Synovial fluid white cell and differential count in the diagnosis or exclusion of prosthetic joint infection.

Cut-off values with highest sensitivity and specificity for the synovial fluid white cell and differential count will facilitate the accurate diagnosis of infection in total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR). All patients undergoing revision TKR or THR for suspected prosthetic joint infection between 2009 and 2011 at two hospitals were identified. A total of 75 patients were included with a mean age of 70.3 years (38 to 89). Synovial fluid was aspirated pre-operatively and peri-prosthetic tissue samples were taken intra-operatively for histological and microbiological examination. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were constructed for white cell and differential counts in aspirated fluid. The optimal cut-off for TKR and THR was 1590 white cells/µl and 65% neutrophilia. The white cell count cut-off value identified for THR was notably lower than previously quoted in the literature. A cut-off value for white cell count in synovial aspirate in suspected prosthetic joint infection of between 1100 and 1700 white cells/µl is likely to be applicable to both THR and TKR.

[1]  J. Parvizi,et al.  New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  B. Morrey,et al.  The Mark Coventry Award: Diagnosis of Early Postoperative TKA Infection Using Synovial Fluid Analysis , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Thomas W. Bauer,et al.  Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip and Knee , 2010, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[4]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  S. Sporer,et al.  Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Robin Patel,et al.  Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  H. Kaufer,et al.  Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  J. O'Connell,et al.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. Deeks,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Criteria for Microbiological Diagnosis of Prosthetic-Joint Infection at Revision Arthroplasty , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[12]  J. Zuckerman,et al.  The Reliability of Analysis of Intraoperative Frozen Sections for Identifying Active Infection during Revision Hip or Knee Arthroplasty*† , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  H. Amstutz,et al.  The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.