Before the N400: Effects of lexical–semantic violations in visual cortex

[1]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[2]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[8]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[9]  A. Marantz,et al.  A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Gonzalo Navarro,et al.  A guided tour to approximate string matching , 2001, CSUR.

[11]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.

[14]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.

[16]  S. Monsell.  Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[21]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[24]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  An MEG Study of Silent Meaning , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Bar.  The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Kara D. Federmeier.  Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[28]  C. Summerfield,et al.  A Neural Representation of Prior Information during Perceptual Inference , 2008, Neuron.

[29]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Lexical access in early stages of visual word processing: A single-trial correlational MEG study of heteronym recognition , 2009, Brain and Language.

[30]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A lexical basis for N400 context effects: Evidence from MEG , 2009, Brain and Language.

[31]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: An Event-Related Potential Study of Lexical Relationships and Prediction in Context. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[32]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Localization of the syntactic mismatch negativity in the temporal cortex: An MEG study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[34]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.

[35]  C. Dobel,et al.  Effects of language comprehension on visual processing – MEG dissociates early perceptual and late N400 effects , 2011, Brain and Language.

[36]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .