Valuing local endangered species: The role of intra-species substitutes

Valuation of endangered species is important in many circumstances, and particularly when assessing the impact of large accidental oil spills. Previous studies have tested the effects of including in the contingent valuation survey reminders about the existence of diverse substitutes (in terms of other natural resources also in danger of extinction in the same area, other programs to be valued, or alternative uses of money). We include a reminder about the existence of the same biological species not being under danger of extinction elsewhere. We believe this reminder allows individuals to make an easy assessment of the biological scarcity of the species they are supposed to value. Thus, the key difference with previous studies is that valuation of endangered species is combined with an assessment of preferences towards conservation of local and native species. Our WTP results are not sensitive to the information provided about other foreign substitutes. Implications of this finding are discussed.

[1]  C. Tisdell,et al.  Changing abundance of elephants and willingness to pay for their conservation. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  H. Neill.  The Context for Substitutes in CVM Studies: Some Empirical Observations , 1995 .

[3]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Random effects analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Catherine M. Chambers,et al.  A Contingent Valuation Estimate of the Benefits of Wolves in Minnesota , 2003 .

[5]  A. Dragun,et al.  The Worth of a Possum: Valuing Species with the Contingent Valuation Method , 2001 .

[6]  J. Whitehead,et al.  Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Reply to Another Comment , 1999 .

[7]  E. Bulte,et al.  Marginal Valuation of Charismatic Species: Implications for Conservation , 1999 .

[8]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Interviewer Effects on the Valuation of Goods with Ethical and Environmental Attributes , 2003 .

[9]  Ramón Martí,et al.  Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España , 2004 .

[10]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Use and Nonuse Values for Conserving Endangered Species: The Case of the Mediterranean Monk Seal , 2001 .

[11]  P. Boxall,et al.  Complements, Substitutes, Budget Constraints and Valuation , 2000 .

[12]  J. Loomis,et al.  Economic benefit of the protection program for the Steller sea lion , 2002 .

[13]  K. Boyle,et al.  Species substitution and question sequencing in contingent valuation surveys evaluating the hunting of several types of wildlife , 1990 .

[14]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates , 1994 .

[15]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[16]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Substitution Effects in CVM Values , 1994 .

[17]  J. Hoehn,et al.  Substitution Effects in the Valuation of Multiple Environmental Programs , 1993 .