Interaction in Information Retrieval: Trends Over Time

This review examines a sample of interactive information retrieval (IR) systems within the framework of a design challenge set forth by John Bennett in 1971. Bennett directed his challenge to a group of information scientists who attended The User Interface for Interactive Search of Bibliographic Data Bases Workshop. During the workshop, participants exchanged their insights and experiences on various aspects of user interface requirements for interactive IR systems and discussed system design features that could result in the design of more effective user interfaces for information retrieval. The main goals of this review are to characterize interactive IR design trends over time, examine the extent to which IR systems have responded to Bennett's design challenge, and to suggest potential future research directions and challenges.

[1]  Michael David Williams,et al.  What Makes RABBIT Run? , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  Alina Vickery,et al.  A Reference and referral System using Expert System Techniques , 1987, J. Documentation.

[3]  Colin Burke The other Memex: The tangled career of Vannevar Bush's Information Machine, The Rapid Selector , 1992 .

[4]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Distributed expert problem treatment as a model for information system analysis and design , 1982 .

[5]  Donald E. Walker Interactive bibliographic search : the user/computer interface , 1971 .

[6]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Rutgers' TREC 2001 Interactive Track Experience , 2001, TREC.

[7]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[8]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness , 1988 .

[9]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Improved subject access, browsing and scanning mechanisms in modern on-line IR , 1986, SIGIR '86.

[10]  Dennis E. Egan,et al.  Individual Differences In Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[11]  Micheline Hancock-Beaulieu,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of an Online Library Catalogue on subject Searching behaviour at the Catalogue and T the shelves , 1991, J. Documentation.

[12]  David Ellis,et al.  A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design , 1989, J. Documentation.

[13]  William R. Hersh,et al.  A Comparison of Boolean and Natural Language Searching for the TREC-6 Interactive Task , 1997, TREC.

[14]  Karen Spärck Jones,et al.  Natural language processing for information retrieval , 1996, CACM.

[15]  Richard M. Tong,et al.  RUBRIC: an environment for full text information retrieval , 1985, SIGIR '85.

[16]  Louise T. Su Evaluation Measures for Interactive Information Retrieval , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[17]  Austin Henderson,et al.  RABBIT: An Intelligent Database Assistant , 1982, AAAI.

[18]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[19]  Giovanni Guida,et al.  IR-NLI II: applying man-machine interaction and artificial intelligence conceptsto information retrieval , 1988, SIGIR '88.

[20]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[21]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Interfaces for end‐user information seeking , 1992 .

[22]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  User interfaces for information systems , 1991, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  Some measures and procedures for evaluation of the user interface in an information retrieval system , 1988, SIGIR '88.

[24]  Marti A. Hearst TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access , 1995, CHI '95.

[25]  Trudi Bellardo An investigation of online searcher traits and their relationship to search outcome , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[26]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  MEDLARS: Report on the Evaluation of Its Operating Efficiency. , 1997 .

[27]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[28]  Charles T. Meadow,et al.  A Computer Intermediary for Interactive Database Searching. I. Design , 2007, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Lauren B. Doyle,et al.  Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers , 1961, JACM.

[30]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[31]  William L. Verplank,et al.  Graphic Challenges in Designing Object-oriented User Interfaces , 1988 .

[32]  Mark E. Frisse,et al.  Information retrieval from hypertext: update on the dynamic medical handbook project , 1989, Hypertext.

[33]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[34]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory , 1997, J. Documentation.

[35]  A. Steven Pollitt,et al.  CANSEARCH: An expert systems approach to document retrieval , 1987, Inf. Process. Manag..

[36]  Christine L. Borgman Individual differences in the use of information retrieval systems: Some issues and some data. , 1987, SIGIR 1987.

[37]  Anselm Spoerri Visual tools for information retrieval , 1993, Proceedings 1993 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[38]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Braque: Design of an Interface to Support User Interaction in Information Retrieval , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[39]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  I 3 R: a new approach to the design of document retrieval systems , 1987 .

[40]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. I. background and methodology , 1988 .

[41]  James Allan,et al.  Aspect windows, 3-D visualizations, and indirect comparisons of information retrieval systems , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[42]  Arthur S. Pollitt An expert system as an online search intermediary , 1981 .

[43]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Ask for Information Retrieval: Part II. Results of a Design Study , 1982, J. Documentation.

[44]  Robert N. Oddy,et al.  INFORMATION RETRIEVAL THROUGH MAN‐MACHINE DIALOGUE , 1977 .