Sensitization induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex is independent of CS-modality

Sensitization training with an auditory stimulus produces a general increase in response magnitude across the entire receptive field (RF) of neurons in the primary auditory cortex of the guinea pig (Bakin, J.S. and Weinberger, N.M., Brain Res., 536 (1990) 271-286). To determine if this effect reflects an auditory system-specific process or is caused by a process independent of the training stimulus modality, RFs in primary auditory cortex were characterized before and immediately after adult guinea pigs were given sensitization training with either an auditory or a visual training stimulus. General increases in auditory response magnitude across the RF were observed in 7 out of 7 auditory sensitization cases and 4 out of 5 visual sensitization cases. There were no statistical differences between the effects of auditory and visual sensitization training. These findings indicate that the general increases observed following sensitization training are the result of processes independent of CS modality, in contrast to the highly specific RF modifications that are caused by classical conditioning. The findings suggest that the 2 forms of RF plasticity, CS-specific re-tuning due to associative conditioning and polymodal general increases in gain due to non-associative sensitization, may reflect neural mechanisms involved in selective attention and vigilance, respectively.

[1]  R. Mark,et al.  Fear and the modification of acoustically evoked potentials during conditioning. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Konorski.  Integrative activity of the brain : an interdisciplinary approach , 1967 .

[3]  J. Furedy,et al.  Contingency theory and classical autonomic excitatory and inhibitory conditioning: some problems of assessment and interpretation. , 1975, Psychophysiology.

[4]  D. Diamond,et al.  Physiological plasticity in auditory cortex: Rapid induction by learning , 1987, Progress in Neurobiology.

[5]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields , 1986, Brain Research.

[6]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. , 1967, Psychological review.

[7]  R. Mark,et al.  Acoustically evoked potentials in the rat during conditioning. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  D. Powell,et al.  A comparison of two model systems of associative learning: heart rate and eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[9]  M. Eysenck.  Attention And Arousal, Cognition And Performance , 1982 .

[10]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Acquisition and Extinction of the Classically Conditioned Eyelid Response in the Albino Rabbit , 1962, Science.

[11]  J. Edeline,et al.  Subcortical adaptive filtering in the auditory system: associative receptive field plasticity in the dorsal medial geniculate body. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  J. Edeline,et al.  Thalamic short-term plasticity in the auditory system: associative returning of receptive fields in the ventral medial geniculate body. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  J. Furedy.  Explicitly-unpaired and truly-random CS--controls in human classical differential autonomic conditioning. , 1971, Psychophysiology.

[14]  D. Diamond,et al.  Role of context in the expression of learning-induced plasticity of single neurons in auditory cortex. , 1989, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  H. Schlosberg,et al.  The relationship between success and the laws of conditioning. , 1937 .

[16]  Henning Scheich,et al.  Neural substrates for tone-conditioned bradycardia demonstrated with 2-deoxyglucose. II. Auditory cortex plasticity , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig , 1990, Brain Research.

[18]  E. Kandel,et al.  Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning? , 1984, Psychological review.

[19]  Norman M. Weinberger,et al.  Effects of Conditioned Arousal on the Auditory System , 1982 .

[20]  F. Morrell,et al.  Electrophysiological contributions to the neural basis of learning. , 1961, Physiological reviews.

[21]  N. Mackintosh.  The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[22]  E R JOHN,et al.  High nervous functions: brain functions and learning. , 1961, Annual review of physiology.

[23]  A. Starr,et al.  Modulation of auditory cortex unit activity during the performance of a conditioned response , 1978, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  O D Creutzfeldt,et al.  Functional subdivisions in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[25]  S. S. Fox,et al.  Single-cell activity in cat motor cortex. I. Modifications during classical conditioning procedures. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  W N Frost,et al.  Parallel processing of short-term memory for sensitization in Aplysia. , 1988, Journal of neurobiology.

[27]  S. Ochs.  Integrative Activity of the Brain: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1968 .

[28]  J. Edeline,et al.  Associative retuning in the thalamic source of input to the amygdala and auditory cortex: receptive field plasticity in the medial division of the medial geniculate body. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  R. Rescorla.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. , 1967, Psychological review.