Reasoning with 'Some'

[1]  N. Chater,et al.  Optimal data selection in the reduced array selection task (RAST) , 1997 .

[2]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  P C Wason,et al.  Reasoning about a Rule , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Embedded Implicatures as Pragmatic Inferences under Compositional Lexical Uncertainty , 2015, J. Semant..

[5]  I. Noveck.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[6]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance theory explains the selection task , 1995, Cognition.

[8]  Walter Schaeken,et al.  Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[9]  Charles Clifton,et al.  Embedded Implicatures Observed: A Comment on. , 2010, Semantics and pragmatics.

[10]  Daniel Büring,et al.  It's that, and that's it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites) , 2013 .

[11]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[12]  I. Noveck,et al.  A Developmental Investigation of Processing Costs in Implicature Production , 2007 .

[13]  Emmanuel Chemla,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures , 2011, J. Semant..

[14]  Mira Ariel.  Doubling up: Two upper bounds for scalars , 2015 .

[15]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  A pragmatic constraint on ambiguity detection , 2009 .

[16]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. , 1992 .

[17]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  REASONING AND A SENSE OF REALITY , 1972 .

[18]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Some implicatures reveal semantic differences , 2009 .

[19]  Bob van Tiel,et al.  When “All the Five Circles” are Four: New Exercises in Domain Restriction , 2016 .

[20]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[21]  Bob van Tiel.  Embedded Scalars and Typicality , 2014, J. Semant..

[22]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  A Second Look at Automatic Theory of Mind , 2015, Psychological science.

[23]  Ira A. Noveck,et al.  To What Extent Do Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas Affect Performance on Wason's Selection Task? , 1996 .

[24]  D. Sperber,et al.  The Why and How of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘Scalar Inferences’ , 2007 .

[25]  D. Barner,et al.  Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference , 2011, Cognition.

[26]  Lewis Bott,et al.  Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences , 2004 .

[27]  Michael Franke,et al.  Embedded Scalars, Preferred Readings and Prosody: An Experimental Revisit , 2016, J. Semant..

[28]  S. Levinson.  Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[29]  Keith Stenning,et al.  A little logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning , 2004 .

[30]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Making Inferences: The Case of Scalar Implicature Processing , 2011, CogSci.

[31]  Richard A. Griggs,et al.  The elusive thematic‐materials effect in Wason's selection task , 1982 .

[32]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .

[33]  K. Dieussaert,et al.  Some effort for some: Further evidence that scalar implicatures are effortful , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  P. Wason,et al.  Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem , 1971 .

[35]  Yi Ting Huang,et al.  Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Roger Levy,et al.  Post Hoc Analysis Decisions Drive the Reported Reading Time Effects in Hackl, Koster-Hale & Varvoutis (2012) , 2017, J. Semant..

[37]  P. Wason,et al.  Reasoning and Mental Representation , 1984 .

[38]  Uli Sauerland,et al.  Embedded Implicatures and Experimental Constraints: A Reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla , 2010 .

[39]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[40]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2003, Cognition.

[41]  Natalie M. Klein,et al.  “Some,” and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment , 2010, Cognition.

[42]  P. Wason.  On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .

[43]  Anton Benz,et al.  The Best Response Paradigm: A New Approach to Test Implicatures of Complex Sentences , 2018, Front. Commun..

[44]  E. Chemla.  Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data , 2009 .

[45]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Scalar implicature and local pragmatics. , 2009 .

[46]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Broaden Your Views: Implicatures of Domain Widening and the Logicality of Language , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.