An efficient surrogate-aided importance sampling framework for reliability analysis

Abstract Surrogates in lieu of expensive-to-evaluate performance functions can accelerate the reliability analysis greatly. This paper proposes a new two-stage framework for surrogate-aided reliability analysis named Surrogates for Importance Sampling (S4IS). In the first stage, a coarse surrogate is built to gain the information about failure regions. The second stage zooms into the important regions and improves the accuracy of the failure probability estimator by adaptively selecting support points. The learning functions are proposed to guide the selection of support points such that the exploration and exploitation can be dynamically balanced. As a generic framework, S4IS has the potential to incorporate different types of surrogates (Gaussian Processes, Support Vector Machines, Neural Network, etc.). The effectiveness and efficiency of S4IS are validated by five illustrative examples, which involve system reliability, highly nonlinear limit-state functions, small failure probability and moderately high dimensionality. The implementation of S4IS is made available to download at https://sites.google.com/site/josephsaihungcheung/ .

[1]  Maurice Lemaire,et al.  Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and Support Vector Machines , 2011 .

[2]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .

[3]  M. Eldred,et al.  Efficient Global Reliability Analysis for Nonlinear Implicit Performance Functions , 2008 .

[4]  Nicola Pedroni,et al.  An Adaptive Metamodel-Based Subset Importance Sampling approach for the assessment of the functional failure probability of a thermal-hydraulic passive system , 2017 .

[5]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[7]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .

[8]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Application of spherical subset simulation method and auxiliary domain method on a benchmark reliability study , 2007 .

[9]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  J. Beck,et al.  First excursion probabilities for linear systems by very efficient importance sampling , 2001 .

[11]  J. Hammersley SIMULATION AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD , 1982 .

[12]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability , 1998 .

[13]  B. Sudret,et al.  Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis , 2011, 1105.0562.

[14]  P. Das,et al.  Cumulative formation of response surface and its use in reliability analysis , 2000 .

[15]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[16]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Zhen Hu,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis-enhanced surrogate (GSAS) modeling for reliability analysis , 2016 .

[18]  S. Cheung,et al.  Spherical subset simulation (S³) for solving non-linear dynamical reliability problems , 2010 .

[19]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  A two-stage Subset Simulation-based approach for calculating the reliability of inelastic structural systems subjected to Gaussian random excitations , 2005 .

[20]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Wedge simulation method for calculating the reliability of linear dynamical systems , 2004 .

[21]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[22]  Anne Dutfoy,et al.  A generalization of the Nataf transformation to distributions with elliptical copula , 2009 .

[23]  C. Bucher,et al.  A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems , 1990 .

[24]  Jian Wang,et al.  LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  Domain Decomposition Method for Calculating the Failure Probability of Linear Dynamic Systems Subjected to Gaussian Stochastic Loads , 2006 .

[26]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[27]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[28]  Lambros S. Katafygiotis,et al.  An efficient simulation method for reliability analysis of linear dynamical systems using simple additive rules of probability , 2005 .

[29]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Byeng D. Youn,et al.  Adaptive-sparse polynomial chaos expansion for reliability analysis and design of complex engineering systems , 2011 .

[31]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[32]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study , 2001 .

[33]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[34]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Accelerated subset simulation with neural networks for reliability analysis , 2012 .