Genes contribute to the switching dynamics of bistable perception.

Ordinarily, the visual system provides an unambiguous representation of the world. However, at times alternative plausible interpretations of a given stimulus arise, resulting in a dynamic perceptual alternation of the differing interpretations, commonly referred to as bistable or rivalrous perception. Recent research suggests that common neural mechanisms may be involved in the dynamics of very different types of bistable phenomena. Further, evidence has emerged that genetic factors may be involved in determining the rate of switch for at least one form of bistable perception, known as binocular rivalry. The current study evaluated whether genetic factors contribute to the switching dynamics for distinctly different variants of bistable perception in the same participant sample. Switching rates were recorded for MZ and DZ twin participants in two different bistable perception tasks, binocular rivalry and the Necker Cube. Strong concordance in switching rates across both tasks was evident for MZ but not DZ twins, indicating that genetic factors indeed contribute to the dynamics of multiple forms of bistable perception.

[1]  Current Biology , 2012, Current Biology.

[2]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Meditation alters perceptual rivalry in Tibetan Buddhist monks , 2005, Current Biology.

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  Nicholas G Martin,et al.  Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Attention Speeds Binocular Rivalry , 2006, Psychological science.

[6]  R. Wilfred George,et al.  The Significance of the Fluctuations Experienced in Observing Ambiguous Figures and in Binocular Rivalry , 1936 .

[7]  A. Yoshino,et al.  Effects of selective 5-HT1A agonist tandospirone on the rate and rhythmicity of binocular rivalry , 2008, Psychopharmacology.

[8]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[9]  Randolph Blake,et al.  What causes alternations in dominance during binocular rivalry? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Hueting,et al.  Individual and interindividual differences in binocular retinal rivalry in man. , 1966, Psychophysiology.

[11]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[12]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? , 2003, Perception.

[13]  Felix Hasler,et al.  Modulating the Rate and Rhythmicity of Perceptual Rivalry Alternations with the Mixed 5-HT2A and 5-HT1A Agonist Psilocybin , 2005, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[14]  M. Donnelly,et al.  Ingested ethanol and binocular rivalry. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.