Evaluation of 4 Multisection CT Systems in Postoperative Imaging of a Cochlear Implant: A Human Cadaver and Phantom Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postoperative imaging of cochlear implants (CIs) needs to provide detailed information on localization of the electrode array. We evaluated visualization of a HiFocus1J array and accuracy of measurements of electrode positions for acquisitions with 64-section CT scanners of 4 major CT systems (Toshiba Aquilion-64, Philips Brilliance-64, GE LightSpeed-64, and Siemens Sensation-64). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An implanted human cadaver temporal bone, a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom containing a CI, and a point spread function (PSF) phantom were scanned. In the human cadaver temporal bone, the visibility of cochlear structures and electrode array were assessed by using a visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was performed with a paired 2-tailed Student t test with significant level set to .008 after Bonferroni correction. Distinction of individual electrode contacts was quantitatively evaluated. Quantitative assessment of electrode contact positions was achieved with the PMMA phantom by measurement of the displacement. In addition, PSF was measured to evaluate spatial resolution performance of the CT scanners. RESULTS: VAS scores were significantly lower for Brilliance-64 and LightSpeed-64 compared with Aquilion-64 and Sensation-64. Displacement of electrode contacts ranged from 0.05 to 0.14 mm on Aquilion-64, 0.07 to 0.16 mm on Brilliance-64, 0.07 to 0.61 mm on LightSpeed-64, and 0.03 to 0.13 mm on Sensation-64. PSF measurements show an in-plane and longitudinal resolution varying from 0.48 to 0.68 mm and 0.70 to 0.98 mm, respectively, over the 4 scanners. CONCLUSION: According to PSF results, electrode contacts of the studied CI can be visualized separately on all of the studied scanners unless curvature causes intercontact spacing narrowing. Assessment of visibility of CI and electrode contact positions, however, varies between scanners.

[1]  Johan H M Frijns,et al.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  S. Parnes,et al.  Complication of cochlear implantation surgery. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Cochlear implant failure: imaging evaluation of the electrode course. , 2003, Clinical radiology.

[4]  Antje Aschendorff,et al.  Nondestructive Three-dimensional Analysis of Electrode to Modiolus Proximity , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[6]  F B van der Beek,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and Without Positioner , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[7]  J. Nedzelski,et al.  Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems. , 1999, The American journal of otology.

[8]  W. Grolman,et al.  Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant , 2006, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  A Aschendorff,et al.  Imaging procedures in cochlear implant patients – evaluation of different radiological techniques , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  M W Skinner,et al.  Cochlear implants: three-dimensional localization by means of coregistration of CT and conventional radiographs. , 2001, Radiology.