Logistics planning under uncertainty for disposition of radioactive wastes

The US Department of Energy (DOE) faces an enormous environmental remediation challenge involving highly radioactive wastes at former weapons production facilities. The purpose of this analysis is to focus on equipment acquisition and fleet sizing issues related to transportation of wastes from remediation sites to disposal sites. Planning for the transportation of these wastes must be done with recognition of important uncertainties related to overall quantities of waste to be moved, the rate at which the wastes will be prepared for transport, and the certification of suitable transportation containers for use in the effort. However, deadlines for completion of the effort have already been set by the political process, without much regard for these uncertainties. To address this fleet sizing problem, we have created a robust optimization model that focuses on equipment investment decisions. Through this robust optimization, we illustrate how modeling can be used to explore the effects of uncertainty on the equipment acquisition strategy. The disposition of radioactive wastes from DOE sites is an important illustration of a category of problems where equipment investments must be made under conditions of considerable uncertainty. The methodology illustrated in this paper can be applied to this general class of problems.

[1]  D. Tasche,et al.  On the coherence of expected shortfall , 2001, cond-mat/0104295.

[2]  George F. List,et al.  An Integrated Network/Planar Multiobjective Model for Routing and Siting for Hazardous Materials and Wastes , 1991, Transp. Sci..

[3]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  Dynamic and Stochastic Models for the Allocation of Empty Containers , 1993, Oper. Res..

[4]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  Integrated Routing and Scheduling in Hazardous Materials Transportation , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[5]  Dean A. Jones,et al.  Robust optimization for fleet planning under uncertainty , 2003 .

[6]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Fleet Sizing under Production Cycles and Uncertain Travel Times , 1986, Transp. Sci..

[7]  Linos F. Frantzeskakis,et al.  A Successive Linear Approximation Procedure for Stochastic, Dynamic Vehicle Allocation Problems , 1990, Transp. Sci..

[8]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  Modeling and Analysis for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Risk Analysis, Routing/Scheduling and Facility Location , 1991, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  A Model for Fleet Sizing and Vehicle Allocation , 1991, Transp. Sci..

[10]  G. F. List,et al.  Routing and emergency-response-team siting for high-level radioactive waste shipments , 1998 .

[11]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Models and Algorithms for Distribution Problems with Uncertain Demands , 1996, Transp. Sci..

[12]  Leon N. Moses,et al.  Transportation of Hazardous Materials , 1993 .

[13]  G. List Siting Emergency Response Teams: Tradeoffs Among Response Time, Risk, Risk Equity and Cost , 1993 .

[14]  Said Salhi,et al.  Facility Location: A Survey of Applications and Methods , 1996 .

[15]  R. Hall,et al.  Fleet sizing and empty equipment redistribution for center-terminal transportation networks , 1997 .

[16]  Vedat Verter,et al.  Hazardous Materials Logistics , 1995 .

[17]  D. Tasche,et al.  Expected Shortfall: a natural coherent alternative to Value at Risk , 2001, cond-mat/0105191.

[18]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Optimal Routing of Hazardous Materials in Stochastic, Time-Varying Transportation Networks , 1998 .

[19]  Jared L. Cohon,et al.  Simultaneous Siting and Routing in the Disposal of Hazardous Wastes , 1991, Transp. Sci..

[20]  Robert J. Vanderbei,et al.  Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems , 1995, Oper. Res..

[21]  Randolph W. Hall STOCHASTIC FREIGHT FLOW PATTERNS: IMPLICATIONS FOR FLEET OPTIMIZATION , 1999 .

[22]  Peter Kall,et al.  Stochastic Programming , 1995 .

[23]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1997 .

[24]  D. Keefer,et al.  Three-Point Approximations for Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .