Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real

This paper addresses the general issue of whether the practice of investigating human decision making in hypothetical choice situations is at all warranted, or under what conditions. A particularly relevant factor that affects the match between real decisions and hypothetical decisions is the importance of a decisions consequences. In the literature experimental gambles tend to confound the reality of the decision situation with the size of the payoffs: hypothetical decisions tend to offer large payoffs, and real decisions tend to offer only small payoffs. Using the well-known framing effect (a tendency of risk-aversion for gains and of risk-seeking for losses) we find that the framing effect depends on payoff size but hypothetical choices match real choices for small as well as large payoffs. These results appear paradoxical unless size of incentive is clearly distinguished from the reality status of decision (real versus hypothetical). Since the field lacks a general theory of when hypothetical decisions match real decisions, the discussion presents an outline for developing such a theory. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

[1]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[2]  Kazuhisa Takemura,et al.  Influence of Elaboration on the Framing of Decision , 1994 .

[3]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[4]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[5]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[6]  H. P. Binswanger.  Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural india , 1980 .

[7]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[8]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Venture Theory: A Model of Decision Weights , 1990 .

[9]  P. Slovic,et al.  Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking , 1968 .

[10]  David M. Grether,et al.  Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence , 1992 .

[11]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists , 1994 .

[12]  J. Payne,et al.  Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code , 1999 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Who accepts Savage's axiom? , 1974 .

[15]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Colin Camerer.  Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[17]  K. Abromeit.  Music Received , 2023, Notes.

[18]  S Epstein,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results , 1990 .

[20]  W. Edwards,et al.  Probability-preferences in gambling. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  The Impact of Incentives Upon Risky Choice , 1997 .

[22]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Money, Kisses, and Electric Shocks: On the Affective Psychology of Risk , 2001, Psychological science.

[23]  V. Smith,et al.  Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics , 2000 .

[24]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  Comparing Risky Decision Making Under Conditions of Real and Hypothetical Consequences , 1996 .

[25]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior , 1979 .

[26]  I. Levin,et al.  Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles , 1988 .

[27]  L. Sanna,et al.  Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence , 1996 .

[28]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[30]  Robert J. Reilly,et al.  Preference Reversal: Further Evidence and Some Suggested Modifications in Experimental Design , 1982 .

[31]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[32]  Olympic Medalists,et al.  When Less Is More: Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction Among , 2004 .

[33]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[34]  Janet A. Sniezek,et al.  Influences on the appropriateness of confidence in judgment: Practice, effort, information, and decision-making , 1991 .

[35]  Gretchen B. Chapman,et al.  Sooner or Later , 2003 .

[36]  C. Plott,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon , 1979 .

[37]  R. Thaler,et al.  Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice , 1990 .

[38]  Paul W. Paese.  Effects of Framing on Actual Time Allocation Decisions , 1995 .

[39]  G. Loewenstein.  Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[40]  A. Kühberger,et al.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  G. Loomes,et al.  The Impact of Incentives Upon Risky Choice Experiments , 1997 .

[42]  Friedrich Schneider,et al.  Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: A Reexamination , 1982 .

[43]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected utility theory and the experiments , 1994 .

[44]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  A Bias in the Prediction of Tastes , 1995 .

[46]  P. Slovic.  Differential effects of real versus hypothetical payoffs on choices among gambles. , 1969 .

[47]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  A Fundamental Prediction Error: Self-Others Discrepancies in Risk Preference , 1997 .

[48]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: When Less Is More: Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction among Olympic Medalists , 2002 .

[49]  J. Pligt,et al.  The impact of probability and magnitude of outcome on disappointment and elation , 1997 .

[50]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[51]  N. Wilcox.  Lottery choice: incentives, complexity and decision time , 1993 .

[52]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .

[53]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Winston R. Sieck,et al.  Exposition Effects on Decision Making: Choice and Confidence in Choice , 1997 .

[55]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion , 1991 .

[56]  Gretchen B. Chapman,et al.  Sooner or Later: The Psychology of Intertemporal Choice , 1998 .

[57]  L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems. , 1992 .

[58]  Kazuhisa Takemura.  Effect of decision time on framing of decision : a case of risky choice behavior , 1992 .

[59]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .