Unsteady analyses of thermal glass fibre drawing processes

Fibre drawing is an important industrial process for synthetic polymers and optical communications. In the manufacture of optical fibres, precise diameter control is critical to waveguide performance, with tolerances in the submicron range that are met through feedback controls on processing conditions. Fluctuations arise from material non-uniformity plague synthetic polymers but not optical silicate fibres which are drawn from a pristine source. The steady drawing process for glass fibres is well-understood (e.g. [11, 12, 20]). The linearized stability of steady solutions, which characterize limits on draw speed versus processing and material properties, is well-understood (e.g. [9, 10, 11]). Feedback is inherently transient, whereby one adjusts processing conditions in real time based on observations of diameter variations. Our goal in this paper is to delineate the degree of sensitivity to transient fluctuations in processing boundary conditions, for thermal glass fibre steady states that are linearly stable. This is the relevant information for identifying potential sources of observed diameter fluctuation, and for designing the boundary controls necessary to alter existing diameter variations. To evaluate the time-dependent final diameter response to boundary fluctuations, we numerically solve the model nonlinear partial differential equations of thermal glass fibre processing. Our model simulations indicate a relative insensitivity to mechanical effects (such as take-up rates, feed-in rates), but strong sensitivity to thermal fluctuations, which typically form a basis for feedback control.

[1]  Matthew R. Myers,et al.  A model for unsteady analysis of preform drawing , 1989 .

[2]  T. Dupont,et al.  Drop Formation in a One-Dimensional Approximation of the Navier-Stokes Equation , 1992, physics/0110081.

[3]  B. P. Huynh,et al.  Study of the non-isothermal glass fibre drawing process , 1983 .

[4]  R. Maccormack A rapid solver for hyperbolic systems of equations , 1976 .

[5]  J. R. A. Pearson,et al.  Computational Analysis of Polymer Processing , 1983 .

[6]  Susumu Kase,et al.  Studies on melt spinning. IV. On the stability of melt spinning , 1974 .

[7]  R. LeVeque Numerical methods for conservation laws , 1990 .

[8]  Helmut F. Wolf Handbook of fiber optics : theory and applications , 1979 .

[9]  Antony N. Beris,et al.  Time-dependent fiber spinning equations. 1. Analysis of the mathematical behavior , 1988 .

[10]  D. Marcuse Radiation losses of the HE(11) mode of a fiber with sinusoidally perturbed core boundary. , 1975, Applied optics.

[11]  S. Bechtel,et al.  Free surface viscoelastic and liquid crystalline polymer fibers and jets , 1999 .

[12]  Hong Zhou,et al.  Model study of the spinning of thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers: Fiber performance predictions and bounds on throughput , 1999 .

[13]  Susumu Kase,et al.  Studies on melt spinning. I. Fundamental equations on the dynamics of melt spinning , 1965 .

[14]  J. Pearson,et al.  Mechanics of polymer processing , 1985 .

[15]  S. Bechtel,et al.  Recovery of the Rayleigh capillary instability from slender 1‐D inviscid and viscous models , 1995 .

[16]  Hong Zhou,et al.  Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Polymer Fibers , 2000, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[17]  William W. Schultz,et al.  One-Dimensional Liquid Fibers , 1982 .

[18]  Qi Wang,et al.  Dynamics of Slender Viscoelastic Free Jets , 1994, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[19]  Joseph B. Keller,et al.  Slender jets and thin sheets with surface tension , 1990 .