purposive sampling. In-depth interviews and field notes from the researchers were used to collect data. A statistical content analysis (lemmatization) of the patients’ narratives was performed. Additionally, inductive thematic analysis was used to identify emerging themes. This study was conducted following the guidelines of Consolidated Criteria/Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles articulated in the WMA Declaration of Helsinki. Participants provided verbal informed consent prior to their inclusion as previously described. Results The average age of our sample was 65 years, and 75% of the patients suffered from moderate COPD, 12.5% from severe COPD, and 12.5% from very severe COPD according to GOLD criteria. The lemmatized and sentiment analysis showed a predominance of positive emotions, and the polarity of the interviews indicated a very slight positive trend towards acceptance of the experience lived during the pandemic. Additionally, three main themes were identified: (1) Confinement and restriction measures, (2) COVID-19 and protective measures, and (3) Clinical care during the first outbreak of the pandemic. Conclusion Patients experienced confinement with a feeling of security and protection. They strictly respect social distancing. They used masks, but these caused them to feel short of breath and fatigue, especially FFP2 masks. Half of the patients rejected the possibility of being vaccinated. Finally, they were very satisfied with the clinical care they received in the COPD unit of their hospital. Our results show that COPD patients have not experienced a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

[1]  R. Koyama,et al.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on COPD exacerbations in Japanese patients: a retrospective study , 2024, Scientific reports.

[2]  F. Early,et al.  A critical interpretive synthesis of the lived experiences and health and patient-reported outcomes of people living with COPD who isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2023, European Respiratory Review.

[3]  Nikhil T. Awatade,et al.  The Complex Association between COPD and COVID-19 , 2023, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  C. Osadnik,et al.  Healthcare experience of adults with COPD during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review of international literature , 2023, BMJ Open Respiratory Research.

[5]  Judit Nóra Pintér,et al.  Preliminary study of the exploration patients' experiences of chronic respiratory experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic using interpretative phenomenological analysis , 2022, Psychiatry Research Communications.

[6]  S. Ramanadhan,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods in Chronic Disease: Introduction and Opportunities to Promote Health Equity , 2021, Annual review of public health.

[7]  M. Hennink,et al.  Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. , 2021, Social science & medicine.

[8]  A. Arnaert,et al.  Experiences of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease receiving integrated telehealth nursing services during COVID-19 lockdown , 2021, BMC Nursing.

[9]  C. Thorup,et al.  Social Distancing among COPD Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic – A Qualitative Study , 2021, COPD.

[10]  V. Atashi,et al.  Exploring the barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study , 2021, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  M. Miravitlles,et al.  Reduction in hospitalised COPD exacerbations during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, PloS one.

[12]  L. Low,et al.  COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy—A Scoping Review of Literature in High-Income Countries , 2021, Vaccines.

[13]  I. Grattagliano,et al.  Narrative Analysis of the Impact of COVID-19 on Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Their Caregivers, and Healthcare Professionals in Italy , 2021, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[14]  M. Abdelrahim,et al.  Public awareness about coronavirus vaccine, vaccine acceptance, and hesitancy , 2021, Journal of medical virology.

[15]  C. Herbst,et al.  Covid-19 and non-communicable diseases: evidence from a systematic literature review , 2021, BMC Public Health.

[16]  P. Tubert-Bitter,et al.  Chronic respiratory diseases are predictors of severe outcome in COVID-19 hospitalised patients: a nationwide study , 2021, European Respiratory Journal.

[17]  Colin Simpson,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the incidence and mortality of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: national interrupted time series analyses for Scotland and Wales , 2021, BMC Medicine.

[18]  R. Birkelund,et al.  Experiences in responders and non-responders to pulmonary rehabilitation among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a clinical study with convergent mixed analysis , 2021, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  Anna Kjellsdotter,et al.  Together for the Future – Development of a Digital Website to Support Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Self-Management: A Qualitative Study , 2021, Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare.

[20]  J. Soriano,et al.  Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021: Updated Pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. , 2021, Archivos de bronconeumologia.

[21]  M. Sucena,et al.  Reduction of Severe Exacerbations of COPD during COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal: A Protective Role of Face Masks? , 2021, COPD.

[22]  Dorthe Sørensen,et al.  Living with the risk of being infected: COPD patients' experiences during the coronavirus pandemic , 2021, Journal of clinical nursing.

[23]  G. Peces-Barba,et al.  COPD Clinical Control: predictors and long-term follow-up of the CHAIN cohort , 2021, Respiratory Research.

[24]  M. Camacho-Rivera,et al.  Determinants of COVID-19 preventive behaviours among adults with chronic diseases in the USA: an analysis of the nationally representative COVID-19 impact survey , 2021, BMJ Open.

[25]  J. Ena,et al.  Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of COPD Patients Hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[26]  M. Miravitlles,et al.  The Experience of COPD Patients in Lockdown Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[27]  J. Soriano,et al.  Prevalence and Determinants of COPD in Spain: EPISCAN II. , 2020, Archivos de bronconeumologia.

[28]  D. Sanchez-Ramirez,et al.  Underlying respiratory diseases, specifically COPD, and smoking are associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Respiratory Medicine.

[29]  N. Hopkinson,et al.  COVID-19 related concerns of people with long-term respiratory conditions: a qualitative study , 2020, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[30]  S. Merler,et al.  Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. , 2020, JAMA.

[31]  Claúdio Gleidiston Lima da Silva,et al.  The emotional impact of Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (new Coronavirus disease) , 2020, Psychiatry Research.

[32]  M. Miravitlles,et al.  Clinical Control in COPD: A New Therapeutic Objective? , 2020, Archivos de bronconeumologia.

[33]  Favourate Sebele Mpofu Saturation controversy in qualitative research: Complexities and underlying assumptions. A literature review , 2020, Cogent Social Sciences.

[34]  Sergi Fàbregues,et al.  Fundamentals of case study research in family medicine and community health , 2019, Family Medicine and Community Health Journal.

[35]  Mandy M. Archibald,et al.  Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants , 2019, International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

[36]  J. Barnett,et al.  Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period , 2018, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[37]  E. Casey,et al.  An Examination of the Sufficiency of Small Qualitative Samples , 2018, Social Work Research.

[38]  S. Centanni,et al.  Enlightening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through patients’ and caregivers’ narratives , 2018, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[39]  Julius Sim,et al.  Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? , 2018 .

[40]  T. Delespierre,et al.  Empirical advances with text mining of electronic health records , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[41]  J. Wedzicha,et al.  Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report , 2017, Respirology.

[42]  V. Marconi,et al.  Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation , 2017, Qualitative health research.

[43]  Costas S. Constantinou,et al.  A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews , 2017 .

[44]  D. Cook,et al.  Narrative medicine and death in the ICU: word clouds as a visual legacy , 2016, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[45]  K. Malterud,et al.  Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies , 2016, Qualitative health research.

[46]  Bedrettin Yazan,et al.  Three Approaches to Case Study Methods in Education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake , 2015 .

[47]  Bridget C. O’Brien,et al.  Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[48]  Saif Mohammad,et al.  CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON , 2013, Comput. Intell..

[49]  Maite Taboada,et al.  Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis , 2011, CL.

[50]  P. Jones,et al.  Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test , 2009, European Respiratory Journal.

[51]  S. Jack,et al.  Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers , 2008 .

[52]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[53]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[54]  Arul Earnest,et al.  A multidimensional grading system (BODE index) as predictor of hospitalization for COPD. , 2005, Chest.

[55]  B. Celli,et al.  The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[56]  Michael C. Mosier,et al.  Rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[57]  Actualización 2021 de la Guía Española de la EPOC (GesEPOC). Tratamiento farmacológico de la EPOC estable , 2022, Archivos de Bronconeumología.

[58]  A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs , 2016 .

[59]  Alarcos Cieza,et al.  Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[60]  Bing Liu,et al.  Sentiment Analysis and Subjectivity , 2010, Handbook of Natural Language Processing.

[61]  J. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design , 1998 .