High Visual Acuity Retinal Prosthesis: Understanding Limitations and Advancements Toward Functional Prosthetic Vision

Understanding Limitations and Advancements Toward Functional Prosthetic Vision Retinal prostheses have been in development for the past 20 years. These devices interface with retinal tissue to restore vision for patients suffering from degenerative retinal diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) or age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Of the first-generation devices, the Argus II from Second Sight Medical Products has become the first retinal prosthesis to receive FDA approval (2014) and CE mark (2011) to treat retinitis pigmentosa. As an initial attempt at a functioning retinal prosthesis, the Argus II is appropriately hailed as a breakthrough; however, it is approved only for severe advanced retinitis pigmentosa with NLP or bare LP vision1 and the actual vision restoration it accomplishes is subject to debate. While the early results from first-generation prostheses are encouraging, the restored visual acuity results are still well below the 20/200 threshold and average below 20/1,000. To understand the low visual function results from current prosthesis and evaluate the possible improvements in outcomes offered by next generation implants, it is necessary to examine the underlying scientific considerations that constrain their design.

[1]  Ione Fine,et al.  Brightness as a function of current amplitude in human retinal electrical stimulation , 2010 .

[2]  U. Klose,et al.  Positioning of electronic subretinal implants in blind retinitis pigmentosa patients through multimodal assessment of retinal structures. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Factors Affecting Perceptual Threshold in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Subjects. , 2013, Translational vision science & technology.

[4]  Angelika Braun,et al.  Artificial vision with wirelessly powered subretinal electronic implant alpha-IMS , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  J. Weiland,et al.  Retinal prosthesis. , 2014, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[6]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  First-in-Human Trial of a Novel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  The functional performance of the Argus II retinal prosthesis , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[8]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Long-Term Results from an Epiretinal Prosthesis to Restore Sight to the Blind. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Gert Cauwenberghs,et al.  Towards high-resolution retinal prostheses with direct optical addressing and inductive telemetry , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[11]  D. Palanker,et al.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight , 2016, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.